FAN VA TEXNOLOGIYA UCHUN INGLIZ TILI: GEOLOGIK TERMINOLOGIYANING XUSUSIYATLARI
##article.subject##:
Fan va texnologiya uchun ingliz tili (EST), geologik terminologiya, til o'rgatish usullari, aniq lingvistik maqsadlar, globallashuv va til ta'limi, ilmiy terminologiyaning rivojlanishi, terminologiyaning semantik tahlili, ilmiy ingliz tilini tushunish muammolari##article.abstract##
Maqolada maxsus maqsadlar uchun ingliz tili (ESP), xususan, fan va texnologiya uchun ingliz tili (EST) va umumiy ingliz tili (GE) terminologiyasi o‘rtasidagi farqlar oʻrganilib, boʻlajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchilari uchun individual lingvistik maqsadlarning ahamiyati taʼkidlangan. Unda chet tillarini o‘qitishning evolyutsiyasi muhokama qilinib, globallashuv tufayli turli kasbiy kontekstlarda ingliz tilini o’rgatishga e'tiborning o'zgarishi zarurligi ta’kidlanadi. Bundan tashqari, geologiya terminologiyasining, xususan, fors tilining tarixiy taraqqiyoti ko‘rib chiqilib, uning rivojlanish bosqichlari belgilab berilgan.
So‘z yasashning turli usullari orqali til lug‘atini boyitishda geologik terminologiyaning roliga alohida e’tibor beriladi. Nihoyat, talabalarning so‘zma-so‘z tarjima qilish odati tufayli ilmiy ingliz tilini tushunishda duch keladigan qiyinchiliklar muhokama qilinadi va ilmiy sohalarda til ko'nikmalarini oshirish strategiyalari taklif etiladi. Maqola muhokama qilingan mavzular bo‘yicha qo‘shimcha tadqiqot natijalarini taqdim etadigan havolalar bilan boyitilgan.
Библиографические ссылки
Buxton C. The emergence of a language of instruction for successful model-based elementary science learning: Lessons from a bilingual classroom. – 1999. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 436 957).
Crawford J. Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice (3rd ed.). – Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Educational Services, Inc., 1995.
Crystal D. Glossary of linguistic terms. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Henderson J., Wellington J. Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching science // School Science Review. – 1998. – Vol. 79, № 288. – P. 35–46.
Hyland K. The "Other" English: Thoughts on EAP and Academic Writing // The European English Messenger. – 2006. – Vol. 15, № 2.
Petit M. «Stylistique(s) contrastive(s) du discourse scientifique» // ASp. – 1997. – № 15–18. – P. 139–156.
Shaw J. Linguistically responsive science teaching // Electronic Magazine of Multicultural Education. – 2002. – Vol. 4, № 1.
Snow M., Met A., Genesee M. A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content instruction. In: P.A. Richard-Arnato, M.A. Snow (Eds.) The multicultural classroom. – London: Longman, 1992. – Chapter 3.
Tournier J. Les mots anglaise du français. – Paris: Éditions Belin, 1998.
Vinokur G.O. About some phenomena of word formation in Russian technical terminology // Proceedings of MIIFL. – 1939. – Vol. 5. – P. 3–55.
Gorelikova S.N. The nature of the term and some features of term formation in the English language // Bulletin of OSU. – 2002. – № 6. – P. 168–179.
Rosenthal D.E., Telenkova M.A. Dictionary-reference book of linguistic terms. – 2nd edition. – M.: Education, 1976.
Nelyubin L.L. Explanatory translation dictionary. – 3rd edition. – M.: Flint Science, 2003.
Brunot F. Geological terms. – 3rd ed. revue. – Paris, 1922. – 954 p.
Espersen O. A Modern English Grammar. – London, [n.d.]. – P. IV.
