ENGLISH FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: SPECIFICATIONS OF TERMINOLOGY IN GEOLOGY
Keywords:
EST, geological terminology, language teaching methodology, specific linguistic objectives, globalization, scientific terminology, semantic analysis, challengesAbstract
The article explores the terminology distinctions between English for specific purposes (ESP), particularly English for Science and Technology (EST), and General English (GE), emphasizing the importance of tailored linguistic objectives for future English teachers. It discusses the evolution of foreign language teaching, highlighting the shift towards teaching English as a necessity in various professional contexts due to globalization. Additionally, it traces the historical development of geological terminology, particularly in Farsi, and identifies stages in its evolution. It underscores the role of geological terminology in enriching language vocabulary through various word formation methods. Finally, the challenges students face
in comprehending scientific English due to reliance on literal translation are discussed, advocating for strategies to enhance language skills in scientific fields. The article is enriched with references providing further insights into the discussed topics.
References
Buxton C. The emergence of a language of instruction for successful model-based elementary science learning: Lessons from a bilingual classroom. – 1999. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 436 957).
Crawford J. Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice (3rd ed.). – Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Educational Services, Inc., 1995.
Crystal D. Glossary of linguistic terms. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Henderson J., Wellington J. Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching science // School Science Review. – 1998. – Vol. 79, № 288. – P. 35–46.
Hyland K. The "Other" English: Thoughts on EAP and Academic Writing // The European English Messenger. – 2006. – Vol. 15, № 2.
Petit M. «Stylistique(s) contrastive(s) du discourse scientifique» // ASp. – 1997. – № 15–18. – P. 139–156.
Shaw J. Linguistically responsive science teaching // Electronic Magazine of Multicultural Education. – 2002. – Vol. 4, № 1.
Snow M., Met A., Genesee M. A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content instruction. In: P.A. Richard-Arnato, M.A. Snow (Eds.) The multicultural classroom. – London: Longman, 1992. – Chapter 3.
Tournier J. Les mots anglaise du français. – Paris: Éditions Belin, 1998.
Vinokur G.O. About some phenomena of word formation in Russian technical terminology // Proceedings of MIIFL. – 1939. – Vol. 5. – P. 3–55.
Gorelikova S.N. The nature of the term and some features of term formation in the English language // Bulletin of OSU. – 2002. – № 6. – P. 168–179.
Rosenthal D.E., Telenkova M.A. Dictionary-reference book of linguistic terms. – 2nd edition. – M.: Education, 1976.
Nelyubin L.L. Explanatory translation dictionary. – 3rd edition. – M.: Flint Science, 2003.
Brunot F. Geological terms. – 3rd ed. revue. – Paris, 1922. – 954 p.
Espersen O. A Modern English Grammar. – London, [n.d.]. – P. IV.
