THE ATTITUDE AND MOTIVATION OF STUDENTS FOR ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

  • Azimova Shokhista Salokhiddinovna

Keywords:

students, attitude, motivation, online learning

Abstract

This research explored the attitudes and motives of students toward online learning in Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi (TUIT), Uzbekistan. During the first and last week of the online course, students in the online course of Educational Psychology were asked to complete the questionnaires administered. In the both surveys, a set of questions were asked about attitude. Only at the start of the course questions on interest, self-management and motivation were asked. Questions on the Research Phase Methodology were part of the end of the class survey.

References

Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D., 1997, “College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learningz”, Contemporary Education Psychology

Anderson, J.R., 1996, ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51(4)

Biggs, J., 1976, “Dimensions of study behaviour: Another look at ATI”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y.P., 2001, “The revised two-factor

Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F”, British Journal of Education

Psychology, 71

Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M., 2007, “Motivation, interest, and

positive affect in traditional undergraduate students”, Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2)

Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. 1972, “Levels of processing: A framework for memory research”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M., 1999, “A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic

motivation”, Psychological Bulletin, 125

Jacobson, R. R., 2000, “Differences between traditional and nontraditional students on the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire”, Dissertations Abstracts International, 61 (3-A)

Marton, F. & Saljo, R., 1976, “On qualitative differences in learning: I.

Outcomes and processes”, British Journal of Education Psychology, 46

Olgren, C. H., 1998, “Improving learning outcomes: The effects of

learning strategies and motivation”, In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing

Park University, 2006, Bloom’s Taxonomy Action Verbs Requiring

Cognitive Outcomes, Retrieved September 29, 2020, from

http://www.park.edu/assessment/forms/bloom.xls

Recio Saucedo, M., 2004, “Students approaches to learning, achievement,

and satisfaction in a distance course”, Sociotam, Revista Internacional de

Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, XIV (1)

Sansone, D., & Smith, J.L., 2000, Interest and self-regulation: The

relation between having to and want to. In Sansone & J. M Harackiewicz

(Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal

motivation and performance, San Diego, CA: Academic Press

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., &

Lacante, M., 2004, “Less is sometimes more: Goal content matters”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 96

University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2006, Locus of Control based on Rotter, J.B., 1966, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80, (1, Whole No. 609) accessed November 01, 2020, from www.psych.uncc.edu/pagoolka/LC.html

Downloads

Published

2021-04-17