KONSANGUIN NIKOHLAR FENOMENINING IJTIMOIY OMILLARI VA BIOETIK YONDASHUVLAR
##article.subject##:
yaqin qarindoshlar nikohi, endogamiya, konsanguin, bioetika, sotsiologik tahlil, irsiy kasalliklar, huquqiy cheklovlar, sog‘lom avlod##article.abstract##
Ushbu maqola qarindoshlar o‘rtasidagi nikohni sotsiologik va bioetik yondashuvlar asosida nazariy, ilmiy va empirik jihatdan tahlil qiladi. Nazariy qismda endogamiya, qarindoshchilik tizimi, ijtimoiy reproduktsiya va bioetik tamoyillar konseptual asos sifatida yoritiladi. Ilmiy tahlilda konsanguin nikohlarning demografik va genetik oqibatlari, xalqaro tajribalar hamda sog‘liqni saqlash siyosatidagi bioetik me’yorlar qiyosiy o‘rganiladi. Empirik tadqiqotda esa aholining qarindoshlar nikohiga munosabati, xavfni idrok etish darajasi va reproduktiv xulqni belgilovchi ijtimoiy omillar statistik usullar orqali baholanadi. Tadqiqot natijalari konsanguin nikohlar bo‘yicha ijtimoiy ongni oshirish va bioetik jihatdan mas’uliyatli qaror qabul qilishni qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi ilmiy xulosalarni taklif etadi.
Библиографические ссылки
https://lex.uz/acts/-104720#:~:text=16%2Dmodda.%20Nikoh,30%2D moddasi
Korean Civil Act (제809조) – https://elaw.klri.re.kr
.https://www.advantour.com/kazakhstan/traditions/wedding.htm?utm_source
Durkheim É. The Division of Labour in Society. Simon and Schuster, ISBN 0684836386, 9780684836386., 1997. 352 p.
Parsons T. The Social System. New York: Free Press. 1937. – 448 p.
Berger P.L., & Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. 1966.
Giddens E. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
WHO (2010). Medical genetic services in developing countries: The ethical, legal and social implications. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/medical-genetic-services
Beauchamp T.L., & Childress J.F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. Gillon R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ, 309(6948). – P.184-188.
Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (1969). https://www.scirp.org/reference /references papers? referenced=375764
