SOCIAL FACTORS OF THE PHENOMENON OF CONSANGUINE MARRIAGES AND BIOETHICAL APPROACHES
Keywords:
consanguineous marriage, endogamy, consanguinity, bioethics, sociological analysis, hereditary diseases, legal restrictions, healthy generationAbstract
This article analyzes marriage between relatives theoretically, scientifically and empirically based on sociological and bioethical approaches. The theoretical part covers endogamy, the kinship system, social reproduction and bioethical principles as a conceptual basis. The scientific analysis comparatively studies the demographic and genetic consequences of consanguineous marriages, international experiences and bioethical norms in health policy. In the empirical study, the attitude of the population to consanguineous marriages, the level of risk perception and social factors determining reproductive behavior are assessed using statistical methods. The results of the study offer scientific conclusions that support raising social awareness of consanguineous marriages and making bioethically responsible decisions.
References
https://lex.uz/acts/-104720#:~:text=16%2Dmodda.%20Nikoh,30%2D moddasi
Korean Civil Act (제809조) – https://elaw.klri.re.kr
.https://www.advantour.com/kazakhstan/traditions/wedding.htm?utm_source
Durkheim É. The Division of Labour in Society. Simon and Schuster, ISBN 0684836386, 9780684836386., 1997. 352 p.
Parsons T. The Social System. New York: Free Press. 1937. – 448 p.
Berger P.L., & Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. 1966.
Giddens E. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
WHO (2010). Medical genetic services in developing countries: The ethical, legal and social implications. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/medical-genetic-services
Beauchamp T.L., & Childress J.F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. Gillon R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ, 309(6948). – P.184-188.
Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (1969). https://www.scirp.org/reference /references papers? referenced=375764