MEDICINE AS SOCIAL INSTITUTION
Keywords:
medicine as a social institution, cultural medical systems, public/private models, mandatory health insurance, public health, medicalization, sick role, stigma, institutionalization, health policyAbstract
This article conceptualizes medicine as a social institution and examines the functional roles of healthcare within modern society. It situates medical sociology in the broader system of sociological sciences by clarifying its object, subject, and interdisciplinary linkages to economics, politics, psychology, and cultural studies. The paper demonstrates how socio-economic, cultural, environmental, and gender factors shape health and illness, engaging core concepts such as the sick role, medicalization, professional dominance, stigma, and the negotiated order of hospital practice. Using Uzbekistan as a case, the article maps the institutional architecture of healthcare (central, regional, primary, specialized, and private tiers), discusses the evolving mixed financing arrangements, the rollout of mandatory health insurance, digitization, quality standardization, and workforce development. Particular attention is paid to the mahalla institution and national medical culture, highlighting their influence on patient behavior and health-seeking pathways. The argument is made that reducing social inequalities, strengthening public health, and improving health policy performance require balancing social effectiveness with economic returns, prioritizing prevention, and expanding citizen participation. The paper concludes that modernizing medicine as a social institution entails integrating evidence-based practices, reinforcing primary care, and sustaining constructive dialogue with plural medical practices, thereby advancing equitable and effective population health.
References
Parsons T. The social system. – N.Y.: The free press, 1964 (1951). – 575 p.2.
Вахштайн В.С. Драматургическая теория Ирвинга Гофман на: два прочтения // Социологическое обозрение, 2003, Т3, №4. – С. 104-118.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии. – М.: Наука, 1991. – 572 с.
Вебер М. Избранное. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2006. – С.3.
Freidson E., Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd Mead, 1970.
Foucault, M. Naissance de la clinique. Une archéologie du regard médical [The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception]. P.U.F., Paris. 1963.
Irving Kenneth Zola. The Medicalization of Aging and Disability. In book: The Elderly.2017. (pp.37-53) DOI:10.4324/9781315240046-5
Peter Conrad. The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. 2007.P. 224
Strauss A., Schatzman L., Ehrlich D., Bucher R., & Sabshin M. The hospital and its negotiated order. In E. Friedson (Ed.), The Hospital in Modern Society. New York: Free Press. 1963. pp. 147–169.
Axmedova F. Tibbiyot yoʻnalishidagi sotsial muammolar. Journal of innovations in scientific and educational. RESEARCH VOLUME-2, ISSUE-15 (28-February).2023. Т. 2. №15. – B.15-20.
Решетников А. В. Социология медицины. – М., 2002.
Lazarus R.S. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. – New York: McGraw-Hill.1966. – P.124.
Сурмач, М. Ю. Социология медицины как научная специальность и как предмет преподавания: проблемное поле, перспективы развития / М.Ю.Сурмач // Социология. – 2015. – С. 97–104.
Axmedova F. Tibbiyot sotsiologiyasi faning vujudga kelishi va rivojlanishi. Ijtimoiy tadqiqotlar jurnali.8-jild, 2-son, 49-61 bb.