THE ROLE OF GOOD IN STRENGTHENING SOCIAL RELATIONS AT THE CONSENSUS LEVEL
Keywords:
consensus, kindness, compassion, globalization, activism, relationships, compromise, affiliation, altruismAbstract
The article describes the theory of consensus in social relations, that is, solidarity, as a requirement for the formation of a social and spiritual environment in the family, community, at an enterprise and in an organization that provides a high spirit of people. The love given to a person from youth helps to increase the stability of his social, economic and political system to internal and external influences. For the progressive movement of a person dissatisfied with compassion, it is impossible to achieve social consensus. It is argued that it is necessary to reach agreement between a person and society on the main directions of personal development or its specific aspects. An important aspect of modernizing compassion as a social consensus is the definition of its areas (levels).
Based on theoretical and practical analysis of the concept of consensus, it was mainly interpreted as a possible result of getting out of a conflict situation. In modern approaches, consensus is described as a way of resolving conflicts and a way of making decisions in conflict situations, characterized by stability as a special state of society.
The article analyzes the Western interpretation of consensus and the conditions under which it is achieved, without taking into account the national characteristics of other civilizations, for example, the Eastern system. In the East, the ancient Chinese sage Confucius, Central Asian thinkers Abu RaikhanBeruni and AlisherNavoi shared their views on the foundations of compassion and harmony.
In general, this article touches on a sociological analysis of the moral principles of compassion and kindness, which are designed to be reflected in one way or another in practice in the activities of each person. In our opinion, this will act as the basis and the possibility of the third Renaissance and the achievement of high peaks.
References
Абу Райҳон Беруний.Танланган асарлар, 1-том. – Т., 1968. –Б. 404.
Бекмуродов М.Б. Замонавий бошқарув социологияси. –Т.: YOSHLAR NASHRIYOT UYI. 2020 й. –Б.136.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделение общественного труда; Метод социологии. М., 1991. С- 64.
Спенсер Г. Личность и государство. М., 2007. С- 92.
Фромм Э. Бегство от свободы // Догмат о Христе. - М., 1998. С- 403.
Каранг: Американская социология: Перспективы. Проблемы. Методы / Под ред. Т.Парсонса. — М.: Прогресс, 1972. С -190.
Публика и толпа: Этюд Габриэля Тарда / Пер. Ф. Латернера. — СПб.: Б-ка бывш. Иванова, 1899. С - 48.
Wilson E.O. Sociobiology, The New Synthesis. Cambridge, 1975. С - 28.
Республика “Оила” илмий-амалий марказининг 2019 йил биринчи ярми таҳлилий ҳисоботидан.
Бекмуродов М.Б. Замонавий бошқарув социологияси. - Т.: YOSHLAR NASHRIYOT UYI. 2020 й. – Б. 341.
Президент Ш.М.Мирзиёевнинг Сирдарё вилоятида сув омборида содир бўлган тўфон ҳалокатларини бартараф этиш бўйича ташрифи чоғида билдирилган фикр. Янги Ўзбекистон газетаси 2020 йил 13 октябрь сони.