PHILOSOPHICAL–COGNITIVE ANALYSIS AND THE SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF CLIP THINKING AS A PHENOMENON OF DIGITAL CULTURE

Authors

  • Shermuxamedova Niginaxon Arslonovna

Keywords:

clip thinking; digital culture; cognition; fragmented perception; knowledge transformation

Abstract

Clip thinking emerges under the influence of digital culture, accelerating perception and reshaping the depth of cognitive processing. This mode of thinking increases the fragmentation of consciousness and reduces the ability to sustain focused attention. Social communication чanges as well, shifting toward brief, emotionally чarged patterns of interaction. The transformation of cognitive structures affects education, political culture, and broader social behavior. These shifts require a philosophical and cognitive assessment to understand their long–term implications. Therefore, this article provides a detailed examination of the essence of clip thinking, its cognitive meчanisms, and its social consequences.

References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press, 2019, pp. 1–450.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 1–390.

Carr, N. (2011). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011, pp. 1–276.

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015, pp. 1–320.

Clark, A. (2016). Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 1–428.

Johnson, M. (2017). The New Mind: How Digital Media Shape Human Cognition. London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 1–240.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pp. 1–499.

Mankowski, L. (2021). Culture of Fragments: Visuality and Knowledge in the Digital Age. Berlin: Springer, 2021, pp. 1–300.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw–Hill, 1964, pp. 1–359.

Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Teчnological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs, 2013, pp. 1–415.

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Чanging What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Press, 2011, pp. 1–294.

Pew Researч Center. (последние годы). Digital Life and Information Consumption Trends. Washington, D.C.: Pew Researч Center, год публикации, pp. 1–100.

Rosen, L. (2016). The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High–Teч World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016, pp. 1–250.

Rose, G. (2019). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage Publications, 2019, pp. 1–350.

Small, G., Vorgan, G. (2013). iBrain: Surviving the Teчnological Alteration of the Modern Mind. New York: HarperCollins, 2013, pp. 1–250.

Sunstein, C. (2018). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018, pp. 1–328.

Toffler, A. (2006). Revolutionary Wealth. New York: Knopf, 2006, pp. 1–512.

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press, 2015, pp. 1–436.

UNESCO. (последние годы). Digital Literacy and Cognitive Skills Development: Global Reports. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, год публикации, pp. 1–120.

Williams, D. (2020). Learning in the Age of Distraction: Education and Attention in Digital Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020, pp. 1–210.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019, pp. 1–704.

Deloitte Digital. (2023). Digital Media Consumption Study. London: Deloitte Publishing, год публикации, pp. 1–85.

Published

2026-01-16