EXPLORING AC GRAYLING’S REALISTIC APPROACH TOWARDS COMBATING SKEPTICISM IN CONTEMPORARY EPISTEMOLOGY

Authors

  • Oni
  • Adetunji Sunday

Keywords:

skepticism, knowledge, non-dogmatic, belief, reality, experience, epistemology, Grayling

Abstract

Grayling, one of the contemporary epistemologists is credited with developing realist approach to challenging skepticism and defending knowledge claims. The paper explores the theoretical basis of Gralying’s approach and assesses its strength and weakness. Drawing the philosophy of philosophers like David Hume, John Locke, Grayling argues that skepticism is fundamentally misguided in its attempt to challenge the reliability of knowledge and instead proposes a more realistic approach which advocates for a moderate realism in which knowledge is seen to be a result of reliable processes, beliefs and experience, that is always provisional and subject to changes as new fact and circumstances arise. This allows for the possibility of knowledge without sacrificing the reality of uncertainty as well as practical and non dogmatic approach that is more consistent with complexities of the real world. The paper therefore affirms that Grayling’s approaches is a proactive and insightful perspective in the sense that it allowing for a pragmatic and non-dogmatic approach that is more consistent with the complexities of our contemporary society

References

Baldwin, J.B (1960). Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Gloucester: Macmillan,(ed.)

Ruch, E.A (1977). The Way of Knowing and Perception, Roma: International University of Lesotho, - P 528

Hamlyn, D. W (1970). Theory of Knowledge, London: Macmillian Press Ltd, p 9

Bewaji, J.A. (2007). An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge: A Pluricultural Approach. Ibadan: Hope Publications Ltd, -P.12

Samuel, S Stumpt (1977). Philosophy; History and Problem, New York ;McGraw Hill Coy, - P.39

James K. Dew Jr. and Mark W. Foreman (2014). How Do We Know? An Introduction to Epistemology, InterVarsity Press,. - P10.

Stone, J.(1984). Dreaming & Certainty, Philosophical Studies, 45.

DeRose,K.(1992). Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LII, No. 4,

Owolabi, K. (2000). The Nature and Problems of Epistemology in K. Owolabi (ed), Issues and Problems in Philosophy, Ibadan: GROVACS,

Ayer, A. J. (1956). The Problem of Knowledge, London: Macmillan,

Slote, M. A(1970). Reason and Scepticism, London: Allen and Unwin Ltd,

Lirde Martin,(1998) Epistemology; The Big Question, Oxford: Blackwill publisher inc, -P 9

Grayling A.C (2008). Scepticism and the possibility of knowledge, New York: Continuum

Bittle, C(1936). Reality and the Man, Milwaukee: The Bruce publishing co.

Hamlyn, D (1972). The theory of Knowledge, New York: London University press ltd.

Griffiths, A.P (1967). knowledge and Belief, London; Oxford University press 1967.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23