THE ROLE OF AMIR KHUSRAV DEHLAVI AND ALISHER NAVOI IN SPIRITUAL PERFECTION OF MANKIND
Keywords:
Alisher Navoi, lyrical heritage, textuality, spiritual perfection, Farhad's journey to Greece, Ibn Khaldun,Abstract
The article deals with the issue of the spiritual development of mankind as an orientalist-literary critic, and the subject is covered on the basis of new approaches that have not been seen in the scientific literature to date. For example, the history of the ancient world was divided into 3 stages - 1) primitive society, 2) city-states, 3) great kingdoms (empires), coordinated by archaeologists as "Stone Age", "Bronze Age", "Iron Age". These new interpretations have been proven based on the views of oriental thinkers. It has been proved, based on the research of world scientists, that the spiritual development of this period developed on the basis of mythical thinking. The history of the Middle Ages is considered within the framework of the Muslim cultural region, and the spiritual development of the peoples of the region is considered as a development of monotheistic thinking and its 4 stages - 1) Sunnah, 2) Muslim enlightenment, 3) Sufi teachings and irfan, 4) “Majoz tariqi” - are briefly explained. In the works of the great poets of the East, Amir Khusrav Dehlavi and Alisher Navoi, the stage of the "Majoz tariqi", which is theoretically substantiated as an independent spiritual essence of fiction, is in fact has been proved in detail by the author that the development of monotheistic thinking is the highest stage in the spiritual development of not only the peoples of the region, but of all mankind. The theoretical considerations summarized in the article are the author's books: "Stages of perfection of our national spirituality", "Fundamentals of our national spirituality", "Introduction to Navoi studies" and a number of scientific articles which are published in different years. They are reflected in one form or another, and in this text they are enriched to some extent with new interpretations.
References
Lazard G. La language simbolique du ghazal. – Convegno internazionale sulla hoesia di Hafez. – Roma, 1978. – P. 61.
Абу Ҳомид Ғаззолий. Кимиёйи саодат (Руҳ ҳақиқати). – Т.: Адолат, 2005. – С. 36.
Алишер Навоий. Мукаммал асарлар тўплами. Йигирма томлик. Саккизинчи том. Хамса: Фарҳод ва Ширин. – Т.: Фан, 1991. – 544 б.
Алишер Навоий. Хамса. – Т., 1960. – 447 б.
Амир Хусрау Дихлави. Ширин и Хусрау (критический текст). – М.: Наука, 1979. – С. 40.
Бақоев М. Ҳаёт ва эжодиёти Хусрави Деҳлавий. – Душанбе: Дониш, 1975. – 247 с.
Бертельс Е.Э. Избранные труды. Навои и Джами. – М.: Наука, 1965. – С. 141-352.
Бертельс Е.Э. Избранные труды. Низами и Фузули. – М.: Наука, 1962. – С. 204-281.
Бертельс Е.Э. Избранные труды. Суфизм и суфийская литература. – М.: Наука, 1965. – 419 с.
Бьюкенен П. Смерть Запада. – М.: АСТ, 2003.
Голосовкер Я.Э. Логика мифа. – М.: Наука, 1987.
Морис Букай. Библия, Коран и наука (La Bible, le Coran et la Science : Les Écritures Saintes examinées à la lumière des connaissances modernes, Seghers, 1976).
Османов М. Стиль персидско-таджикской поэзии (IX-X вв.). – М.: Наука, 1974. – 296 с.
Очерки истории арабской культуры V-XV вв. – М.: Наука, 1982. – С. 311-356.
Ҳасанов А. Қадимги Арабистон ва илк ислом. Жоҳилия асри. – Т.: Тошкент ислом университети, 2001. – Б. 8-9.