CУНЪИЙ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТ ВА КАТТА ҲАЖМДАГИ МАЪЛУМОТЛАР (BIG DATA)
##article.subject##:
katta hajmdagi ma’lumotlar (Big Data), sun’iy intellekt, huquqiy tartibga solish, algoritmlar, Data science, ahloqiy qoildalar, mashinali o‘rganish (Machine learning), ijtimoiy tengsizlik.##article.abstract##
Ushbu maqolada sun’iy intellekt va katta hajmdagi ma’lumotlarning qollanilishi to‘grisidagi masalalar ko‘rib chiqilgan.Muallif tomonidan sun’iy intellekt va katta hajmdagi ma’lumotlar qo‘llanilishining huquqiy jihatalari, ahloqiy masalalar, huquqiy muammolar va ularning echimi, shuningdek javobgarlik masalalari tahlil etilgan. Ushbu maqolada sun’iy intellekt tehnologiyalari va katta hajmadagi ma’lumotlarni qo‘llanilishida ijtimoiy tengsizlikni huquqiy hodisda sifatida sun’iy intellekt va katta hajmadagi ma’lumotlarni keng doirda qo‘llash bo‘yicha muammolar ko‘rib chiqilgan.
Библиографические ссылки
Пилецкая, А. В. Искусственный интеллект и большие данные / А. В. Пилецкая. — Текст: непосредственный // Молодой ученый. — 2019. — № 50 (288). — С. 20-22. — URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/288/65241/ (дата обращения: 22.11.2022).
Иванов А.А. Мечтают ли андроиды об электроовцах? 2017. 15 февр. // Закон.ru. URL: http://zakon.ru/blog/2017/2/15/mechtayut_li_androidy_ob_e lektroovcah (дата обращения: 28.07.2017).
Ashford N.A., Hall R.P. The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2011. No. 3. P. 270–292.
Shukhrat, J. (2022)., Essential legal issues of AI use in contracts.
Weng Y-H. et al. Intersection of “Tokku” special zone, robots, and the law: a case study on legal impacts to humanoid robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. Vol. 7. 2015. Iss. 5. P. 841–857.
Maia A.F. The Legal Status of Artificially Intelligent Robots: Personhood, Taxation and Control. 2017. 1 June. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2985466 (дата обращения: 28.07.2017).
Solaiman S.M. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law. Vol. 25. 2017. Iss. 2. P. 155–179.
Stone P. et al. ‘Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030’. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015–2016. Stanford: Stanford University. URL: http://ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report (дата обращения: 28.07.2017).
Markou Ch. The Conflict of Law and Technology: A Systems Theory of Arificial Intelligence Regulation. The University of Cambridge. Faculty of Law. URL: http://www.law.cam.ac.uk/people/research-students/cpmarkou/6574 (дата обращения: 28.07.2017).
J., Fetz E., Donoghue J., Ushiba J., Spörhase U. et al. Help, hope, and hype: Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science. Vol. 356. 2017. Iss. 6345. P. 1338, 1339.
Robot Law / ed. by R. Calo, A.M. Froomkin, I. Kerr. Cheltenham, Massachusetts, 2016.
Pagallo U. The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts (Law, Governance and Technology Series). Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Shukhrat, J. (2021). Contemporary Tendencies of the Legal Regulation of the Intellectual Migration Process. International Journal of Development and Public Policy, 1(6), 205-209.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY, Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence, October 2016, p. 39.
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2018-09-07.
R. KRAUSE, “Artificial Intelligence Stocks To Buy And Watch Amid Rising AI Competition”, Investor’s Business Daily, 12 December 2019.
R. SURZ, “U.S. Stock Market Is Biggest & Most Expensive In World, But U.S. Economy Is Not The Most Productive”, Nasdaq, 2 April 2018.
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission, on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), OJ C 252, 18 July 2018, p. 245.
