THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION AND ARBITRATION COURTS AND THEIR TYPES IN RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES IN AN ALTERNATIVE ORDER
Keywords:
arbitration court, arbitrator, institutional, provisional, normative legal act, law, codeAbstract
Today, in addition to the competent courts, arbitration and arbitration courts face various problems when considering a number of cases on civil and economic disputes in the manner of alternative dispute resolution. This article discusses the role of arbitration and arbitration courts, their types with an analysis of foreign experience. Also, in the course of studying the legal acts of foreign countries, the role of national arbitrations and arbitration courts in alternative dispute resolution and their types was discussed, and proposals and recommendations for our national legislation are being developed.
References
Федоров А.Г. Международний коммерческий арбитраж. M., 2000. С. 5. (Fedorov A.G. International commercial arbitration. М., 2000. p.5.)
Яковлев В.Ф. Экономика и суд // Российский юридический журнал. 1993. №1. С.51. (Yakovlev V.F. Economics and court // Russian legal journal. 1993. №1. р.51.)
Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Party Autonomy and Case Management Experiences and Suggestions of an Arbitrator, 11 schiedsvz 1, 2 (2013); Born, supra note 1, at 168-169.
Andrew Tweeddale & Keren Tweeddale, Arbitration of Commercial Disputes 3.01 (2005) р.176.
Dana H. Freyer, Practical Considerations in Drafting Dispute Resolution Provisions in International Commercial Contracts: A US Perspective, 15(4) J. INT’L ARB. 7, 20-23 (1998).
Bertie Vigras, The Role of Institutions in Arbitration, in Handbook of Arbitration Practice р.461 (Ronald Bernstein & Derek Wood et al. eds., 2d ed. 1993).
Bruce Harris, London Maritime Arbitration, reprinted in 77 Arbitration 116- 122 (2011).
Mike Oliver Korte, Die Hamburger Freundschaftliche Arbitrage – Ein Überblick Anlässlich des 100-jährigen Jubiläums des § 20 Platzusancen für den Hamburgischen Warenhandel, in Zeitschrift Für Schiedsverfahren рр.240-241 (2004);
Hanspeter Vogel, Institutionalisierte Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, in Recht Und Juristen in Hamburg. р. 22 (1994).
In this sense, Karl Heinz Schwab & Gerhard Walter, Kapitel 41. Grundlagen des Internationalen Schiedsverfahrens, in Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit 16 (Schwab & Walter et al. eds., 2000).
Степкин С.П., Губарева А.В “Государственное управление в сфере третейского разбирательства: проблемы реформы” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2018. № 3, С. 194. (Stepkin S.P., Gubareva A.V. “Public Administration in the Sphere of Arbitration: Problems of Reform” Issues of State and Municipal Administration. 2018. No. 3, p. 194)
Latham & Watkins • Guide to International Arbitration. USA. 2017. pp. 20-21.
Салимова И.М. “Иқтисодий низоларнинг тааллуқлилиги (назарий-ҳуқуқий ва процессуал жиҳатлари). юридик фанлар бўйича фалсафа докторилик диссертацияси. Т. 2020. Б.45. (Salimova I.M. “The relevance of economic disputes (theoretical-legal and procedural aspects). doctoral dissertation in philosophy of law. T. 2020. р.45.)
Ефимова В.В. Арбитражное процессуальное право.Учебное пособие. «Дашков и К» ИТК, 2008. – С. 27. (Efimova V.V. Arbitration procedural law. Study guide. "Dashkov and K" ITK, 2008. р. 27.)
ДФК “Халқаро арбитраж суди”га 2021 йил 8 ноябрь куни юборилган Фуқаролик ишлари бўйича Тошкент шаҳар Шайхонтоҳур туманлараро судининг Каб-4/2021-сонли хати (Letter No. Kab-4/2021 of the Shayhantahur Interdistrict Court for Civil Cases of Tashkent, sent to the International Court of Arbitration on November 8, 2021)
