RELIABILITY OF EVIDENCE IS AN ESSENTIAL CRITERION OF THE EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT INSTITUTE
Keywords:
reliability of evidence, subject of evaluation, principles of establishing the truth, strengthening of evidence, admissibility of evidence, psychological factors, lawyer-psychologistAbstract
Ensuring the reliability of evidence is one of the most basic qualities that are assigned to persons responsible for conducting criminal cases. It is necessary to emphasize that this practice belongs to the authority of state bodies and officials responsible for conducting criminal proceedings. As participants in the criminal process, the victim and the defendant have the opportunity to object only by appealing the final decision of the bodies in question on the reliability of the evidence in accordance with the procedure established by law. Nowadays, objections to the reliability of evidence are often made through a lawyer. The reliability of evidence is a set of data corresponding to reality, free from suspicion, based on the results of the study and generalization of evidence collected by the subjects of the evaluation of evidence in the case. The correct solution to the issue of the reliability of evidence means that the principles of legality and fairness are fully respected in their assessment.
References
В.С.Балакшин. Соотношение допустимости доказательств с их относимостью и достоверностью // Законность. 2014. № 3. – С. 8–14. (V.S. Balakshin. The ratio of the admissibility of evidence with their relevance and reliability // Legitimacy. 2014. No. 3. - P. 8–14)
С.М.Рахмонова. Жиноят процессуал ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Дарслик. Муаллифлар жамоаси / ю.ф.д. проф. Г.З. Тўлаганова, ю.ф.н, доц. С.М.Рахмоноваларнинг умумий таҳрири остида. – Тошкент. ТДЮУ нашриёти. 2017. – Б. 182. ( S.M.Rakhmanova. Criminal Procedural Law. General part. Textbook. Team of authors / doctor of law professor G.Z. Tolaganova, candidate of Legal Sciences Associate Professor S.M.Rakhmonova’s under general edit. – Tashkent. TSLU publishing. 2017. – P. 182.)
Н.В.Савельева. Проблемы доказательств и доказывания в уголовном процессе: учеб. пособие // – Краснодар: КубГАУ, 2019. – Б. 35. (N.V.Savelieva. Problems of evidence and proof in criminal proceedings: studies. Stipend // – Krasnodar: KubGAU, 2019. – P. 35.)
Л.К.Капустина. Соотношение допустимости и достоверности доказательств в уголовном судопроизводстве // Вестник Казанского юридического института МВД России. № 3(37) 2019. – С. 386-390. (L.K. Kapustina. The ratio of the admissibility and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. № 3(37) 2019. – P. 386-390.)
Р.Г.Непранов. Некоторые вопросы оценки свойств доказательств в уголовно-процессуальном праве России // Юрист-Правовед. 2013. № 4 (59). – С. 50–55. (R.G.Nepranov. Some issues of evaluation of the properties of evidence in the criminal procedure law of Russia // Lawyer-Jurist. № 4 (59). – P. 50–55.)
П.А.Лупинская. Доказывание. Понятие и общая характеристика. Уголовный процесс. – М., 1995. – С. 151-152. (P.A.Lupinskaya. Proof. The concept and general characteristics. Criminal proceedings. – М., 1995. – P. 151-152.)
А.К.Педенчук. Проблемы обеспечения достоверности заключения судебного эксперта. – М., 1992. – С. 76-88. (A.K.Pedenchuk. Problems of ensuring the reliability of the conclusion of a forensic expert. – М., 1992. – P. 76-88.)
А.Эргашев. Дастлабки тергов босқичида вояга етмаганларни сўроқ қилишнинг айрим жиҳатлари // Жиноят процесси ва криминалистика. 2010. №1. – Б. 131. (A.Ergashev. Some aspects of juvenile interrogation at the initial investigation stage // Criminal proceedings and criminalistics. 2010. №1. – P. 131.)
Andreas Kangur. Can rules of criminal evidence be devised that would be uniform across jurisdictions. Phd dissertation. Scotland. 2015. p. 9.
Т.Бородкина. Саморока В. О возможности использования специальных знаний в области психологии для проверки показаний допрашиваемого лица // Уголовный процесс. 2006. №3. – Б. 79-82. (T. Borodkin. Samoroka V. About the possibility of using special knowledge in the field of psychology to verify the testimony of the interrogated person // Criminal proceedings. 2006. №3. – P. 79-82.)
И.В.Махова. К вопросу об оценке достоверности показаний // Вестник криминалистики. 2010. №2 (30). – Б. 80. (I.V. Makhova. On the issue of assessing the reliability of testimony // Bulletin of Criminalistics. 2010. №2 (30). – P. 80.)
