SUBJECTIVE SIGNS OF THEFT OF PROPERTY OF OTHER PERSONS BY EXTORTION
Keywords:
mitigating circumstance, affect, strong mental excitement, level of social danger, aggression, negligence, severe insult, public dangerAbstract
In the article, the author describes the objective signs of theft of property of other persons by extortion, some considerations related to the subject and subjective side of this crime. The author also notes that one of the main functions of criminal law is to ensure the inviolability of property rights. It can be said that most crimes will be aimed at generating income, easy acquisition of property or property rights. Such crimes mainly include crimes in the economic sphere, among which the most common are crimes related to theft and fraud. However, among these types of crimes, the crime of extortion differs from both of the most frequently mentioned crimes by the fact that it causes the victim not only material, but also significant moral damage. He also does not inform law enforcement agencies that the victim is threatened with violence against himself or his loved ones, damage to property or destruction of property, or disclosure of information that should be kept secret for the victim during the commission of the crime. This increases the latency of these types of crimes and encourages the person who committed the crime to commit another crime in the future. Article 53 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan establishes the creation of property of various forms on the basis of the economy of Uzbekistan aimed at the development of market relations, guarantees the State equal rights of all forms of ownership and enhanced legal protection. In the context of globalization, the sharp development of public relations in our country is the reason for the expansion of forms and types of crimes related to the robbery of other people's property. The author also proposed to supplement criminal liability for extortion with an aggravating feature in accordance with the subject of the crime in the established norm, that is, a sign ‘that the act was committed by a person who had previously committed the crime of robbery’.
References
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг 2017 йил 7 февралдаги ПФ-4947-сон “Ўзбекистон Республикасини янада ривожлантириш бўйича Ҳаракатлар стратегияси тўғрисида”ги Фармони. Ўзбекистон Республикаси қонун ҳужжатлари тўплами, 2017 й., 6-сон, 70-модда. (Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated February 7, 2017 No. PF-4947 "On the Strategy of Actions for the Further Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan". Collection of legal documents of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2017, No. 6, Article 70.)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг “2022 – 2026 йилларга мўлжалланган Янги Ўзбекистоннинг тараққиёт стратегияси тўғрисида”ги фармони. https://lex.uz/docs/5841063 (Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the development strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026".)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Конституцияси. https://lex.uz/docs/20596 (Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси қонун ҳужжатлари тўплами, 2004 й., 37-сон, 408-модда; 2015 й., 23-сон, 301-модда, 32-сон, 425-модда, 33-сон, 439-модда, 52-сон, 645-модда (Collection of legal documents of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2004, No. 37, Article 408; 2015, No. 23, Article 301, No. 32, Article 425, No. 33, Article 439, No. 52, Article 645)
Ўзбекистон ССРнинг Жиноят кодекси. Т.: Ўзбекистон, 1971. 10-б. (Criminal Code of the Uzbek SSR. T.: Uzbekistan, 1971. 10 p)
Рустамбоев М.Х. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят кодексига шарҳлар. Махсус қисм. – Тошкент: ИИВ Академия, 2016. – Б. 209. (Rustamboev M.Kh. Comments on the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Special part. - Tashkent: MIA Academy, 2016. - B. 209.)
Кочои С.М. Ответственность за корыстные преступления против собственности по законодательству России: Автореф. дис. докт. юрид. наук. – М, 2009. – С. 23. (Kochoi S.M. Responsibility for mercenary crimes against property under Russian law: Abstract of the thesis. dis. doc. legal Sciences. - M, 2009. - S. 23.)
Жиноят ишлари бўйича Тошкент шаҳар Олмазор туман суди архивидан. (From the archives of the Almazor district court of Tashkent city on criminal cases.)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди Пленумининг “Ўзгалар мулкини ўғрилик, талончилик ва босқинчилик билан талон-торож қилиш жиноят ишлари бўйича суд амалиёти тўғрисида”ги 1999 йил 30 апрелдаги 6-сон Қарори, 4-банд. (Resolution No. 6 of April 30, 1999 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On judicial practice in the criminal cases of theft, robbery and robbery of other people's property by invasion", paragraph 4.аа)
Демидов, Ю.А. Социальная ценность и оценка в уголовном праве/ Ю.А.Демидов.- М.: Юридическая литература, 1975. – С. 11. (Demidov Yu.A. Social value and assessment in criminal law / Yu.A. Demidov.- M .: Legal literature, 1975. - P. 11)
Ворошилин Е.В., Кригер Г.А. Кўрсатилган асар. – Б. 23.( Voroshilin E.V., Krieger G.A. Featured work. - B. 23.)
Rustamboyev M.H. Jinoyat huquqi (umumiy qism). Oliy o’quv yurtlari uchun darslik. – Toshkent: TDYI, 2006. – B. 170. (Rustamboyev M.H. Criminal law (general part). Textbook for higher educational institutions. - Tashkent: TDYI, 2006. - P. 170.)
Дагель П.С, Котов Д.П. Субъективная сторона преступления и ее установление. – Воронеж: ВГУ, 1974. – С. 23-24; Филановский И.Г. Социально-психологическое отношение субъекта к преступлению. – Л.: ЛГУ, 1970. – С. 159. (Dagel P.S., Kotov D.P. The subjective side of the crime and its establishment. - Voronezh: VGU, 1974. - S. 23-24; Filanovsky I.G. Socio-psychological attitude of the subject to the crime. - L .: LSU, 1970. - P. 159.)
Мирзаев У.М. Ўзлаштириш ёки растрата йўли билан талон-торож қилиш учун жавобгарлик. Монография //Масъул муҳаррир: ю.ф.д., проф. Б.Ж.Ахраров. – Т.: ТДЮИ нашриёти, 2011. – 275 бет. (Mirzaev U.M. Liability for embezzlement or plunder by way of rastrata. Monograph //Responsible editor: Ph.D., prof. B.J. Akhrarov. - T.: TDYuI publishing house, 2011. - 275 pages.)
Усмоналиев М. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик. – Тошкент: Янги аср авлоди, 2005. – Б. 218. (Usmonaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher educational institutions. - Tashkent: New age generation, 2005. - B. 218.)
Абдуллаев И. Ғаразнинг жиноий-ҳуқуқий баҳоланиши // Ҳаёт ва қонун. – Тошкент, 2004. - № 5. – Б. 11-13. (Abdullaev I. Criminological assessment of malice // Life and law. - Tashkent, 2004. - No. 5. - P. 11-13.)
К.Ҳакимов ВОПРОСЫ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ ОТДЕЛЬНЫХ СТАТЕЙ УГОЛОВНОГО КОДЕКСА В ПРОЦЕССЕ ДАЛЬНЕЙШЕГО УГЛУБЛЕНИЯ ДЕМОКРАТИЧЕСКИХ РЕФОРМ (СТАТЬИ 98,106 УК) // Review of law sciences. 2017. №1. URL (K.hakimov ISSUES OF IMPROVING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES OF THE CRIMINAL CODE IN THE PROCESS OF FURTHER DEMOCRATIC REFORMS (ARTICLES 98,106 of the Criminal Code) // Review of law sciences. 2017. No. 1. URL)
Ҳакимов К. ОСОБЕННОСТИ ЮРИДИЧЕСКОЙ КОНСТРУКЦИИ АФФЕКТА (СОСТОЯНИЕ СИЛЬНОГО ДУШЕВНОГО РАССТРОЙСТВА) КАК ОБЛЕГЧАЮЩЕГО ОБСТОЯТЕЛЬСТВА ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ И НАКАЗАНИЯ //Review of law sciences. – 2018. – №. 4. (Hakimov K. FEATURES OF THE LEGAL STRUCTURE OF AFFECT (STATE OF STRONG MENTAL DISORDER) AS A FACILITATION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND PUNISHMENT //Review of law sciences. – 2018. – no. four.)
