KESAR KESISH AMALIYOTIDAN SO‘NG BACHADON YOPISH USULINING REPRODUKTIV NATIJALARGA TA’SIRI
##article.subject##:
bachadon yopish; kesar kesish; reproduktiv yo‘qotishlar; ginekologik kasalliklar; kontratseptsiya##article.abstract##
18 yoshdan 42 yoshgacha bo‘lgan 496 nafar ayol ustida o‘rganish o‘tkazildi. Bachadon tikish usuliga qarab barcha bemorlar ikki guruhga bo‘lindi: 1-guruh – 240 (48%) ayolga modifikatsiyalangan bachadon tikish usuli qo‘llanilgan, 2-guruh – 256 (52%) ayolga esa an’anaviy tikish usuli qo‘llanilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari bachadon tikish usuli reproduktiv yo‘qotishlar chastotasi, intergenetik interval davomiyligi va ginekologik kasalliklar tez-tez uchrashiga ta’sir qilishi mumkinligini ko‘rsatdi. Modifikatsiyalangan tikish usuli qo‘llanilgan guruhda spontan abortlar, rivojlanmaydigan homiladorliklar va yallig‘lanish jarayonlari kamroq kuzatildi. Natijalar bachadon tikish texnikasini optimallashtirish reproduktiv natijalarni va bachadon chandiq mustahkamligini yaxshilash zaruriyatini tasdiqlaydi.
Библиографические ссылки
Всемирная организация здравоохранения (ВОЗ). Частота кесаревых сечений: глобальные тенденции и рекомендации. WHO, 2021.
Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, Van der Voet LF, et al. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(8):1097–1108. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15048.
Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, et al. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(3):219–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.013.
Roberge S, Demers S, Nguyen TM, et al. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.041.
Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: is thickness measurement sufficient to predict uterine rupture? J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(11):1445–1452.
Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, et al. Methods of cesarean section influence ultrasound findings of the uterine scar. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006;32(4):396–402. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00431.x.
Yazicioglu HF, Gokdogan A, Kelekci S, et al. The effect of single versus double-layer closure on residual myometrium thickness. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(9):545–549.
Hauth JC, Owen J, Varner MW, et al. Single-layer versus double-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the CORONIS randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(5):1428–1433.
Yasmin F, Ayaz A, Farooq S. Uterine rupture with previous caesarean section. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(4):322–325.
Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Association of single-layer closure of the low transverse cesarean incision with uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(1):16–18.
Batioglu S, Sahin Mutlu F, Unlu C, et al. Single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure technique and its impact on residual myometrial thickness. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 1998;4(2):107–110.
Ceci O, Cantatore C, Grasso S, et al. Influence of the suture technique on the healing of the uterine cesarean section: an ultrasonographic study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;161(1):5–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.10.030.
Bamberg C, Lato K, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Influence of cesarean section suturing technique on uterine scar healing assessed by transvaginal sonography. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(3):495–500.
Sood AK, Hauth JC, Owen J. Single-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: does method matter? Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5):994–998.
Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, et al. Single-layer closure of the uterus is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1367–1374.
Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N. Ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar defects: how and when? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(2):174–180.
Turan GA, Kuru O, Sahin C, et al. Effect of cesarean section technique on uterine scar healing: a prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(15):1513–1518.
CORONIS Collaborative Group. Cesarean section surgical techniques: 3-year follow-up of the CORONIS randomized trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):62–72.
