ASEAN DOIRASIDA MOJAROLARNI HAL QILISH MEXANIZMLARI VA XAVFSIZLIK HAMJAMIYATI
##article.subject##:
ASEAN, Janubi-Sharqiy Osiyo, xalqaro munosabatlar, xavfsizlik va barqarorlik strategik muhiti, mintaqaviy qarama-qarshiliklar, ASEAN Usuli (ASEAN Way), mojarolarni hal qilishdagi yondashuvlar##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada Janubi-Sharqiy Osiyodagi mintaqaviy qarama-qarshiliklarni hal etishda ASEAN mamlatlarining mexanizmlari hamda Xavfsizlik hamjamiyatining ahamiyati yoritilgan. Janubi-Sharqiy Osiyo mamlakatlarining muammolarni hal etishda mintaqaviy hamkorlikning o’ziga xos “ASEAN Usuli” tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, mojarolarni boshqarish mexanizmlari ASEAN tashkilotining yettita asosiy hujjatlari orqali aks ettirilgan.
Maqolada ASEANning nizolarni boshqarish jarayonida yuzaga keladigan yutuqlar va qiyinchiliklar aniqlandi. Tashkilotning Janubi-Sharqiy Osiyo mintaqasidagi nizolarni boshqarishga qo’shgan hissasi ochib berilgan. Muallif tomonidan mojarolarni boshqarishda ASEANning roli tahlil qilinib, a’zo davlatlar o’rtasidagi muammolarda tashkilot uchinchi vositachi tomon sifatida ishtirok etmasligi haqida ma’lumot berilgan. Xavfsizlik hamjamiyati mojarolarning oldini olish borasida o’zaro ishonchni mustahkamlash, keskinlikni yumshatish, a’zo davlatlar o’rtasida kelib chiqadigan nizolarning oldini olish va mavjud nizolarning avj olishiga yo’l qo’ymaslikka intiladi degan xulosa berildi.
Библиографические ссылки
Goh, E. 2012. “Institutions and the great power bargain in East Asia: ASEAN’s limited ‘brokerage role’”, Emmers, R. ed., ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia, London & New York: Routledge, p.105
Bernard Fook Weng Loo, “Transforming the Strategic Landscape of Southeast Asia”, Contemporary of Southeast Asia 27, no. 3 (2005), p. 391.
Edy Prasetyono, “NTS Challenges and Policy Responses in Indonesia”, a paper presented at the Inaugural Meeting for the Consortium on Non-Traditional Security Studies in Asia (NTS-Asia), Singapore, 8–9 January 2007.
Capie,D. 2012. “Explaining ASEAN’s resilience: Institutions, path dependency, and Asia’s emerging architecture”, Emmers, R. ed., ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia, London & New York: Routledge, p.168
Acharya, A. 2013. “ASEAN 2030: Challenges of Building a Mature Political and Security Community”, ADBI Working Paper Series #44, Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, October 2013.p.21
Acharya, A. 2009. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, Redwood City: Stanford University Press. p.54
Acharya, A. 2009. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, Redwood City: Stanford University Press. p.98
Askandar, K. (1994). ASEAN and Conflict Management: The Formative Years of 1967-1976. Pacifica Review 6(2), p.68.
Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality Declaration. Kuala Lumpur Declaration (Zone of Peace). http://www.asesansec.org/3629.htm
https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/
https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/
Rules of Procedure of the High Council of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (Rules of Procedure). http://www.asesansec.org/3639.htm
Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II) (ASEAN Concord 2). http://www.asesansec.org/15159.htm
ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action (ASEAN Security). http://www.asesansec.org/16826.htm
Amer, R. (2003). Conflict Management within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Assessing the Adoption of the ‘Rules of Procedure of the High Council of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia’.p.26
Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN Charter). http://www.aseansec.org/21069.pdf
Kim Hyung Jon. ASEAN Way and its implications and challenges for regional integration in Southeast Asia//Jati, Vol. 12, December 2007. P.25.
