KOGNITIV FAN RIVOJIDA BILIM VA FAOLIYAT DIALEKTIKASINING ILMIY-AMALIY AHAMIYATI
##article.subject##:
kognitiv fan, bilish jarayonlari, faoliyat, qaror qabul qilish, ratsional yondashuv, irratsional yondashuv, sun’iy intellekt, ta’lim, sog‘liqni saqlash, innovatsiyalar, tafakkur, ilmiy-amaliy ahamiyat, ijodkorlik, ijtimoiy taraqqiyot##article.abstract##
Ushbu maqolada kognitiv fan rivojida bilim va faoliyat
dialektikasining ilmiy-amaliy ahamiyati tahlil qilingan. Bilish jarayonlarining
falsafiy asoslari, ratsional va irratsional yondashuvlarning uyg‘unligi hamda
kognitiv fan paradigmalari doirasida bilim va faoliyatning dialektik bog‘liqligiga
e’tibor
qaratilgan.
Shuningdek,
maqolada kognitiv yondashuvlarning
innovatsiyalarni shakllantirish, inson faoliyatini takomillashtirish va jamiyat
taraqqiyotiga ta’siriga e’tibor qaratilgan. Kognitiv fan orqali inson bilish jarayonlari,
qaror qabul qilish, o‘rganish va ijodkorlik kabi faoliyatlar chuqur o‘rganilib, ularni
yanada samarali tashkil etish imkoniyatlari aniqlangan. Kognitiv fan nafaqat nazariy
asoslarni mustahkamlashga xizmat qilishi, balki sun’iy intellekt, ta’lim, sog‘liqni
saqlash va boshqaruv tizimlarida amaliyotga yo‘naltirilgan yechimlarni taklif
etishga xizmat qiladi. Maqola kognitiv yondashuvlarning innovatsiyalarni
rivojlantirish,
faoliyatni takomillashtirish va ijtimoiy taraqqiyotga hissa
qo‘shishdagi o‘rnini asoslashga qaratilgan.
Библиографические ссылки
Kant, Immanuel. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Friedrich Max Müller. 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan.
Breazeale, Daniel. (2013). “Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy and the Debate over Intuition.” Kantian Review 18, no. 1: p. 35–55.
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. (2006). “Kantian Themes in Contemporary Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 34, no. 1/2: p. 1–20.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (1969). Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Miller. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Harris, H. S. (1995). “The Relevance of Hegel's Logic.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 31, no. 1: р. 1–20.
Edmund Husserl, (2001). Logical Investigations, Volume II, translated by J. N. Findlay, edited by Dermot Moran (London: Routledge), р. 249.
Martin Heidegger, (1962). Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper & Row), р. 32.
Piaget, Jean. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. Translated by Margaret Cook. New York: International Universities Press. – р. 18.
Л. С. Выготский, (1934). Мышление и речь, под ред. А. Р. Лурия и Ф. Я. Янко-Триницкой (Москва: Соцэкгиз), c. 57.
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1962). Thought and Language. Translated and edited by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. – р. 153.
Поппер Карл Р (1983). Логика и рост научного знания / Под ред. Садовского В. Н. М.: Прогресс, с. 52
Husserl E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology / trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson. New York: Macmillan. – р. 52.
Daniel C. Dennett, (2023)."AI Agents Will Be Manipulation Engines," Wired, August 4, https://www.wired.com/story/ai-agents-personal-assistants manipulation-engines.
