SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL RELEVANCE OF THE DIALECTICS OF KNOWLEDGE AND PRAXIS IN DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE
Keywords:
cognitive science, epistemological processes, activity, decision making, rational approach, irrational approach, artificial intelligence (AI), education, healthcare, innovations, thought, creativity, social progressAbstract
The paper analyses the scientific-practical relevance of the
dialectics of knowledge and praxis in development of cognitive science. The
philosophical foundations of cognitive processes, the harmony of rational and
irrational approaches, and the dialectical relationship between knowledge and
activity within the paradigms of cognitive science have been highlighted.
Additionally, the article focuses on the impact of cognitive approaches in shaping
innovations, improving human activities, and contributing to societal progress.
Through cognitive science, human cognitive processes, decision-making, learning,
and creativity have been deeply studied, identifying opportunities to organize these
activities more effectively. Cognitive science not only serves to strengthen
theoretical foundations but also offers practical solutions aimed at applications in
artificial intelligence, education, healthcare, and management systems. The article aims to substantiate the role of cognitive approaches in advancing innovation,
enhancing activity, and contributing to social development.
References
Kant, Immanuel. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Friedrich Max Müller. 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan.
Breazeale, Daniel. (2013). “Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy and the Debate over Intuition.” Kantian Review 18, no. 1: p. 35–55.
Westphal, Kenneth R. (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. (2006). “Kantian Themes in Contemporary Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 34, no. 1/2: p. 1–20.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (1969). Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Miller. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Harris, H. S. (1995). “The Relevance of Hegel's Logic.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 31, no. 1: р. 1–20.
Edmund Husserl, (2001). Logical Investigations, Volume II, translated by J. N. Findlay, edited by Dermot Moran (London: Routledge), р. 249.
Martin Heidegger, (1962). Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper & Row), р. 32.
Piaget, Jean. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. Translated by Margaret Cook. New York: International Universities Press. – р. 18.
Л. С. Выготский, (1934). Мышление и речь, под ред. А. Р. Лурия и Ф. Я. Янко-Триницкой (Москва: Соцэкгиз), c. 57.
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1962). Thought and Language. Translated and edited by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. – р. 153.
Поппер Карл Р (1983). Логика и рост научного знания / Под ред. Садовского В. Н. М.: Прогресс, с. 52
Husserl E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology / trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson. New York: Macmillan. – р. 52.
Daniel C. Dennett, (2023)."AI Agents Will Be Manipulation Engines," Wired, August 4, https://www.wired.com/story/ai-agents-personal-assistants manipulation-engines.
