ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CEMENT AND SCREW FIXATION DURING PROSTHETICS ON IMPLANTS
Keywords:
Screw fixation, cement fixation, artificial dentures, dental implant, passive fitAbstract
In dentistry, the longcy of the functioning of structures has always been relevant. To understand in what situation, it is better to apply a screw or cement fixation during prosthetics on dental implants. This review article studied articles of various authors, about their research in the field of fixing artificial crowns for dental implants using screw and cement fixation. Each researcher highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each system. When screw fixation requires a x-ray study to make sure the superstructure of the suprastructure to the implant. In case of cement fixation, in addition to x-ray examination, careful removal of cement residues is otherwise needed problems with soft tissues around the implant.
References
The COMPARISON OF CEMENT AND SCREW-RETAINED CROWNS FROM TECHNICAL AND BIOLOGICAL POINTS OF VIEW. Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (2): pp.44-50.
The Influence of Two Different Cements on Remaining Cement Excess In Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns. An in vitro Study. Hidalgo J, Baghernejad D, Falk A, Larsson C. BDJ Open. 2021 Jan 28; 7 (1): 5. DOI: 10.1038 / S41405-021-00063-8.
Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (2): 44-50. T.N., Arutyunov S.D., Volozhin A.I., Ibrahimov T.I., Lebedenko I.Yu., Levin G.G., Losev F. F., Malginov N.N., Chumachenko E.N., Yanushevich Oh. Creation of scientific foundations, development and introduction into the clinical practice of computer modeling of therapeutic technologies and predictions for the rehabilitation of patients with maxillofacial defects and dental diseases // Moscow. - 2010. – p.144.
Kalyakin A.B. The state of the periodontal is depending on the design material of the non-removable prosthesis // Author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences Voronezh, - 2010, - p.25.
Kolkov A.B. Prosthetics of patients with small dental defective defects with bridges with a glass reference element // Author's abstract. Diss. Kand.Med.Nuk Tver - 2011.-p.18.
A Systematic Review of Screw Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions.Hamed Mt, Abdullah Mously H, Khalid Alamoudi S, Hossam Hashem Ab, Hussein Naguib G. CLIN COSMET INVESTIG DENT. 2020 Jan 14; 12: 9-16. DOI: 10.2147 / CCIDE.S231070. Ecollection 2020.
Kochkonyan TS Features of changing the factors of anti-radical protection of oral fluid and blood with various types of dental prosthetics // Author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences, -Krasnodar, -2010, -p. 25.
Screw Retained VS. Cement Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis. Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP, Brägger U. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb; 73 (1): 141-151. DOI: 10.1111 / PRD.12168.
Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Prosthodtic Maintenance and Complications. MA S, Fenton A. int j prsthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr; 28 (2): 127-45. DOI: 10.11607 / IJP.3947.
Evaluation of Cement-Retained Versus Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lemos Ca, De Souza Batista Ve, Almeida Da, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr; 115 (4): 419-27. DOI: 10.1016 / J.ProsDent.2015.08.026. EPUB 2015 NOV 14.
Hwan V.I. Laboratory and experimental rationale for orthopedic treatment with dentures with support for fiberglass and dioxidcyarconium suprastructures // Author. diss. Kand. honey. Sciences, - Moscow, -2010, - p.22.
Retention Failures in Cement- and Screw-Retained Fixed Restorations on Dental Implants in Partially Edentulous Arches: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Jain JK, Sethuraman R, Chauhan S, Javiya P, Srivastava S, Patel R, Bhalani B. J Indian Prsthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-SEP; 18 (3): 201-211. DOI: 10.4103 / jips.jips_25_18.
Complications of Screw- and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Full-Arch Reviews: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gaddale R, Mishra Sk, Chowdhary R. INT J Oral Implantol (BERL). 2020; 13 (1): 11-40.
Mechanical Performance of Cement - and Screw-Retained All-Ceramic Single Crowns on Dental Implants. Obermeier M, Ristow O, Erdelt K, Beuer F. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 MAR; 22 (2): 981-991. DOI: 10.1007 / S00784-017-2178-Z. EPUB 2017 Jul 15.
Hitarishvili M.V. Improving the diagnosis of causative agents of periodsplants using molecular genetic research methods // Author's author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences Moscow - 2012 – p.26.
Clinical Performance of Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Reviews - A Systematic Review. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. INT J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: pp.84-98.
Nakamura T., Ohyama T., Imanishi A. et al. Fracture Resistance of Pressable Glass-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures // J. Oral Rehabil. 2015. Vol. 29, No. 10.-p. 951 - 955.
WERLING G. VITABLOCS REALLIFE NEW for high-nesthetic restoration of the tooth of the front group // Maestro dentistry. 2011. - № 3 (43). - P. 36 - 37.
Danilina T.F., Zhidovinov A.B., Poroshin A.B., Tails S.N., Mayborod A.Yu. Diagnostic capabilities of the oral cavity in patients with metallic orthopedic structures // Modern high-tech technologies 2012 - No. 2 - p.49-51.
Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant Reviews: A Systematic Review Of The Survival and Complication Rates. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6: pp.163-201
Danilina T.F., Mikhalchenko D.V., Zhigovinov A.B., Poroshin A.B., Tailov S.N., Visaraban A.B. Method of diagnosing the intolerance of orthopedic structures in the oral cavity // Successes of modern natural science 2013 - № 1.- p.46-48
TECHNIQUES FOR RETRIEVABILITY AND FOR REGISERING SCREW ACCESS HOLES IN CEMENT-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESSES: A SCOPING Review of the Literature. Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tine
