ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА И НЕДОСТАТКИ ЦЕМЕНТНОЙ И ВИНТОВОЙ ФИКСАЦИИ ПРИ ПРОТЕЗИРОВАНИИ НА ИМПЛАНТАТАХ
Ключевые слова:
Винтовая фиксация, цементная фиксация, искусственная коронка, дентальный имплантат, пассивная припасовкаАннотация
В стоматологии всегда была актуальна долговременность функционирования конструкций. В этой обзорной статье изучены статьи различных авторов, об их исследованиях в области фиксации искусственных коронок на дентальных имплантатах с помощью винтовой и цементной фиксации. Каждый исследователь выделяет преимущества и недостатки каждой системы. При винтовой фиксации необходимо рентгенологическое исследование чтобы удостовериться в правильности припасовки супраконструкции к имплантату. При цементной фиксации, кроме рентгенологического исследования требуется тщательное удаление остатков цемента в противном случае могут возникнуть проблемы с мягкими тканями вокруг имплантата.
Библиографические ссылки
The COMPARISON OF CEMENT AND SCREW-RETAINED CROWNS FROM TECHNICAL AND BIOLOGICAL POINTS OF VIEW. Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (2): pp.44-50.
The Influence of Two Different Cements on Remaining Cement Excess In Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns. An in vitro Study. Hidalgo J, Baghernejad D, Falk A, Larsson C. BDJ Open. 2021 Jan 28; 7 (1): 5. DOI: 10.1038 / S41405-021-00063-8.
Stomatologija. 2017; 19 (2): 44-50. T.N., Arutyunov S.D., Volozhin A.I., Ibrahimov T.I., Lebedenko I.Yu., Levin G.G., Losev F. F., Malginov N.N., Chumachenko E.N., Yanushevich Oh. Creation of scientific foundations, development and introduction into the clinical practice of computer modeling of therapeutic technologies and predictions for the rehabilitation of patients with maxillofacial defects and dental diseases // Moscow. - 2010. – p.144.
Kalyakin A.B. The state of the periodontal is depending on the design material of the non-removable prosthesis // Author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences Voronezh, - 2010, - p.25.
Kolkov A.B. Prosthetics of patients with small dental defective defects with bridges with a glass reference element // Author's abstract. Diss. Kand.Med.Nuk Tver - 2011.-p.18.
A Systematic Review of Screw Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions.Hamed Mt, Abdullah Mously H, Khalid Alamoudi S, Hossam Hashem Ab, Hussein Naguib G. CLIN COSMET INVESTIG DENT. 2020 Jan 14; 12: 9-16. DOI: 10.2147 / CCIDE.S231070. Ecollection 2020.
Kochkonyan TS Features of changing the factors of anti-radical protection of oral fluid and blood with various types of dental prosthetics // Author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences, -Krasnodar, -2010, -p. 25.
Screw Retained VS. Cement Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis. Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP, Brägger U. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb; 73 (1): 141-151. DOI: 10.1111 / PRD.12168.
Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review of Prosthodtic Maintenance and Complications. MA S, Fenton A. int j prsthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr; 28 (2): 127-45. DOI: 10.11607 / IJP.3947.
Evaluation of Cement-Retained Versus Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lemos Ca, De Souza Batista Ve, Almeida Da, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr; 115 (4): 419-27. DOI: 10.1016 / J.ProsDent.2015.08.026. EPUB 2015 NOV 14.
Hwan V.I. Laboratory and experimental rationale for orthopedic treatment with dentures with support for fiberglass and dioxidcyarconium suprastructures // Author. diss. Kand. honey. Sciences, - Moscow, -2010, - p.22.
Retention Failures in Cement- and Screw-Retained Fixed Restorations on Dental Implants in Partially Edentulous Arches: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Jain JK, Sethuraman R, Chauhan S, Javiya P, Srivastava S, Patel R, Bhalani B. J Indian Prsthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-SEP; 18 (3): 201-211. DOI: 10.4103 / jips.jips_25_18.
Complications of Screw- and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Full-Arch Reviews: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gaddale R, Mishra Sk, Chowdhary R. INT J Oral Implantol (BERL). 2020; 13 (1): 11-40.
Mechanical Performance of Cement - and Screw-Retained All-Ceramic Single Crowns on Dental Implants. Obermeier M, Ristow O, Erdelt K, Beuer F. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 MAR; 22 (2): 981-991. DOI: 10.1007 / S00784-017-2178-Z. EPUB 2017 Jul 15.
Hitarishvili M.V. Improving the diagnosis of causative agents of periodsplants using molecular genetic research methods // Author's author. diss. Cand. honey. Sciences Moscow - 2012 – p.26.
Clinical Performance of Screw- Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Reviews - A Systematic Review. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. INT J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: pp.84-98.
Nakamura T., Ohyama T., Imanishi A. et al. Fracture Resistance of Pressable Glass-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures // J. Oral Rehabil. 2015. Vol. 29, No. 10.-p. 951 - 955.
WERLING G. VITABLOCS REALLIFE NEW for high-nesthetic restoration of the tooth of the front group // Maestro dentistry. 2011. - № 3 (43). - P. 36 - 37.
Danilina T.F., Zhidovinov A.B., Poroshin A.B., Tails S.N., Mayborod A.Yu. Diagnostic capabilities of the oral cavity in patients with metallic orthopedic structures // Modern high-tech technologies 2012 - No. 2 - p.49-51.
Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant Reviews: A Systematic Review Of The Survival and Complication Rates. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6: pp.163-201
Danilina T.F., Mikhalchenko D.V., Zhigovinov A.B., Poroshin A.B., Tailov S.N., Visaraban A.B. Method of diagnosing the intolerance of orthopedic structures in the oral cavity // Successes of modern natural science 2013 - № 1.- p.46-48
TECHNIQUES FOR RETRIEVABILITY AND FOR REGISERING SCREW ACCESS HOLES IN CEMENT-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESSES: A SCOPING Review of the Literature. Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tine
