RAQAMLI DAVRDA DIPLOMATIYA VA DIPLOMATIK HUQUQ
##article.subject##:
e-diplomatiya, virtual diplomatiya, raqamli diplomatiya, kibernetika, “kiber”, kibermakon, virtual elchixona, vebinar, videokonferensaloqa, aralash vakillik, diskret, inkluziv, iure imperii, iure gestionis, traveaux préparatoires, press-reliz, interaktiv muloqot, onlayn muzokara##article.abstract##
Internet davri diplomatik huquqini o‘rganish zarurati yuqori bo‘lgan dolzarb masaladir. Bu avvalo - davr talabi. Hozirgi davrda diplomatik huquq norma ijodkorligida va huquqni qo‘llash amaliyotida o‘sib borayotgan raqamli talablar o‘z ifodasini yana-da yaqqol topishi lozim. Shu bilan birga diplomatik huquqdagi klassik jihatlarni saqlab qolish ham muhim masaladir. Zero, diplomatiya va diplomatik huquq tarixiy jihatdan odat normalariga, anʼanaviylikka hamda barqarorlikka tayanib kelgan. Ushbu jihatlar diplomatik huquqning boshqa huquq tarmoqlaridan keskin ajratib turadi. Mazkur maqolada aynan mana shu masalalar har taraflama ochib berilgan.
Библиографические ссылки
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, ‘The Internet is 20% of economic growth’ Business Insider (24-May 2011) accessed 09 November 2013.
Ashley NunesAutomation. Doesn’t Just Create or Destroy Jobs – It Transforms Them https://hbr.org/2021/11/automation-doesnt-just-create-or-destroy-jobs-it-transforms-them
N. Weiner, Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965).
Council of Europe, Convention on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001
Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000 Presidency Conclusions accessed 09 November 2013.
Geneva 2003 (Geneva Declaration of Principles and Geneva Plan of Action) and Tunis 2005 (Tunis Commitment and Tunis Agenda for the Information Society) accessed 10 November 2013; For the research on the use of prefixes in the WSIS and IGF processes, see DiploFoundation’s research project ‘Emerging Language of Internet Diplomacy’ Diplo (Malta, 2013) accessed 09 November 2013.
European Commission, A Digital Agenda for Europe - Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (26 August 2010) COM/2010/0245 f/2 accessed 18 October 2013.
Foreign Commonwealth Office, Foreign Commonwealth Office Digital Diplomacy (no date) accessed 18 October 2013.
J.D. Bolter, Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age (London: Duckworth, 1984).
J. Kurbalija, An Introduction to Internet Governance (Malta: DiploFoundation, 2011).: Birahayu D. Maritime Digital Diplomacy: Legal Revitalization and Reform of Modern and Solutive Diplomacy //Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ). – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 3. – С. 170-184.
V. Camilleri, How Small States Influence Diplomatic Practice: A Look at The Fourth Round of Accession Negotiations to the European Union (Paper presented at the International Conference on the Diplomacy of Small States, Malta, 8-9 February) accessed 18 April 2013.
A.Henriksen, ‘Diplomacy and Small States in Today’s World’ in The face of man, Vol. 2, The Dr. Eric Williams Memorial Lectures 1993 – 2004 (Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago, 2005) accessed 18 April 2012.; A.N. Mohamed, ‘The Diplomacy of Micro-States' (Clingendael Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, No. 78. 2002) accessed 18 April 2012.; Maltese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accessed on 11 November 2013.
‘How will Wikileaks affect diplomacy?’ Diplo (Geneva, 1 December 2010). accessed 09 November 2013.
Almuftah H., Weerakkody V., Sivarajah U. e-Diplomacy: A systematic literature review //Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. – 2016. – С. 131-134.
Nweke E. N. Diplomacy in Era of Digital Governance: Theory and Impact //Information and Knowledge Management. – 2012. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 22-26.; A. Marchukov, Science Journal of Volgograd State University: History. Area Studies. International Relations 4 (28), 106 (2014) [Google Scholar]
Al-Muftah H. et al. Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: Exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling //Government Information Quarterly. – 2018. – Т. 35. – №. 3. – С. 502-514.; L. Permyakova, Digital diplomacy: directions, risks and tools (2012) URL: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/tsifrovaya-diplomatiya-napravleniya-raboty-riski-i-instrumen/ (date of access: 15.02.2018) [Google Scholar]
C. Bjola, Trends and counter-trends in digital diplomacy (2017) URL: https://medium.com/digital-diplomacy/trends-and-counter-trends-in-digital-diplomacy-f1f2c1625f26 (date of access: 20.07.2017) [Google Scholar] Hanson, F. 2012. A Digital DFAT: Joining the 21st century. Lowy Institute.; Digital strategy. 2012, foreign and commonwealth office, UK,. DOI = www.gov.uk/fco; Batora, J. 2008. Foreign ministries and the information revolution: Going virtual. USA, Boston.; Kuźniar E., Filimoniuk N. E-Diplomacy on Twitter. International comparison of strategies and effectivity //Social Communication. – 2018. – Т. 3. – №. 2. – С. 34-41.
