КОНСУЛЛИК ҲИМОЯСИНИ АМАЛГА ОШИРИШ БЎЙИЧА ЧЕТ ДАВЛАТЛАР ТАЖРИБАСИНИНГ ҲУҚУҚИЙ ТАҲЛИЛИ

##article.authors##

  • Гафурова Севара Алишеровна
  • Алишерхонов Боситхон

##article.subject##:

консуллик конвенцияси, консул, консуллик ҳимояси, ЕИ директивалари, халқаро шартнома, консуллик муассасаси, давлат бошқаруви, маъмурий ислоҳот, ҳуқуқий тизим, миграция, меҳнат мигранти

##article.abstract##

Мақолада сўнгги ўн йилликлар давомида консуллик ҳимоясини ўзига хос хусусиятлари ва фарқлари билан ажралиб турадиган муҳим ижтимоий-ҳуқуқий ҳодиса сифатида кўплаб мамлакатлар тажрибасини айнан ҳозирги ижтимоий-ҳуқуқий шароитларида андоза бўла оладиган жиҳатлари ўрганилган. Изланувчилар ўз тадқиқотлари жараёнида, ҳозирги кунда халқаро ҳамжамиятда халқаро ҳуқуқ субъектлари ўз манфаатини ва фаровонлигини таъминлаш учун бошқа мамлакатлар билан консуллик муносабатлари соҳасида ҳамкорликни кучайтириши керак, деган фикрга келадилар.

Библиографические ссылки

Go G. D. Philippine Government Policies Towards Chinese Immigration (1949–1975) //TALA: An Online Journal of History. – 2021. – Т. 4. – №. 2. Р. 86-87.

Abeysekera D. S. D. J. Rural to rural migration in Sri Lanka //Rural Migration in Developing Nations. – Routledge, 2019. – С. 109-207.

Marta J. et al. Understanding migration motives and its impact on household welfare: evidence from rural–urban migration in Indonesia //Regional Studies, Regional Science. – 2020. – Т. 7. – №. 1. – С. 118-132.

Bryan G., Morten M. The aggregate productivity effects of internal migration: Evidence from Indonesia //Journal of Political Economy. – 2019. – Т. 127. – №. 5. – С. 2229-2268.

Orrenius P. M., Saving J., Zavodny M. 2. An Economic Perspective on US Immigration Policy vis-à-vis Mexico //Mexican Migration to the United States. – University of Texas Press, 2021. – С. 37-53.

Obinna D. N. Seeking sanctuary: violence against women in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala //Violence against women. – 2021. – Т. 27. – №. 6-7. – С. 806-827.

Mitchell J., Coutin S. B. Living documents in transnational spaces of migration between El Salvador and the United States //Law & Social Inquiry. – 2019. – Т. 44. – №. 4. – С. 865-892.

Alex Oliver. “Travelling responsibly, but further to go: Australia’s new consular diplomacy”. // Issue 6 of the Australian Journal of International Affairs titled Australia's New Consular Diplomacy. Volume 70. 2017. Р. 78

Zhang X., Mu L., Shannon J. The relationship between older adult migration and destination characteristics in Georgia //Applied Geography. – 2021. – Т. 132. – С. 1024.

Bailey A. J., Drbohlav D., Salukvadze J. Migration and pastoral power through life course: Evidence from Georgia //Geoforum. – 2018. – Т. 91. – С. 97-107.

Yüksel S. et al. Measuring international migration in Azerbaijan //Sustainability. – 2018. – Т. 10. – №. 1. – С. 132.

Bayramov S. V. et al. Modeling the assessment of the connection of migration and economic development: Case of Azerbaijan //Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR). – 2021. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 110-120.

Peters A. Individual Rights in Consular Law. In J. Huston (Trans.), Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, pp. 348-387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016.

Загрузки

##submissions.published##

2022-05-14