ENSURING THE RIGHT OF THE SUSPECT TO GET ACQUAINTED WITH THE CASE MATERIALS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS

Authors

  • Mavlanov Kamoliddin Tuychievich

Keywords:

the suspect, the evidence, the materials of the criminal case, protection, crime investigation.

Abstract

This article is aimed at protecting the rights and legitimate interests of a suspect in the course of criminal proceedings, during which it is his right to protection that has been investigated. Awareness of persons defending their interests in criminal proceedings, based on the materials of work at the early stages of the process, affects the effective organization of protection. The subject, who is obliged to prove, will have to provide the suspect with sufficient time and conditions to organize his defense. The article uses a comparative analysis to study the current state of our national criminal procedure legislation on the relevant issue, the experience of developed foreign countries.

References

Shmul Leshem. The benefits of a right to silence for the innocent. Rand journal of economics. Vol. 41, No.2, Summer 2010. Pp 399. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40649305?read-now=1&seq=2#page_scan_tab_contents

Human Rights Standards and Practice for the Police. Expanded Pocket Book on Human Rights for the Police. New York and Geneva, 2004. https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/training5add3en.pdf

Gathering evidence. https://www.britannica.com/topic/crime-law/Trial-procedure

Chrisje Brants & Stijn Franken. The protection of fundamental human rights in criminal process.General report. p.9.https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.102/.

Anneli Soo, PhD and Anna Pivaty, PhD. Access to the Case Materials in Pre-Trial Stages Critical Questions of Article 7 of Directive 2012/13/EU on the Right to Information in Criminal Proceedings. https://eucrim.eu/media/issue/pdf/eucrim_issue_2019-01.pdf#page=60

ECtHR, 28 July 2005, Czarnecki v. Poland, Appl. no. 75112/01, para. 37

ECtHR, 19 February 2009, A. and others v. the UK, Appl. no. 3455/05, para. 204

ECtHR, A. and others v. the UK, op. cit. (n. 9), para. 205

The right to a fair trial: part i – from investigation to trial.- p. 248. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training9chapter6en.pdf

https://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/Criminal-Proceedings-and-Defence-Rights-in-Sweden.pdf

Christoffer Wong.Overview of Swedish Criminal Procedure. January 2012.-p.32. https://www.congreso.es/docu/docum/ddocum/dosieres/sleg/legislatura_10/spl_85/pdfs/24.pdf

Katalin Ligeti. Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Volume 1: A Comparative Analysis.-p 776. 2012. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Being a party to a criminal process. https://syyttajalaitos.fi/en/being-a-party-to-a-criminal-process

Criminal Records Act. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2011/en20110805_20150736.pdf

https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/8371/file/Estonia_CPC_as_of_2019_ru.pdf

https://kodeksy.by/ugolovno-processualnyy-kodeks/statya-41

Published

2021-08-27