SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE PARTICIPATION OF AN INTERPRETER IN CIVIL COURT PROCEEDINGS
Keywords:
civil court proceedings, interpreter, procedural status, language rights, judicial guarantees, adversarial principle, openness of judicial proceedings, equality of the parties, procedural obligationsAbstract
This article examines the specific features of the participation of an interpreter in civil court proceedings, his or her procedural status, and the significance of such participation in ensuring justice in civil adjudication from both theoretical and practical perspectives. In particular, it analyzes the necessity of involving an interpreter in situations where the parties do not know the language of the proceedings or do not possess sufficient proficiency therein, as well as the interpreter’s rights and duties, issues of legal liability, and procedural safeguards. The article further analyzes the role of the interpreter in civil proceedings on the basis of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, providing a scholarly interpretation of their legal nature and content. It also reveals how the participation of an interpreter ensures the implementation of the principles of equality of the parties, openness of judicial proceedings, and adversarial procedure.
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 23.01.2018-y. (Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative documents, 23.01.2018)
Треушников, М.К. Гражданский процесс. Москва: Городец, 2014. (Treushnikov, M.K. Civil process. Moscow: Gorodets, 2014)
Ярков, В.В. Гражданский процесс. Москва: Статут, 2016. (Yarkov, V.V. Civil process. Moscow: Statut, 2016)
Bulow, Oskar von. Gesetz und Richteramt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1995.
Zuckerman, Adrian A.S. Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice. London: Sweet-Maxwell, 2013.
Abdusamadov D. Sudlov ishlari yuritiladigan til tamoyilining konstitutsiyaviy kafolatlari. Журнал академических исследований нового Узбекистана, 2(8), 28–31. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/58772 (Abdusamadov D. Constitutional guarantees of the principle of the language of judicial proceedings. Journal of academic studies of new Uzbekistan, 2(8), 28–31. retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/58772)
Yo‘ldoshev S. Sud ishlarida tarjimon instituti: huquqiy asoslar va amaliy muammolar. — T.: “Adolat”, 2019. (Yuldoshev S. The Institute of Interpreters in Judicial Proceedings: Legal Basis and Practical Problems. — T.: “Adolat”, 2019)
European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a Fair Trial (Civil Limb). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2022.
Kelsen, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre (Sof huquq nazariyasi). Wien: Franz Deuticke, (2-nashr).
Сахнова, Т.В. Гражданский процесс: теория и практика. Москва: Вольтерс Клувер, 2008. (Sakhnova, T.V. Civil procedure: theory and practice. Moscow: Walters Kluwer, 2008)
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksi. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Kengashining Axborotnomasi, 1995-y. (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative documents, Bulletin of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1995)
Магомадова Эльза Исаевна. Проблемы привлечения переводчика в судебном производстве в России // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2019. №5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-privlecheniya-perevodchika-v-sudebnom-proizvodstve-v-rossii. (Elza Isaevna Magomadova. Problemy privlecheniya perevodchika v sudebnom proizvodstve v Rossii // Humanitarnye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2019. No. 5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-privlecheniya-perevodchika-v-sudebnom-proizvodstve-v-rossii)
“Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems” (Council of Europe, CEPEJ, 2018).
Пирматов Отабек. Разрешение споров в режиме онлайн это новый этап виртуализации гражданского судопроизводства // Review of law sciences. 2020. №Спецвыпуск. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razreshenie-sporov-v-rezhime-onlayn-eto-novyy-etap-virtualizatsii-grazhdanskogo-sudoproizvodstva. (Pirmatov Otabek. Razreshenie sporov v regime online eto novyy etap virtualizatsii grajdanskogo sudoproizvodstva // Review of law sciences. 2020. #Spetsvypusk. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razreshenie-sporov-v-rezhime-online-eto-novyy-etap-virtualizatsii-grazhdanskogo-sudoproizvodstva)
Richard Susskind. “Online Courts and the Future of Justice”, Oxford University Press, 2019.
