NON-GOVERNMENT NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AS SUBJECTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: SOME ISSUES OF STATE REGISTRATION
Keywords:
“Effective Governance”, “Service state”, non-governmental non-profit organizations, “third sector”, public councils, parliamentary control, social projects, subject of administrative law, social partnership, administrative proceduresAbstract
In recent years, concrete measures have been taken to support non-governmental non-profit organizations, which are the main institutions of civil society, create conditions for them, ensure freedom of activity, strengthen social partnership between State bodies and them, and improve the legal framework governing this area. To increase the role of non-governmental non-profit organizations in the decentralization of public administration based on the concepts of “Compact and effective public administration” and “Good governance” in the world, to expand the participation of non-governmental non-profit organizations in the field of services provided by the state based on the theory of "Service to the state", to increase the participation of non-governmental non-profit organizations in the implementation of social projects, improving the trends of increasing innovative methods. Therefore, an important task is to study the position of non-governmental non-profit organizations as subjects of administrative law from a scientific and theoretical point of view. It is also important to study the participation of non-governmental non-profit organizations in relations related to administrative procedures. It is also relevant to study the participation of non-profit organizations in relations related to administrative procedures.
References
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Кенгашининг Ахборотномаси, 1994 й., 1-сон, 5-модда. (Bulletin of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1994, No. 1, Article 5.)
Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 05.05.2018 й., 06/18/5430/1164-сон, 13.12.2018 й., 06/18/5597/2300-сон, 11.12.2019 й., 06/19/5892/4134-сон. (National database of legal documents, 05.05.2018, No. 06/18/5430/1164, 13.12.2018, No. 06/18/5597/2300, 11.12.2019, 06/19/5892/4134)
Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 09.01.2018 й., 03/18/457/0525-сон; 07.01.2020 й., 03/20/600/0023-сон. (National database of legal documents, 09.01.2018, No. 03/18/457/0525; 07.01.2020, No. 03/20/600/0023)
Фукуяма Ф. Сильное государство : Управление и мировой порядок в XXI веке. М. : АСТ: АСТ Москва; Владимир : ВКТ, 2010. С. 121. (Fukuyama F. A Strong state : Governance and world order in the XXI century. M. : AST: AST Moscow; Vladimir : VKT, 2010. p. 121)
Хайек Ф. Право, законодательство и свобода: современное понимание либеральных принципов справедливости и политики М.Челябинск : ИРИСЭН, Социум, 2016. С. 337. (Hayek F. Law, legislation and freedom: a modern understanding of the liberal principles of justice and politics M. Chelyabinsk : IRISEN, Sotsium, 2016. P. 337)
Каменева В.М. Правовое регулирование деятельности некоммерческих организаций в Российской Федерации (административный и финансовый аспекты) //Вестник Московского университета МВД России. – 2007. – №. 4. – С. 82-84. (Kameneva V.M. Legal regulation of activities of non-profit organizations in the Russian Federation (administrative and financial aspects) // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. - 2007. - no. 4. - S. 82-84.)
Старилов Ю. Н. Курс общего административного права: в 3 т. Т. 1: История //Наука. Предмет. Нормы. Субъекты/ЮН Старилов.–М.: Норма. – 2002. – Т. 728. – С. 11.( Starilov Yu. N. The course of general administrative law: in 3 volumes. T. 1: History // Science. Item. Norms. Subjects/YUN Starilov.–M.: Norma. - 2002. - T. 728. - S. 11.)
Маъмурий ҳуқуқ ва процесс // С.А.Муратаев, Б.Т.Мусаев, Д.Р.Артиков. Дарслик/. Тошкент: “Innovatsiya-Ziyo”, 2020, – Б. 19-20. (Administrative law and prosess / / S.A.Murataev, B.T.Musaev, D.R.Artikov. Textbook/. Tashkent:" Innovation-Ziyo", 2020 – B. 19-20.)
Административное право (Общая часть) И.А.Хамедов, Л.Б.Хван, И.М.Цай. 2012 г. – Т.: Изд-во Konsoulauditinform-Nashr – С. 78. (Administrative Law (General part) I.A.Hamedov, L.B.Hwang, I.M.Tsai. 2012 – T.: Publishing house Konsoulauditinform-Nashr – p. 78)
Манохин В. М., Адушкин Ю. С. Российское административное право. – 2003. – С. 27-28. (Manokhin V. M., Adushkin Yu. S. Russian administrative law. 2003. S. 27-28.)
Бурмистрова Т., Мартыненко Г. Методы и практика антимонопольного регулирования действий исполнительных органов власти // Право и экономика. – 2000. № 2.С.19. (Burmistrova.T., Martynenko G. Methods and practice of antimonopoly regulation of the actions of executive authorities // Law and Economics. 2000. №2. p.19.)
Неъматов Ж.Н. Суд-ҳуқуқ ислоҳотлари шароитида маъмурий тартиб-таомиллар тўғрисидаги қонун ҳужжатларини такомиллаштириш масалалари. Қонун устуворлигини таъминлаш ва суд-ҳуқуқ тизимини янада ислоҳ қилишнинг устувор йўналишлари (Мақолалар тўплами) / Масъул муҳаррир Е.В.Коленко. –Тошкент, “TOP IMAGE MEDIA” 2020. –536 б. (Ne'matov J.N. Issues of improvement of legislation on administrative procedures in the context of judicial reform. Priorities for ensuring the rule of law and further reform of the judicial system (collection of Articles) / Editor in charge E.V.Kolenko. - Tashkent, "TOP IMAGE MEDIA" 2020. -536 b.)
Неъматов Ж.Н. Суд-ҳуқуқ ислоҳотлари шароитида маъмурий тартиб-таомиллар тўғрисидаги қонун ҳужжатларини такомиллаштириш масалалари. Қонун устуворлигини таъминлаш ва суд-ҳуқуқ тизимини янада ислоҳ қилишнинг устувор йўналишлари (Мақолалар тўплами) / Масъул муҳаррир Е.В.Коленко. –Тошкент, “TOP IMAGE MEDIA” 2020. –536 б. (Ne'matov J.N. Issues of improvement of legislation on administrative procedures in the context of judicial reform. Priorities for ensuring the rule of law and further reform of the judicial system (collection of Articles) / Editor in charge E.V.Kolenko. - Tashkent, "TOP IMAGE MEDIA" 2020. -536 b.)
Balla S. J. Administrative procedures and political control of the bureaucracy //American Political Science Review. – 1998. – С. 663-673.
Howard N. Fenton. Where too little judicial deference can impair the administrative process: the case of Ukraine // Comparative Administrative Law. SusanRose-Ackerman, PeterL.Lindseth. EdwardElgar 2010. – P 483–486.
De Figueiredo Jr R. J. P., Spiller P. T., Urbiztondo S. An informational perspective on administrative procedures //Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. – 1999. – Т. 15. – №. 1. – С. 283-305.
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Мажлисининг Ахборотномаси, 1999 й., 5-сон, 115-модда. (Bulletin Of The Parliament Of The Republic Of Uzbekistan, 1999, No. 5, Article 115.)
Вазирлар Маҳкамасининг 2014 йил 10 мартдаги 57-сон қарорига 1-Илова Нодавлат нотижорат ташкилотларини давлат рўйхатидан ўтказиш тартиби тўғрисидаги низом. Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 12.10.2017 й., 09/17/810/0095. (Annex 1 to the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 57 dated March 10, 2014 Regulation on the procedure for state registration of non-governmental non-profit organizations. National database of legal documents, 12.10.2017, 09/17/810/0095.)
Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 09.01.2018 й., 03/18/457/0525-сон. (National database of legal documents, 09.01.2018, No. 03/18/457/0525.)
Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 09.01.2018 й., 03/18/457/0525-сон; 07.01.2020 й., 03/20/600/0023-сон. (National database of legal documents, 09.01.2018, No. 03/18/457/0525; 07.01.2020, No. 03/20/600/0023)
