INSTITUTE OF RECONCILIATION IS AN IMPORTANT SIGN OF THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF CRIMINAL LEGISLATION
Keywords:
institution of reconciliation, agreement, crime, criminal punishment, responsibility, the suspect, the accused, court, damage, lawsuitAbstract
Article 661 of the Criminal Code (Exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation) and Chapter 62 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Proceedings on reconciliation cases) were introduced by Law No. 254-II of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated August 29, 2001. This case is at the stage of proceedings before the court, and the volume of work in the courts has been reduced, an opportunity has been created to give greater importance to criminal cases of a more serious category, and excessive preoccupation of persons who are not interested in the criminal case has been prevented. On the other hand, the institution of reconciliation can be seen as an alternative measure to criminal punishment. At present, not only in Uzbekistan, but also in many countries of the world, it can be seen that the tendency to liberalize criminal-legal measures, limiting criminal punishment relatively, is increasing. Nowadays, improving the institution of reconciliation, studying the possibilities of its wider application remains the demand of the time. Currently, the problems related to the institution of reconciliation are mainly the problems related to the uncertainties in the criminal legal framework and the problems related to the expansion of the application of the institution of reconciliation. In particular, it is possible to include the extent to which the perpetrator confessed to the crime, the consent of the civil plaintiff as well as the victim to reconciliation, the extent to which damages are compensated, including cases where the victim refused to compensate for damages, and the fact that reconciliation has become a means of avoiding responsibility by some persons. Based on the scientific study, it is necessary to study the possibilities of applying reconciliation for less serious crimes, as well as for some serious crimes, taking into account the identity of the culprit.
References
“2017-2021 йилларда Ўзбекистон Республикасини ривожлантиришнинг бешта устувор йўналиши бўйича Ҳаракатлар стратегиясини “Фаол инвестициялар ва ижтимоий ривожланиш йили”да амалга оширишга оид давлат дастури тўғрисида”ги Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг 2019 йил 17 январдаги ПФ- 5635-сонли Фармони. (Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated January 17, 2019 No. PF-5635 "On the state program for the implementation of the Strategy of Actions on the five priority directions of the development of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2017-2021 in the "Year of Active Investments and Social Development").
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Суд Пленумининг 2002 йил 25 октябрдаги “Ярашув тўғрисидаги ишлар бўйича суд амалиёти ҳақида”ги 27 сонли Қарори. (Resolution No. 27 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated October 25, 2002 "On the judicial practice of conciliation cases").
Ярашувчилик институтини такомиллаштириш: назария ва амалиёт: Давра суҳбати материаллари. - Т.: Тошкент давлат юридик институти, 2005. - Б. 194. (Improving the institution of reconciliation: theory and practice: Proceedings of a roundtable discussion. - T.: Tashkent State Legal Institute, 2005. - P. 194).
Ҳамидуллаев А. А. Ярашув институти: жазолаш судловидан ҳуқуқни тиклаш одил судловига ўтиш механизми. - Т., 2003. - Б. 198. (Hamidullaev A. A. The Institution of Reconciliation: A Mechanism for Transitioning from Punitive Justice to Restorative Justice. - T., 2003. - P. 198).
Останина В.В. Освобождение от уголовной ответственности в связи с примирением с потерпевшим: Учебное пособие / Кемеровский госуниверситет. - Кемерово: Кузбассвузиздат, 2004. - С. 131. (Ostanina V.V. Exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation with the victim: Textbook / Kemerovo State University. - Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2004. - P. 131).
Пайзиев Д.Ю. Ярашганлиги муносабати билан жиноий жавобгарликдан озод қилиш институтини кенгайтириш масалалари. Ўзбекистон Республикаси ИИВ Ахборотномаси. 2017, №3, 19-22 бет. (Payziev D. Yu. Issues of expansion of the institution of release from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation. Bulletin of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2017, No. 3, pp. 19-22).
Садиков С. Ярашилганлиги муносабати билан жиноий жавобгарликдан озод қилиш билан боғлиқ нормаларни такомиллаштириш имкониятлари.“Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят кодексини такомиллаштириш масалалари” Республика илмий- амалий конференция материаллари тўплами (10 март 2017 йил). - Т.: ТДЮУ нашриёти, 2017. - 167-169 б. (Sadikov S. Possibilities of improving norms related to exemption from criminal responsibility in connection with reconciliation. "Issues of improving the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan" collection of materials of the republican scientific and practical conference (March 10, 2017). - T.: TSUL Publishing House, 2017. - p. 167-169).
Уголовное право зарубежнмх стран: учебное пособие. Л.С.Аистова, Д.Ю.Краев. - С.Петербург : С.Петербургский юридический институт (филиал) Академии Генеральной прокуратурь: РФ, 2013. - С. 132. (Criminal law of foreign countries: textbook. L.S.Aistova, D.Yu.Kraev. - St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office: RF, 2013. - P. 132).
Суд-ҳуқуқ ислоҳоти: назарий ва амалиёт мавзусида халқаро илмий- амалий конференция материаллари. -Т., 2001. (Judiciary reform: materials of the international scientific and practical conference on theoretical and practical topics. -T., 2001).
Otajonov A. A. Legal analysis of signs participation in the crime // Pravo va jizn. – 2019. – №. 1. – С. 60-65.
Toshev O. Experience of using the institution of plea bargain agreement in the legislation of the USA //Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 10. – №. 12. – С. 1168-1179.
