LEGAL EXPERIMENT AND REGULATORY SANDBOX: ANALYSIS OF MUTUAL RELATION AND DISCREPANCIES
Keywords:
Experiment, legal experiment, legal rulemaking, legislative acts, the bill, regulatory impact assessment, regulatory sandbox, mechanism, smart regulationAbstract
This article discusses the legal concept experiment based on domestic and foreign experience, the expediency of its use as a normative metho creativity. Accord to the opinions presented, and the specific features of the application of the legal experiment, conclusions and proposals were put forward on its application. In addition, the legal experiment and the mutual similarities and differences of the regulatory sandbox were analyzed.
References
Parenti R. Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs for FinTech //Study for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg. – 2020. pp. 65.
https://www.eg-online.ru/article/392177
https://www.eg-online.ru/article/392177
Рабочая группа БРИКС по исследованию вопросов конкуренции в условиях цифровой экономики. [Электрон¬ный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://brics-icc-2019.org/en/digital-markets (дата обращения: 05.12.2019) (BRICS Working Group on Competition in the Digital Economy. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://brics-icc-2019.org/en/digital-markets (date of access: 12/05/2019))
https://mgimopravo.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/162
Лазарев В.В. К вопросу о понятии и пределах эксперимента в области государства и права / Лазарев В.В. Избранные труды. Т. 2. М.: Новая юстиция, 2010. С. 5–15. (Lazarev V.V. To the question of the concept and limits of the experiment in the field of state and law / Lazarev V.V. Selected works. T. 2. M.: New Justice, 2010. P. 5–15)
Ельцов В.Н. Правовой эксперимент в современной России: Проблемы эффективности: дис… канд. юрид. наук. Тамбов, 2009. 163 с. (Eltsov V.N. Legal Experiment in Modern Russia: Problems of Efficiency: Ph.D. legal Sciences. Tambov, 2009. 163 p)
Сафаров Р. А. Социальный эксперимент и проблемы государства и права // Советское государство и право. 1964. № 10. С. 14–22. (Safarov R. A. Social experiment and problems of state and law // Soviet state and law. 1964. No. 10. P. 14–22)
Faure B. Les relations paradoxales de l’expérimentation et du principed’égalité (à propos de la décision n° 2004-503 DC du 12 août 2004, loi relative aux libertés et responsabilités locales) // Revue française de droit administrative. 2004. № 6. P. 1150. (Faure B. The paradoxical relations of experimentation and the principle of equality (about decision no. 2004-503 DC of August 12, 2004, law relating to local freedoms and responsibilities) // Revue française de droit administrative. 2004. No. 6. P. 1150)
Колдаева Н. П. Социальноправовой эксперимент (некоторые теоретические аспекты) // Право и правотворчество: вопросы теории. М.: ИГиПАН СССР, 1982. С. 69–76. (Koldaeva N. P. Socio-legal experiment (some theoretical aspects) // Law and law-making: questions of theory. Moscow: IGiPAN SSSR, 1982, pp. 69–76.)
Никитинский В. И. Значение эксперимента в нормотворческой деятельности // Советское государство и право. 1967. № 6. С. 26–34. (Nikitinsky V. I. The value of the experiment in rule-making activity // Soviet state and law. 1967. No. 6. P. 26–34)
Лазарев В. В. К вопросу о понятии и пределах эксперимента в области государства и права // Правоведение. 1966. № 1. С. 17–23. (Lazarev VV To the question of the concept and limits of the experiment in the field of state and law // Jurisprudence. 1966. No. 1. P. 17
