DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY: A NEW STAGE OF REFORM OF JUDUCIAL SYSTEM
Keywords:
judiciary, corps of judges, digitization, adversarial principle, transparency principle, single window principleAbstract
This article consistently analyzes the essence of the gradual democratization and liberalization of the judicial system in our country, aimed at implementing democratic reforms, strengthening the rule of law and legitimacy, reliable protection of individual rights and interests. The author analyzes the reforms based on the Action Strategy for 2017-2021 and scientifically substantiates the need to continue these reforms. Also highlighted on the compliance of judicial and legal reforms under the motto "For the dignity of human" with international standards. Scientific and theoretical views on the main factors ensuring the independence of the judiciary are covered.
References
Мамасиддиқов М.М. Суд ҳокимияти мустақиллигининг конституциявий асослари (Constitutional foundations of the independence of the judiciary) // URL: http://constitution.uz/uz/pages/Sud_hokimiyati_mustaqilligi.
P.Barenboim, N.Merkulova "The 25th Anniversary of Constitutional Economics: The Russian Model and Legal Reform in Russia, in The World Rule of Law Movement and Russian Legal Reform (http://philosophical club.ru/content/docs/worldruleoflaw.pdf)", edited by Francis Neate and Holly Nielsen, Justitsinform, Moscow (2007).
П.Филиппов Судебная реформа и ее движение / (Judicial reform in its movement / Bulletin. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 5, Jurisprudence. 2015. № 4 (29) - P. 123).
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг 2022 — 2026 йилларга мўлжалланган Янги Ўзбекистоннинг тараққиёт стратегияси тўғрисида”ги Фармони. (Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026" National Database of Legislation, 29.01.2022, No. 06/22/60/0082)
Голдер Бирлашган Қиролликка қарши, № 4451/70 шикоят, 1975 йил 21 февралдаги қарор, 36-банд. (Golder v. United Kingdom, № 4451/70 Complaint, Decision of 21 February 1975, Clause 36)
Б.А.Мўминов. Жиноят ишларини судга қадар юритиш устидан суд назорати. (Judicial review over pre-trial criminal proceedings in criminal cases. Abstract of doctoral (Doctor of Science) dissertation on legal sciences. Т.2020. p.22.)
Инсон ҳуқуқлари бўйича қўмита, № 32 умумий тартибдаги мулоҳаза, 14-модда: Судлар ва трибуналлар олдида тенглик ва ҳар кимнинг адолатли суд муҳокамасига ҳуқуқи, 13-банд. (Committee on Human Rights, № 32 General Consideration, Article 14: Equality before Courts and Tribunals and the Right of Everyone to a Fair Trial, Article 13)
Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации // http://www.consultant.ru; Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Республики Азербайджан // http://cld.privatelaw.ru (Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation // http://www.consultant.ru; Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan // http://cld.privatelaw.ru)
Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Федеративной Республики Германии. (Code of Civil Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany). http://context.reverso.net
Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 04.09.2020 й., 07/20/4818/1255-сон (National Database of Legislation, 04.09.2020, No. 07/20/4818/1255)
Irving R. Kaufman The Essence of Judicial Independence // Columbia Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 4 (May, 1980), pp. 671-701. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1122136. Sanford Levinson, Identifying "Independence," 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1297 (2006) (identifying formal and informal pressure on the judiciary);
Ж.Абдурахмонхўжаев. Судьялар корпусини шакллантиришнинг ўзига хос хусусиятлари: Ўзбекистон ва хорижий мамлакатлар тажрибаси. Yuridikfanlaraxborotnomasi-2 (2018) 159-164. (Peculiarities of the formation of the judiciary: the experience of Uzbekistan and foreign countries. Juridical Sciences Information-2 (2018) 159-164.)
Daniel M. Klerman & Paul G. Mahoney, The Value of Judicial Independence: Evidence from Eighteenth Century England, 7 AM. L. & ECON. REV. 1, 2-3 (2005).
