EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MASS DISORDERS PREVENTION
Keywords:
mass disorders, prevention, public security, police activity, foreign experience, cooperation with the public, information analysis, human rights, comparative analysis, law enforcement system, preventive activityAbstract
This article analyzes the legal, organizational, and criminological experience of foreign countries in the field of preventing (profiling) mass disorders. The author has studied the public security systems of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the member states of the European Union, and conducted a comparative analysis of their most effective elements. The study also examines advanced principles of police activity in preventive processes, such as ensuring human rights, establishing reliable communication with the public, effective use of information technologies, and minimizing the use of force. The article highlights the institutional foundations of prevention, cooperation with the public, information analysis, and the importance of early warning systems as general regularities of foreign experience. At the same time, the author scientifically evaluates the possibilities of adapting foreign models to the conditions of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The results of the research have methodological and practical significance for law enforcement agencies, criminologists, legal scholars, and practitioners.
References
Public Order Management Guidelines. U.S. Department of Justice, 2020.
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (UK). Public Order Act 1986 (UK).
Ministère de l’Intérieur de France. Maintien de l’ordre public. Paris, 2021.
Bundesministerium des Innern. Leitfaden zur öffentlichen Sicherheit, Berlin, 2020.
CEPOL Training Manual on Crowd Management, European Union, 2022.
Соловьев А.А. Спортивный кодекс Франции: история и предпосылки принятия, структура и особенности. (Solovyov A.A. The French Sports Code: History and Prerequisites for Its Adoption, Structure and Features). lawlibrary.ru/article2136532.html.
Akram S. Recognizing the 2011 United Kingdom Riots as Political Protest: A Theoretical Framework Based on Agency, Habitus and the Preconscious // British Journal of Criminology. 2014. № 54 (3): R. 375 – 392.
Ишмухаметов Я.М., Янмурзин Д.Р. Условия развития массовых беспорядков // Право и государство: теория и практика. — 2023. — № 5 (221). — С. 304–305. (Ishmukhametov Ya.M., Yanmurzin D.R. Conditions for the Development of Mass Riots // Law and State: Theory and Practice., 2023, No. 5 (221), pp. 304–305).
Курлянский В.С., Карпушин М.П. Уголовная ответственность и состав преступления. — Москва: Юридическая литература, 1974. — 232 с (Kurlyansky V.S., Karpushin M.P. Criminal Liability and the Elements of a Crime. — Moscow: Yurydicheskaya Literatura, 1974. — 232 p.).
Степанов М.В., Петрянин А.В. Социально-правовая обусловленность криминализации противоправной деятельности, сопряженной с использованием цифровых финансовых активов // Вестник Казанского юридического института МВД России. — 2020. — Т. 11, № 2. — С. 203–212 (Stepanov M.V., Petryanin A.V. The Socio-Legal Determinants of the Criminalization of Unlawful Activities Involving the Use of Digital Financial Assets // Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. — 2020. — Vol. 11, No. 2. — Pp. 203–212).
