FEATURES OF LIABILITY FOR ECONOMIC DAMAGE CAUSED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT
Keywords:
artificial intellect, economic sphere, intellectual risk, threat, bank, tortAbstract
In this scientific article, the author examines the issue of economic damage caused by artificial intelligence in the commission of cybercrimes in the process of financial and banking activities, which are gaining an increasingly significant place in the economic sphere of the Republic of Uzbekistan, including a detailed examination of existing opinions, ideas, concepts and scientific discussions in legal science on the issue of its liability. Based on these scientific opinions, views and discussions, the author comes to the conclusion that at present, the national legislation does not provide for measures of direct legal (civil or criminal) liability for economic damage caused by the commission of cybercrimes using artificial intelligence, at the same time, in science and practice, special laws of developed foreign countries, legal provisions have been formed regarding the economic liability of artificial intelligence, therefore, when determining liability for economic damage caused by an act or use of artificial intelligence, it is necessary to take into account a number of conditions that have already developed in world practice. For this purpose, the author puts forward scientifically based proposals and recommendations for making appropriate additions and changes to the national civil, criminal and other legislative acts.
References
Tesla driver in fatal ‘Autopilot’ crash got numerous warnings: U.S. government // Reuters. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article /us-tesla-crash-idUSKBN19A2XC;
Robot Kills worker at Volkswagen plant in Germany // The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world /2015/jul/02/robot-kills-worker-at-volkswagenplant-in-germany;
SAURABH JHA MARCH 9, 2020 URL: https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/09/can-you-sue-artificial-intelligence-algorithm-for-malpractice/;
Eduardo MAGRANI, “New perspectives on ethics and the laws of artificial intelligence” in Internet Policy Review, Volume 8, Issue 9, 2019, available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/newperspectivesethicsandlawsartificialIntelligence;
Попова, Н.Ф. Основные направления развития правового регулирования использования искусственного интеллекта, роботов и объектов робототехники в сфере гражданских правоотношений / Н.Ф. Попова // Современное право. - 2019. - N 10. (Popova, N.F. Main directions of development of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects in the sphere of civil legal relations / N.F. Popova // Modern law. - 2019. - N 10);
Ролинсон, П. Объекты интеллектуальной собственности, создаваемые с помощью искусственного интеллекта: особенности правового режима в России и за рубежом / П. Ролинсон, Е.А. Ариевич, Д.Е. Ермолина // Закон. - 2018. - N 5. (Rawlinson, P. Intellectual property objects created with the help of artificial intelligence: features of the legal regime in Russia and abroad / P. Rawlinson, E.A. Arievich, D.E. Ermolova // Law. - 2018. - N 5);
Харитонова, Ю.С. Правовой режим результатов деятельности искусственного интеллекта / Ю.С. Харитонова // Современные информационные технологии и право: монография / отв. ред. Е.Б. Лаутс. - М.: Статут, 2019. (Kharitonova, Yu.S. Legal regime of the results of artificial intelligence activities / Yu.S. Kharitonova // Modern information technologies and law: monograph / rep. ed. E.B. Lauts. - M.: Statute, 2019);
Архипов В.В. Искусственный интеллект и автономные устройства в контексте права: о разработке первого в России закона о робототехнике / В.В. Архипов, В.Б. Наумов // Труды СПИИРАН. - 2017. - Вып. 55. (Arkhipov V.V. Artificial intelligence and autonomous devices in the context of law: on the development of the first law on robotics in Russia / V.V. Arkhipov, V.B. Naumov // Proceedings of SPIIRAS. - 2017. - Issue. 55);
Понкин, И.В. Искусственный интеллект с точки зрения права / И.В. Понкин, А.И. Редь-кина // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер.: Юридические науки. - 2018. - N 1. - Т. 22. (Ponkin, I.V. Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law / I.V. Ponkin, A.I. Redkina // Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Legal sciences. - 2018. - N 1. - T. 22);
Рыженков, А.Я. Действие своей волей и в своем интересе как принцип гражданского законодательства / А.Я. Рыженков // Юрист. - 2014. - N 16. (Ryzhenkov, A.Ya. Action of one's own will and in one's own interests as a principle of civil legislation / A.Ya. Ryzhenkov // Jurist. - 2014. - N 16);
Братусь С.Н. Субъекты гражданского права / С.Н. Братусь. - М.: Гос. издат. юрид. лит., 1950. (Bratus S.N. Subjects of civil law / S.N. Bratus. - M.: State Publishing House of Legal Literature, 1950);
Buyers J. Liability Issues in Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous systems [Вопросы ответственности применительно к автономным и полуавтономным системам] / Osborne Clarke LLP //. –2015. – P. 1. (Buyers J. Liability Issues in Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Systems / Osborne Clarke LLP //. –2015. – P. 1);
Common law jurisdictions often refer to negligence as the default tort liability rule, whereas civil law jurisdictions are based on the Roman concept of delict;
Design defects are clearly covered by product liability law in some jurisdictions, such as the United States: see RACHUM-TWAIG (n 7), p;
Martin UEFFING, “Directive 85/374 – European Victory or a Defective Product Itself?” in MaRLBe Research Papers, 2013, vol. 4, p. 373-424, at p. 392;
Margaret HORN and Kelly DAWSON, “Product Liability – United States” in Getting the Deal Through, July 2019, sections 18-19, available at: https://gettingthedealthrough.com/area/30/jurisdiction/23/product-liabilityunited-states;
HORN et als. (n 17), section 29; in the European Union: EU Product Liability Directive (n 15), article 7(d);
EU Product Liability Directive (n 15), article 7(b);
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Liability for emerging digital technologies, Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, April 25, 2018, SWD/2018/137 final, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018SC0137;
Woodrow BARFIELD, “Liability for Autonomous and Artificially Intelligent Robots” in Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2018, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 193-203;
ČERKA et als. (2015) (n 6), p. 383;
RACHUM-TWAIG (n 7), p. 13, citing various references in common law; BARFIELD (n 30), p. 199; DAHIYAT (2010) (n 20), p. 7, 113;
Mark. A. CHINEN, “The co-evolution of autonomous machines and legal responsibility” in Virginia Journal of Law & Technology, Fall 2016, Vol. 20, no. 02, p. 338-393; BARFIELD (n 30), p. 195;
JUNOD (n 35), p. 124; Chris TEMPLE, “AI-Driven Decision-Making May Expose Organizations to Significant Liability Risk”, Corporate Compliance Insights, September 11, 2019, available at: https://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/ai-liability-risk/; see also DAHIYAT (2018) (n 9), p. 38.
