SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Authors

  • JABBAROV Sherzod Rakhimberdiyevich
  • KHURSANOV Yoqubjon Erkin ugli

Keywords:

неспецифический язвенный колит, хирургия, лапароскопия

Abstract

This article provides an extensive analysis of the evolution of minimally invasive colorectal surgery and modern approaches to the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC). Beginning with the first laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy performed by Jacobs et al. in 1990, the authors highlight the substantial progress in video-endoscopic technologies while emphasizing persistent limitations, including the lack of tactile feedback, loss of three-dimensional perception, and technical challenges in obese patients, those with prior abdominal surgery, or those with locally advanced disease. The introduction of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has expanded the applicability of minimally invasive techniques by improving intraoperative control, reducing conversion rates, and shortening operative time.The paper reviews the current landscape of UC surgery, noting that despite advances in medical therapy, up to 50% of patients require surgical intervention. The major factors contributing to poor outcomes include delayed surgery, absence of unified criteria for medical treatment resistance, high systemic toxicity, and severe metabolic disturbances. Persistent difficulties involve the absence of a universally accepted “gold standard” for restorative surgery in UC, the high rate of functional complications after IPAA, and ongoing debate regarding optimal reconstructive strategies.Modern trends in minimally invasive surgery including total laparoscopic IPAA, transanal approaches (ta-IPAA), and robotic techniques are examined. Literature data demonstrate benefits such as improved quality of life, reduced adhesion formation, better fertility outcomes, and fewer postoperative complications. The review concludes that optimization of UC treatment requires refined patient selection, improved perioperative management, and integration of innovative technologies while maintaining strict surgical and oncological principles.

References

Peters WR. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with creation of ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992;2:175-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Agha A, Moser C, Iesalnieks I, et al. Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): Technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1547-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Remzi F, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a useful tool for surgeons early in the learning curve performing total abdominal colectomy. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:199-205. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Boushey RP, Marcello PW, Martel G, et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy: an evolutionary experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1512-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Bemelman WA, Ringers J, Meijer DW, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with the dexterity pneumo sleeve. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:S59-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Shimada N, Ohge H, Yano R, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016;8:578-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Bordeianou L, Hodin R. Total proctocolectomy with ileoanal J-pouch reconstruction utilizing the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:2314-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Holubar SD, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, et al. Minimally invasive subtotal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for fulminant ulcerative colitis: a reasonable approach? Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:187-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Fowkes L, Krishna K, Menon A, et al. Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:373-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, et al. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:604-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhu P, Xing C. Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Minim Access Surg 2017;13:256-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004;240:984-91; discussion 991-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1301-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Lavryk OA, Stocchi L, Ashburn JH, et al. Case-Matched Comparison of Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. World J Surg 2018;42:3746-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Sampietro GM, Colombo F, Frontali A, et al. Totally laparoscopic, multi-stage, restorative proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel diseases. A prospective study on safety, efficacy and long-term results. Dig Liver Dis 2018;50:1283-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Ouaïssi M, Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, et al. Laparoscopic 3-step restorative proctocolectomy: comparative study with open approach in 45 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:357-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Baek SJ, Dozois EJ, Mathis KL, et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in 588 patients undergoing minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single-institution experience. Tech Coloproctol 2016;20:369-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Ouaïssi M, et al. Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients. Surg Endosc 2009;23:166-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Ozawa H, Nakamura T, Ikeda A, et al. Benefits of a straight laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective case-matched study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:118-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Hull TL, Joyce MR, Geisler DP, et al. Adhesions after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 2012;99:270-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:818-26; discussion 826-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Benlice C, Costedio M, Kessler H, et al. Comparison of straight vs hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: an assessment from the NSQIP procedure-targeted cohort. Am J Surg 2016;212:406-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Kjaer MD, Laursen SB, Qvist N, et al. Sexual function and body image are similar after laparoscopy-assisted and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 2014;38:2460-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, et al. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg 2013;258:275-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Bartels SA, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA, et al. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2012;256:1045-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Geisler DP, Kirat HT, Remzi FH. Single-port laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: initial operative experience. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2175-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Remzi FH, Aytac E, Ashburn J, et al. Transabdominal Redo Ileal Pouch Surgery for Failed Restorative Proctocolectomy: Lessons Learned Over 500 Patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:675-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Braunschmid T, Hartig N, Baumann L, et al. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate. Surg Endosc 2017;31:5318-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]

de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, D'Hoore A. Transanal completion proctectomy after total colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a modified single stapled technique. Colorectal Dis 2016;18:O141-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Zaghiyan K, Warusavitarne J, Spinelli A, et al. Technical variations and feasibility of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified across continents. Tech Coloproctol 2018;22:867-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]

de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA, et al. Transanal Versus Transabdominal Minimally Invasive (Completion) Proctectomy With Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparative Study. Ann Surg 2017;266:878-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Marker L, Kjær S, Levic-Souzani K, et al. Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a single-center comparative study. Tech Coloproctol 2022;26:875-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Capolupo GT, Carannante F, Mascianà G, et al. Transanal proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TaIPAA) for ulcerative colitis: medium term functional outcomes in a single centre. BMC Surg 2021;21:17. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Bislenghi G, Denolf M, Fieuws S, et al. Functional outcomes of transanal versus transabdominal restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis-a monocentric retrospective comparative study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022;407:3607-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Truong A, Wood T, Fleshner PR, et al. A Single-Center Experience of Transanal Proctectomy With IPAA for IBD. Dis Colon Rectum 2022;65:1121-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Park L, Truong A, Zaghiyan K, et al. A Single-Center Comparative Study of Open Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Transanal Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis with Total Mesorectal Excision. Has the Bar Been Raised? J Gastrointest Surg 2022;26:1070-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;318:1569-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021;36:1621-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Flynn J, Larach JT, Kong JCH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021;36:1345-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Marks JH, Salem JF, Adams P, et al. SP rTaTME: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (SP rTaTME). Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:721-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16