LINGVOPRAGMATIC AND LINGVOCULTURAL STUDY OF THE SEMANTIC FIELD “HAND” IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Keywords:
concept, tool, metaphorical expressions, coordinate, lexicon, anthroponomic, linguisticAbstract
The article studies the semantic peculiarities of lexeme “hand” in English, their roles in the speech act as well as it’s stylistic features. Human body undoubtedly has been the most important cognitive status in human being’s cognition. One of the most important theoretical and practical results of recent lexicological research is the structural principle of the organization of this dictionary. The principle of systematic organization is observed in the relationship between the components of lexical-semantic association. It contains a special word, the semantic structure of which fully reflects the common semantic features of all members of this grouping. The remaining words included in this lexical-semantic system occupy a subordinate position in the hierarchical stage of the components. The principle of structure is also important in the organization of a dictionary. This paper will, to a certain degree, be helpful to the vocabulary and rhetoric teaching in English.
References
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.
Harper Collins Publishers Ltd. (2017). Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese Dictionary. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Hornby, A. S. (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese Dictionary (8th Edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
Кацнельсон С.Д. Категории языка и мышления: из научного наследия/С.Д. Кацнельсон. М.:Яз.славянскойкультуры, 2001. 471-бет
Арутюнова Н.Д. язык и мир человека. Н.Д. Арутюнова. 2-ое изд., М.:Яз. Рус. Культуры, 1999.(Язык. Семиотика. Культура)
The Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Tenth Edition, revised. Oxford Univ. Press, 2002. XX. 1708 p.
Хельбиг Г. Языкознание сопоставление - преподавание иностранных языков // H3JI. Вып. 25: Контрастивная лингвистика. М., 1989. С. 307-326.
Холодович A.A. Опыт теории подклассов слов. JL: Наука, 1979, с.238-243.
Хромых Г.С. Переносные значения в лексических микросистемах (закономерности развития и организации). Дис. . канд.филол.наук. - Воронеж, 1979. - 177с.
Чейф У.Л. Значение и структура языка. М.: Прогресс, 1975. -530с.
Чикобава A.C. Сопоставительное изучение языков как метод исследования и метод обучения. Русский язык в национальной школе, 1957, №6, с. 1-4.
Шапилова H.H. Глаголы чувства в современном русском языке: Автореф. Дис. канд.филол.наук. Кемерово, 1967. - 20с. - В надзаг.: Куйбышевский гос.пед.ин-т им. В.В.Куйбышева.
Shcherba L.V. Experience of the general theory of lexicography // In the book: Shcherba L.V. Language system and speech activity. -L.: Science, 1974. p. 265.
Shchur G.S. Field theory in linguistics. Moscow: Nauka, 1974. P.253
Yusupov U.K. Problems of Comparative Linguistics. M., 1983.
Jacobson R. Linguistics and poetics. In the book: Structuralism: "for" and "against". M .: Progress, 1975. P. 193-230.
