AYOLLARDA TOS A'ZOLARINING PROLAPSASI UCHUN JARROHLIK YONDASHUVLARI: RESPUBLIKA GINEKOLOGLARINING KLINIK AMALIYOTI
##article.subject##:
Respublika ginekologlari, tos a'zolarining prolapsasi, jarrohlik aralashuvlar tahlili##article.abstract##
Tos a'zolarining prolapsasini jarrohlik yo'li bilan davolash (PTO) tos a'zolarining anatomiyasini tiklash va bemorlarning hayot sifatiga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatadigan simptomlarni bartaraf etishga qaratilgan funktsional yondashuv sifatida qaraladi. So'nggi o'n yilliklarda prolaps jarrohligi jarrohlik amaliyotidagi yutuqlar va klinik imtiyozlarning o'zgarishi tufayli sezilarli o'zgarishlarga duch keldi. Dalillarga asoslangan tibbiyotning rivojlanishi bilan ko'plab an'anaviy yondashuvlar qayta ko'rib chiqildi va zamonaviy tadqiqotlar turli xil operatsion strategiyalarning samaradorligini tasdiqlash yoki shubha ostiga qo'yishda davom etmoqda. Mavjud usullarning nisbiy afzalliklari va cheklovlarini tushunish klinik tanlov va davolash natijalarini optimallashtirishda muhim omil hisoblanadi. Ushbu maqolada besh yil davomida respublikaning hududiy bo'linmalarida ginekologlar tomonidan amalga oshirilgan prolapsojarrohlik aralashuvlarining retrospektiv tahlili keltirilgan. Amaldagi jarrohlik usullari, klinik tavsiyalarga muvofiqligi baholandi va zamonaviy — yondashuvlarini qo'llashda, ayniqsa bachadonni saqlash va apikal yordamni ta'minlashda kamchiliklar aniqlandi. Topilmalar PTO jarrohligining hozirgi tendentsiyalari haqida tushuncha beradi va zamonaviy uroginekologik amaliyotlarni mintaqaviy klinik muassasalarga kengroq joriy etish zarurligini ta'kidlaydi.
Библиографические ссылки
Ballard K, Ayenachew F, Wright J, Atnafu H. Prevalence of obstetric fistula and symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in rural Ethiopia. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(7):1063–7.
Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. Published 2015 Jul 23. doi:10.1136/bmj.h3717.
Enklaar, Rosa A et al. “Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA vol. 330,7 (2023): 626-635. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.13140
Maher C, Yeung E, Haya N, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012376. Published 2023 Jul 26. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2
Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129-146.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018
Menefee, Shawn A et al. “Apical Suspension Repair for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA surgery, e241206. 22 May. 2024, doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1206
Robinson MO, Linder BJ. Evaluation and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Med. 2023 Aug;114(4):516-528. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.22.08396-3. Epub 2023 Feb 14. PMID: 36786749.
Sadeh R, Schmidt M, Hod Y, Zilberlicht A, Feferkorn I, Haya N, Abramov Y. A comparative study of Colpocleisis vs. Vaginal Hysterectomy for the treat- ment of Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Isr Med Association Journal: IMAJ. 2022;25(12):842–6.
Tolstrup, Cæcilie Krogsgaard et al. “The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.” International urogynecology journal vol. 28,1 (2017): 33-40. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3100-y
Wu J. M., Matthews C. A., Conover M. M. et al. Lifetime risk of stress urinar incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2024;123(6):1201–6
