INNOVATIVE EDUCATIONAL PARADIGM IN MODERN SOCIETY
Keywords:
education, science, man, knowledge, innovationAbstract
The connection between science and education is a fundamental condition for the innovative development of society. Innovative processes require deep, meaningful understanding from the point of view of worldview and methodological approaches. Humanity has reached a sufficiently high level of intellectual development, but still does not have a common understanding of the tasks and goals of education. A huge methodological experience has been accumulated, but the problems remain, even multiply in connection with the problems of the modern world. Especially this year, due to the forced transition to distance education associated with the worldwide spread of coronavirus infection, the education sector has experienced a colossal crisis.
The transformation of the sphere of education should consist in the formation of a person as a whole, identification of the inner world of a person, an integrated personality. The purpose of education is to develop creative activity, where the learning individual could feel himself as an active subject.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the innovative type of thinking and behavior of an individual in the context of the scientific, technical and information revolution. It is concluded that, as a result of modern scientific and technological development in the economy, the decisive role is played not by material factors, but by knowledge, information, and an innovative type of thinking. Today, we can state with confidence that the role of the knowledge economy, the importance of sound knowledge management has increased. The role of humanitarian knowledge should also be noted. Innovative activity is possible with institutions that ensure the materialization of knowledge in new technologies, where a socio-economic and socio-cultural environment is created. In the Republic of Kazakhstan, the priority areas of clustering of the educational process are highlighted based on the characteristics of the country's economic and regional development.
References
Bard A., Sonderkvist J. Netocracy. (2005). The new power elite and life after capitalism. St. Petersburg, ; (in rus)
Bauman Z. (2008).Liquid Modernity. St. Petersburg, 2008. (in rus)
Boltanski L., Chiapello E.(2011). The new spirit of capitalism. Мockow., (in rus)
Castells M.(1999). The rise of the network society // New post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. Мoscow, (in rus)
Drucker P.(2007). Management in a non-profit organization: principles and practice. (in rus) Мoscow: Thought.
Drucker P.(1999). Post-Capitalist Society// New post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. Мoscow. (in rus)
Frank D.J., Mayer J. (2010). The expansion of universities and the knowledge society // The concept of "knowledge society" in modern theory. Мoscow: INION, (in rus).
Gershunsky B.S. (1997). Education in the third millennium: harmony of knowledge and faith. (in rus) Мoscow: Aist.
Husen T. (1990).Education and the Global Concem. – Oxford.
Hutchinson P. (2008). Shame and Philosophy: an Investigation in the philosophy of emotions and ethics. - NY.
Knorr Cetina K. (2006). Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. // Sociology of things. Digest of articles. Мoscow. (in rus).
Miklyaev, V.A. (2010). Theoretical correlation of the concepts of "information society" and "knowledge society"// Dialogue of cultures: science in the knowledge society. Collection of scientific papers of the international scientific and practical conference. St. Petersburg. (in rus).
Naisbitt J. (2003). Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. Мoscow. (in rus).
Nalivaiko N.V., Petrov V.V. (2011). Innovative education in Russia: introduction or study of foreign experience? // Philosophy of Education. - Novosibirsk, N. 2. S.11-24. (in rus)
Nazarbayev N.A. (2014).Message to the people of Kazakhstan “Kazakhstan’s path - 2050: common goal, common interests, common future // Kazakhstanskaya Pravda. Astana, January 18, (in rus)
Polre B.(2008). Cognitive capitalism on the march // Political journal. № 2. (in rus)
Riakova Y., Savchuk Y., Sagikyzy A. (2019). Historical and philosophical prerequisites of analysis of the modern global processes. Bulletin of KazNU. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science. No2 (68). P.82-89.
Senge P.(2008). Transformation. Human potential and future horizons. - Мoscow: Mir. (in rus)
Sovzikhanova E.E. (2013).Globalization in Education // Creative Economy. (in rus) Мoscow, No. 10. S.58-69.
Tsukovich H.(2008). The Triple Helix: University - Industry - Government Innovation in Action // Routledge. - NY, No. 3. P. 70-98.
Turyszhanova R. (2014).The problem of man in philosophy of education. Almaty, (in rus)
Yespaev S.S.(2013). Cluster strategies are the basis of innovation and competitiveness: problems and tasks // News NAS RK. Social Science Series. Almaty, No. 4. S.40-47. (in rus)
Zhunusov T.T.(2012). Kazakhstan science: formation of a single triad // Bulletin of the Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. –Almaty, No. 4. S.40-48. (in rus)
