KRANIOSEREBRAL TRAVMALAR OQIBATLARI NEYROREABILITATSIYASIDA «BOSH MIYA-KOMPYUTER» INTERFEYSLARINING AHAMIYATI (ADABIYOTLAR TAHLILI)

##article.authors##

  • Aliyev Mansur Abduxoliqovich
  • Mamadaliyev Abdurahmon Mamatqulovich
  • Yarmuhammedova Nargiza Anvarovna

##article.subject##:

bosh miya–kompyuter interfeysi; neyroreabilitatsiya; neyrotexnologiyalar; kranioserebral travmalar oqibatlari

##article.abstract##

So‘nggi yillarda “Bosh Bosh miya-kompyuter interfeysi” texnologiyalari sohasidagi yutuqlar nevrologik funksiyalarni tiklash va reabilitatsiya qilishda yangi davrni boshlab berdi. Ushbu texnologiyalar nogironlik keltirib chiqaruvchi nevrologik kasalliklarga chalingan insonlarga, xususan kranioserebral travmalarning oqibatlarida atrof-muhit bilan o‘zaro muloqot qilish, kundalik hayotdagi muhim vazifalarni bajarish hamda shaxsiy maqsadlariga erishish imkoniyatini berishga yo‘naltirilgan.

Mazkur maqolada “Bosh miya-kompyuter interfeysi” (BMKI) texnologiyalarining asosiy tamoyillari, afzalliklari, muammolari va kelajakdagi rivojlanish istiqbollari neyroreabilitatsiya nuqtai-nazaridan tahlil qilinadi. Shuningdek, ushbu texnologiyalarning klinik amaliyotdagi qo‘llanilishi ko‘rib chiqilib, nevrologik kasalliklarga chalingan bemorlarda, jumladan kranioserebral travmalar oqibatlarida BMKI tizimlarini joriy etish bo‘yicha yondashuvlar taklif etiladi.

Библиографические ссылки

Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10):1371–1383. [PubMed: 15672628].

Bockbrader MA, Francisco G, Lee R, Olson J, Solinsky R, Boninger ML. Brain Computer Interfaces in Rehabilitation Medicine. PM R. 2018;10(9S2):S233–S243. [PubMed: 30269808].

Lee MB, Kramer DR, Peng T, et al. Brain-Computer Interfaces in Quadriplegic Patients. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):275–281. [PubMed: 30898278].

Kogel J, Schmid JR, Jox RJ, Friedrich O. Using brain-computer interfaces: a scoping review of studies employing social research methods. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):18. [PubMed: 30845952].

Coenen A, Fine E, Zayachkivska O. Adolf Beck: a forgotten pioneer in electroencephalography. J Hist Neurosci. 2014;23(3):276–286. [PubMed: 24735457].

Zayachkivska O, Gzhegotsky M, Coenen A. Impact on electroencephalography of Adolf Beck, a prominent Polish scientist and founder of the Lviv School of Physiology. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012;85(1):3–6. [PubMed: 22101137].

Silvoni S, Ramos-Murguialday A, Cavinato M, et al. Brain-computer interface in stroke: a review of progress. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42(4):245–252. [PubMed: 22208122].

Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(2):164–173. [PubMed: 10896178].

Vaughan TM, Heetderks WJ, Trejo LJ, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the Second International Meeting. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11(2):94–109. [PubMed: 12899247].

Abiri R, Borhani S, Sellers EW, Jiang Y, Zhao X. A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain computer interface paradigms. J Neural Eng. 2019;16(1):011001. [PubMed: 30523919].

Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Roland J, Rouse A, Moran DW. Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(1):E4.

Remsik A, Young B, Vermilyea R, et al. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(5):445–454. [PubMed: 27112213].

Mudry A, Mills M. The early history of the cochlear implant: a retrospective. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(5):446–453. [PubMed: 23681026].

Lee B, Zubair MN, Marquez YD, et al. A Single-Center Experience with the NeuroPace RNS System: A Review of Techniques and Potential Problems. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(3):719–726. [PubMed: 25940211].

Chaudhary U, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(9):513–525. [PubMed: 27539560].

Cantillo-Negrete J, Carino-Escobar RI, Carrillo-Mora P, Elias-Vinas D, Gutierrez-Martinez J. Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface coupled to a robotic hand orthosis aimed for neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2018;2018.

Chowdhury A, Raza H, Meena YK, Dutta A, Prasad G. An EEG-EMG correlation-based brain computer interface for hand orthosis supported neuro-rehabilitation. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2019;312:1–11. [PubMed: 30452976].

Abiri R, Borhani S, Sellers EW, Jiang Y, Zhao X. A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain–computer interface paradigms. Journal of neural engineering. 2019;16(1):011001. [PubMed: 30523919].

Do AH, Wang PT, King CE, Chun SN, Nenadic Z. Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2013;10(1):111. [PubMed: 24321081].

Xu R, Jiang N, Mrachacz-Kersting N, et al. A closed-loop brain–computer interface triggering an active ankle–foot orthosis for inducing cortical neural plasticity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2014;61(7):2092–2101. [PubMed: 24686231].

King CE, Dave KR, Wang PT, et al. Performance assessment of a brain–computer interface driven hand orthosis. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2014;42(10):2095–2105. [PubMed: 25012465].

Ang KK, Guan C, Phua KS, et al. Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Frontiers in neuroengineering. 2014;7:30. [PubMed: 25120465].

Brumberg JS, Pitt KM, Mantie-Kozlowski A, Burnison JD. Brain–computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication: A tutorial. American journal of speech-language pathology. 2018;27(1):1–12. [PubMed: 29318256].

Brumberg JS, Pitt KM, Burnison JD. A noninvasive brain-computer interface for real-time speech synthesis: The importance of multimodal feedback. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2018;26(4):874–881. [PubMed: 29641392].

Guy V, Soriani M-H, Bruno M, Papadopoulo T, Desnuelle C, Clerc M. Brain computer interface with the P300 speller: usability for disabled people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2018;61(1):5–11. [PubMed: 29024794].

Rabbani Q, Milsap G, Crone NE. The potential for a speech brain–computer interface using chronic electrocorticography. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16(1):144–165. [PubMed: 30617653].

Kong F, Sahadat MN, Ghovanloo M, Durgin GD. A Stand-Alone Intraoral Tongue-Controlled Computer Interface for People With Tetraplegia. IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems. 2019;13(5):848–857. [PubMed: 31283486].

Rezeika A, Benda M, Stawicki P, Gembler F, Saboor A, Volosyak I. Brain–computer interface spellers: A review. Brain sciences. 2018;8(4):57.

Sellers EW, Donchin E. A P300-based brain–computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clinical neurophysiology. 2006;117(3):538–548. [PubMed: 16461003].

Pandarinath C, Nuyujukian P, Blabe CH, et al. High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain- computer interface. Elife. 2017;6:e18554. [PubMed: 28220753].

Chaudhary U, Xia B, Silvoni S, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N. Brain–computer interface–based communication in the completely locked-in state. PLoS biology. 2017;15(1):e1002593. [PubMed: 28141803].

Pichiorri F, Mattia D. Brain-computer interfaces in neurologic rehabilitation practice. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol 168. Elsevier; 2020:101–116. [PubMed: 32164846].

Huggins JE, Guger C, Ziat M, et al. Workshops of the Sixth International Brain–Computer Interface Meeting: brain–computer interfaces past, present, and future. Brain-computer interfaces. 2017;4(1–2):3–36. [PubMed: 29152523].

Remsik A, Young B, Vermilyea R, et al. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke. Expert review of medical devices. 2016;13(5):445–454. [PubMed: 27112213].

Kapsalyamov A, Hussain S, Sharipov A, Jamwal P. Brain–computer interface and assist as-needed model for upper limb robotic arm. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2019;11(9):1687814019875537.

Lin DJ, Finklestein SP, Cramer SC. New directions in treatments targeting stroke recovery. Stroke. 2018;49(12):3107–3114. [PubMed: 30571435].

Micera S, Caleo M, Chisari C, Hummel FC, Pedrocchi A. Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function. Neuron. 2020;105(4):604–620. [PubMed: 32078796].

Lule D, Noirhomme Q, Kleih SC, et al. Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(1):101–106. [PubMed: 22920562].

Wang F, He Y, Qu J, et al. A Brain-Computer Interface Based on Three-Dimensional Stereo Stimuli for Assisting Clinical Object Recognition Assessment in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(3):507–513. [PubMed: 30714927].

Xiao J, Pan J, He Y, et al. Visual Fixation Assessment in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness Based on Brain-Computer Interface. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(4):679–690. [PubMed: 30014347].

Xie Q, Pan J, Chen Y, et al. A gaze-independent audiovisual brain-computer Interface for detecting awareness of patients with disorders of consciousness. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):144. [PubMed: 30296948].

Xiao J, Pan J, He Y, et al. Visual fixation assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness based on brain-computer interface. Neuroscience bulletin. 2018;34(4):679–690. [PubMed: 30014347].

Xiao J, Xie Q, Lin Q, Yu T, Yu R, Li Y. Assessment of Visual Pursuit in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness Based on a Brain- Computer Interface. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2018;26(6):1141–1151. [PubMed: 29877838].

Chatelle C, Spencer CA, Cash SS, Hochberg LR, Edlow BL. Feasibility of an EEG-based brain-computer interface in the intensive care unit. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129(8):1519–1525. [PubMed: 29804044].

Lech M, Kucewicz MT, Czyzewski A. Human Computer Interface for Tracking Eye Movements Improves Assessment and Diagnosis of Patients With Acquired Brain Injuries. Front Neurol. 2019;10:6. [PubMed: 30728799].

Carella T, De Silvestri M, Finedore M, Haniff I, Esmailbeigi H. Emotion Recognition for Brain Machine Interface: Non-linear Spectral Analysis of EEG Signals Using Empirical Mode Decomposition. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference. 2018;2018:223–226.

Brandman DM, Cash SS, Hochberg LR. Review: Human Intracortical Recording and Neural Decoding for Brain-Computer Interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(10):1687–1696. [PubMed: 28278476].

Zapała D, Francuz P, Zapała E, et al. The impact of different visual feedbacks in user training on motor imagery control in BCI. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2018;43(1):23–35. [PubMed: 29075937].

Jeunet C, Lotte F, Batail J-M, Philip P, Franchi J-AM. Using recent BCI literature to deepen our understanding of clinical neurofeedback: A short review. Neuroscience. 2018;378:225–233. [PubMed: 29572165].

Schreuder M, Blankertz B, Tangermann M. A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: spatial hearing as an informative cue. PloS one. 2010;5(4).

Chatterjee A, Aggarwal V, Ramos A, Acharya S, Thakor NV. A brain-computer interface with vibrotactile biofeedback for haptic information. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2007;4(1):40. [PubMed: 17941986].

Lukoyanov M, Gordleeva SY, Pimashkin A, et al. The efficiency of the brain-computer interfaces based on motor imagery with tactile and visual feedback. Human Physiology. 2018;44(3):280-288.

Sitaram R, Caria A, Veit R, et al. FMRI brain-computer interface: a tool for neuroscientific research and treatment. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2007:25487. [PubMed: 18274615].

Coyle S, Ward T, Markham C, McDarby G. On the suitability of near-infrared (NIR) systems for next-generation brain-computer interfaces. Physiol Meas. 2004;25(4):815–822. [PubMed: 15382823].

Mellinger J, Schalk G, Braun C, et al. An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI). Neuroimage. 2007;36(3):581–593. [PubMed: 17475511].

Corsi MC, Chavez M, Schwartz D, et al. Integrating EEG and MEG Signals to Improve Motor Imagery Classification in Brain-Computer Interface. Int J Neural Syst. 2019;29(1):1850014. [PubMed: 29768971].

Deshpande G, Rangaprakash D, Oeding L, Cichocki A, Hu XP. A New Generation of Brain-Computer Interfaces Driven by Discovery of Latent EEG-fMRI Linkages Using Tensor. Decomposition. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:246. [PubMed: 28638316].

Hochberg LR, Donoghue JP. Sensors for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2006;25(5):32–38.

Rao RP. Towards neural co-processors for the brain: combining decoding and encoding in brain computer interfaces. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;55:142–151. [PubMed: 30954862].

Chiarelli AM, Croce P, Merla A, Zappasodi F. Deep learning for hybrid EEG-fNIRS brain computer interface: application to motor imagery classification. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(3):036028. [PubMed: 29446352].

Schwemmer MA, Skomrock ND, Sederberg PB, et al. Meeting brain-computer interface user performance expectations using a deep neural network decoding framework. Nature medicine. 2018;24(11):1669–1676.

Pandarinath C, Nuyujukian P, Blabe CH, et al. High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain- computer interface. Elife. 2017;6.

King CE, Wang PT, Mizuta M, et al. Noninvasive brain-computer interface driven hand orthosis. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference. 2011;2011:5786–5789.

Do AH, Wang PT, King CE, Chun SN, Nenadic Z. Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:111. [PubMed: 24321081].

Cantillo-Negrete J, Carino-Escobar RI, Carrillo-Mora P, Elias-Vinas D, Gutierrez-Martinez J. Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Coupled to a Robotic Hand Orthosis Aimed for Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients. J Healthc Eng. 2018;2018:1624637. [PubMed: 29849992].

Chowdhury A, Raza H, Meena YK, Dutta A, Prasad G. An EEG-EMG correlation-based brain-computer interface for hand orthosis supported neuro-rehabilitation. J Neurosci Methods. 2019;312:1–11. [PubMed: 30452976].

Aflalo T, Kellis S, Klaes C, et al. Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science. 2015;348(6237):906–910. [PubMed: 25999506].

Soekadar SR, Witkowski M, Vitiello N, Birbaumer N. An EEG/EOG-based hybrid brain-neural computer interaction (BNCI) system to control an exoskeleton for the paralyzed hand. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015;60(3):199–205. [PubMed: 25490027].

Bundy DT, Souders L, Baranyai K, et al. Contralesional Brain-Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors. Stroke. 2017;48(7):19081915. [PubMed: 28550098].

Frolov AA, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, et al. Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:400. [PubMed: 28775677].

Mohebbi A, Engelsholm SK, Puthusserypady S, Kjaer TW, Thomsen CE, Sorensen HB. A brain computer interface for robust wheelchair control application based on pseudorandom code modulated Visual Evoked Potential. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference. 2015;2015:602–605.

Abiyev RH, Akkaya N, Aytac E, Gunsel I, Cagman A. Brain-Computer Interface for Control of Wheelchair Using Fuzzy Neural Networks. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9359868. [PubMed: 27777953].

Yu Y, Zhou Z, Liu Y, et al. Self-Paced Operation of a Wheelchair Based on a Hybrid Brain Computer Interface Combining Motor Imagery and P300 Potential. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(12):2516–2526. [PubMed: 29220327].

Salisbury DB, Dahdah M, Driver S, Parsons TD, Richter KM. Virtual reality and brain computer interface in neurorehabilitation. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2016;29(2):124–127. [PubMed: 27034541].

Coogan CG, He B. Brain-computer interface control in a virtual reality environment and applications for the internet of things. IEEE Access. 2018;6:10840–10849. [PubMed: 30271700].

Johnson NN, Carey J, Edelman BJ, et al. Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain-computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(1):016009. [PubMed: 28914232].

Anumanchipalli GK, Chartier J, Chang EF. Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature. 2019;568(7753):493–498. [PubMed: 31019317].

Chartier J, Anumanchipalli GK, Johnson K, Chang EF. Encoding of Articulatory Kinematic Trajectories in Human Speech Sensorimotor Cortex. Neuron. 2018;98(5):1042–1054 e1044. [PubMed: 29779940].

Cheng J, Jin J, Daly I, et al. Effect of a combination of flip and zooming stimuli on the performance of a visual brain-computer interface for spelling. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2019;64(1):29 38. [PubMed: 29432199].

Riccio A, Holz EM, Arico P, et al. Hybrid P300-based brain-computer interface to improve usability for people with severe motor disability: electromyographic signals for error correction during a spelling task. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3 Suppl):S54–61. [PubMed: 25721548].

Kleih SC, Herweg A, Kaufmann T, Staiger-Salzer P, Gerstner N, Kubler A. The WIN-speller: a new intuitive auditory brain-computer interface spelling application. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:346. [PubMed: 26500476].

Chen X, Wang Y, Nakanishi M, Gao X, Jung TP, Gao S. High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain-computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(44):E6058–6067. [PubMed: 26483479].

Cecotti H Spelling with non-invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces--current and future trends. J Physiol Paris. 2011;105(1–3):106–114. [PubMed: 21911058].

Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, et al. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature. 2016;533(7602):247–250. [PubMed: 27074513].

Ajiboye AB, Willett FR, Young DR, et al. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. The Lancet. 2017;389(10081):1821–1830.

Sokunbi MO. Using real-time fMRI brain-computer interfacing to treat eating disorders. J Neurol Sci. 2018;388:109–114. [PubMed: 29627003].

Stoeckel LE, Garrison KA, Ghosh S, et al. Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;5:245–255. [PubMed: 25161891].

Ono T, Shindo K, Kawashima K, et al. Brain-computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:19. [PubMed: 25071543].

Moghimi S, Kushki A, Marie Guerguerian A, Chau T. A review of EEG-based brain-computer interfaces as access pathways for individuals with severe disabilities. Assistive Technology. 2013;25(2):99–110. [PubMed: 23923692].

Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims: a pilot study. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1091–1098. [PubMed: 23404723].

Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(2):86–100. [PubMed: 28003656].

Ramos‐Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al. Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Annals of neurology. 2013;74(1):100–108. [PubMed: 23494615].

Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 2011;134(5):1373–1386. [PubMed: 21515905].

Wilson RD, Bryden AM, Kilgore KL, et al. Neuromodulation for Functional Electrical Stimulation. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. 2019;30(2):301–318. [PubMed: 30954149].

Green AM, Kalaska JF. Learning to move machines with the mind. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34(2):61–75. [PubMed: 21176975].

Taylor DM, Tillery SIH, Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science. 2002;296(5574):1829–1832. [PubMed: 12052948].

Jarosiewicz B, Chase SM, Fraser GW, Velliste M, Kass RE, Schwartz AB. Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain- computer interface paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(49):19486–19491.

Shenoy KV, Carmena JM. Combining decoder design and neural adaptation in brain-machine interfaces. Neuron. 2014;84(4):665–680. [PubMed: 25459407].

Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2017;18(2):86. [PubMed: 28003656].

Hebb DO. The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. Wiley J; Chapman & Hall; 1949.

Miller KD. Synaptic economics: competition and cooperation in synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 1996;17(3):371–374. [PubMed: 8816700].

Jackson A, Zimmermann JB. Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord-restoring motor function. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8(12):690– 699. [PubMed: 23147846].

Serruya MD. Bottlenecks to clinical translation of direct brain-computer interfaces. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:226. [PubMed: 25520632].

Bowsher K, Civillico EF, Coburn J, et al. Brain-computer interface devices for patients with paralysis and amputation: a meeting report. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(2):023001. [PubMed: 26924826].

Food, Administration D. Implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) devices for patients with paralysis or amputation---Non-clinical testing and clinical considerations. US Food and Drug Administration. 2019.

Administration FaD. Implanted Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Devices for Patients with Paralysis or Amputation - Non-clinical Testing and Clinical Considerations Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff 2019.

Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Focal Epilepsy. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts. https://www.bluecrossma.com/common/en_US/medical_policies/716%20Responsive%20Neurostimulation%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of% 20Refractory%20Focal%20Epilepsy%20prn.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2019, 2019.

Aliev MA, Kholmurodova KK., Quvondiqov QA, Boymatov NN. Surgical treatment of the patients with Parkinson's disease (Samarkand experience). Abstracts of IVth Congress of Neurosurgeons of Uzbekistan. 4-6 September 2025. Khiva, Khorezm region, Uzbekistan.

Prospectus: Amendment No. 3 to F-1 Registration ReWalk Robotics Ltd; Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ 1607962/000119312514321636/d724635df1a.htm. Published 2014. Accessed.

Bowsher K, Civillico E, Coburn J, et al. Brain–computer interface devices for patients with paralysis and amputation: a meeting report. Journal of neural engineering. 2016;13(2):023001. [PubMed: 26924826].

Biello PNH Vet Becomes First Fitted With Two ‘LUKE’ Arms. NHPR. New Hampshire Public Radio Web site. https://www.nhpr.org/post/nh-vet-becomes-first-fitted-two-luke-arms#stream/0.Published 2018. Accessed March, 2019.

Ortiz-Catalan M, Mastinu E, Sassu P, Aszmann O, Brånemark R. Self-Contained Neuromusculoskeletal Arm Prostheses. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(18):1732–1738. [PubMed: 32348644].

Fritz H, Patzer D, Galen SS. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: promises, pitfalls, and opportunities. Disability and rehabilitation. 2019;41(5):560–563. [PubMed: 29110547].

Gardner AD, Potgieter J, Noble FK. A review of commercially available exoskeletons’ capabilities. Paper presented at: 2017 24th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP)2017.

Bissolotti L, Nicoli F, Picozzi M. Domestic Use of the Exoskeleton for Gait Training in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries: Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Practice. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2018;12:78. [PubMed: 29497359].

ReWalk. ReWalk https://rewalk.com/training-centers/. Published 2019. Accessed.

Weber LM, Stein J. The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: A narrative review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):99–110. [PubMed: 30056437].

Rojek A, Mika A, Oleksy Ł, Stolarczyk A, Kielnar R. Effects of Exoskeleton Gait Training on Balance, Load Distribution, and Functional Status in Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;10:1344. [PubMed: 32010039].

Pratt AK, Chang JJ, Sederstrom NO. A Fate Worse Than Death: Prognostication of Devastating Brain Injury. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(4):591–598. [PubMed: 30855326].

Slutzky MW, Flint RD. Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals. Journal of neurophysiology. 2017;118(2):1329– 1343. [PubMed: 28615329].

Salatino JW, Ludwig KA, Kozai TD, Purcell EK. Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain. Nature biomedical engineering. 2017;1(11):862–877.

Ravikumar M, Sunil S, Black J, et al. The roles of blood-derived macrophages and resident microglia in the neuroinflammatory response to implanted intracortical microelectrodes. Biomaterials. 2014;35(28):8049–8064. [PubMed: 24973296].

Wellman SM, Eles JR, Ludwig KA, et al. A materials roadmap to functional neural interface design. Advanced functional materials. 2018;28(12):1701269. [PubMed: 29805350].

Hochberg LR, Donoghue JP. Sensors for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 2006;25(5):32– 38.

Sillay KA, Ondoma S, Wingeier B, et al. Long-Term Surface Electrode Impedance Recordings Associated with Gliosis for a Closed-Loop Neurostimulation Device. Annals of neurosciences. 2018;25(4):289–298. [PubMed: 31000969].

Parker RA, Davis TS, House PA, Normann RA, Greger B. The functional consequences of chronic, physiologically effective intracortical microstimulation. In: Progress in brain research. Vol 194. Elsevier; 2011:145–165. [PubMed: 21867801].

Martini ML, Oermann EK, Opie NL, Panov F, Oxley T, Yaeger K. Sensor modalities for brain-computer interface technology: a comprehensive literature review. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):E108–E117. [PubMed: 31361011].

Thompson C, Patel PR, Chestek CA, Li W, Purcell EK. Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system. Journal of Neural Engineering. 2020.

Das R, Moradi F, Heidari H. Biointegrated and Wirelessly Powered Implantable Brain Devices: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems. 2020.

Silva GA. A New Frontier: The Convergence of Nanotechnology, Brain Machine Interfaces, and Artificial Intelligence. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:843. [PubMed: 30505265].

Scaini D, Ballerini L. Nanomaterials at the neural interface. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;50:50–55. [PubMed: 29289930].

Hong G, Yang X, Zhou T, Lieber CM. Mesh electronics: a new paradigm for tissue-like brain probes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;50:33–41. [PubMed: 29202327].

Letourneau S, Zewdie ET, Jadavji Z, Andersen J, Burkholder LM, Kirton A. Clinician awareness of brain computer interfaces: a Canadian national survey. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2020;17(1):1–14. [PubMed: 31900169].

Hendriks S, Grady C, Ramos KM, et al. Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices: A Review. JAMA neurology. 2019;76(12):1506–1514.

Shih JJ, Krusienski DJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(3):268–279. [PubMed: 22325364].

Young MJ, Scheinberg E. The Rise of Crowdfunding for Medical Care: Promises and Perils. JAMA. 2017;317(16):1623–1624. [PubMed: 28334321].

Judson TJ, Dhruva SS, Redberg RF. Evaluation of technologies approved for supplemental payments in the United States. Bmj. 2019;365:l2190. [PubMed: 31209124].

Young M Brain-Computer Interfaces and the Philosophy of Action. AJOB neuroscience. 2020;11(1):4. [PubMed: 32009595].

Bernat JL. Medical Decision Making by Patients in the Locked-in Syndrome. Neuroethics. 2018:1–10.

Gilbert F, Cook M, O’Brien T, Illes J. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in human “intelligent BCI” trial. Science and engineering ethics. 2019;25(1):83–96. [PubMed: 29129011].

Agarwal A, Dowsley R, McKinney ND, et al. Protecting Privacy of Users in Brain-Computer Interface Applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2019;27(8):1546–1555. [PubMed: 31283483].

Kögel J, Jox RJ, Friedrich O. What is it like to use a BCI?–insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users. BMC Medical Ethics. 2020;21(1):1–14. [PubMed: 31906925].

Greely HT, Grady C, Ramos KM, et al. Neuroethics guiding principles for the NIH BRAIN initiative. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;38(50):10586. [PubMed: 30541767].

Shook JR, Giordano J. Neuroethics beyond normal: Performance enablement and self transformative technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2016;25(1):121–140. [PubMed: 26788953].

Eaton ML, Illes J. Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology—the ethical terrain. Nature biotechnology. 2007;25(4):393–397.

Klein E Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identifying risks and exploring meaning. Science and engineering ethics. 2016;22(5):1299–1317. [PubMed: 26497727].

Nijboer F, Clausen J, Allison BZ, Haselager P. The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing. Neuroethics. 2013;6:541–578. [PubMed: 24273623].

Young MJ. Bioenhancements and the telos of medicine. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18(4):515–522. [PubMed: 25802072].

Salles A, Bjaalie JG, Evers K, et al. The Human Brain Project: Responsible Brain Research for the Benefit of Society. Neuron. 2019;101(3):380–384. [PubMed: 30731062].

Загрузки

##submissions.published##

2025-11-19