THE LEGAL BASIS FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Authors

  • Akhunov Sherzod Adkhamovich

Keywords:

World Trade Organization, arbitration, disputes, Dispute Settlement Body, consultations, mechanisms, commissions

Abstract

In this article, the issues of dispute resolution within the World Trade Organization, the stages and terms of dispute consideration are analyzed from a scientific and theoretical point of view. An attempt has been made to shed light on the legal nature and role of the World Trade Organization in resolving disputes between member states of the organization. Also, each stage of dispute resolution within the framework of an international organization is discussed separately and the procedure for their formation, timing and consideration is described.

References

Van Bael 1988, 68; Vermulst 1995, 134; Vermulst and Driessen 1995, 135.

Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes. Annex 2 of the WTO Agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm

Davis С. WTO Dispute Settlement as a Tool for Conflict Management / С.Davis // Doctoral thesis. Journal of University of London. – 2015. № 5 – P. 133-233.

Вельяминов Г.М. Порядок урегулирования споров в ВТО / Г.М.Вельяминнов // Моск. журн. междунар. права. – 1999. - № 13.- С. 97-100. (Velyaminov G.M. Dispute Settlement Procedure in the WTO / G.M.Veljaminnov // Moscow Journal of International Law. – 1999. - № 13.- P. 97-100.)

WTO Dispute DS22. Brazil – Measures Affecting Desiccated Coconut. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds22_e.htm; Stewart, Terence P. “Case 101A - Brazil -Measures Affecting Desiccated Coconut.” Handbook of WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement. Stewart and Stewart. Brill Online, 2015.

WTO Dispute DS58. United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm

Kelly T. The WTO environment and health and safety standards // The World Economy. 2003. Vol. 26. Is. 2. P. 144–145.

Кадышева О.В. Комментарий по спору России – Антидемпинговые пошлины в отношении легких коммерческих автомобилей из Германии и Италии / О.В.Кадышева // Право ВТО. – 2015. - № 1. – С. 80-83. (Kadysheva O.V. Commentary on the Russian dispute – Antidumping duties on light commercial vehicles from Germany and Italy / O.V. Kadysheva // WTO Law. – 2015. - № 1. – P. 80-83.)

Ланьи П.А. Система разрешения споров в ВТО: обзор новых трендов / П.А.Ланьи // Журн. «Мосты». – 2015. - № 6. - С. 6-10. (Lanyi P.A. Dispute Settlement System in the WTO: Review of New Trends / P.A.Lanyi // Journal “Bridges”. - 2015. - № 6. - P. 6-10.)

Смбатян А.С. Классификация мер как причины возникновения споров ВТО. – Ч. I / А.С.Смбатян // Евраз. юрид. журн. – 2015. - № 8. - С. 8-10. (Smbatyan A.S. Classification of measures as a cause of WTO disputes. – Part I / A.S.Smbatyan // Eurasian legal journal. – 2015. - № 8. - P. 8-10.)

Published

2024-11-09