"XORAZM VILOYATIDAGI GURUHLARNI O'RGANISH NATIJALARI ORQALI QANDLI DIABET 2 TUR BOSHLANISHIDA XAVF OMILLARINI ANIQLASH"
##article.subject##:
prediabeest, type 2 diabetes mellitus, risk factors##article.abstract##
Dolzarbligi. 2-tur qandli diabet (QD 2) va bemorlarning nogironligi va erta o'lishiga olib kelishi mumkin, sog'liqni saqlash tizimlari uchun katta xarajatlarni keltirib chiqaradi va shu bilan dunyoning ko'p mamlakatlariga sog'liqni saqlashning katta muammosi keltirib chiqaradi.
Maqsad. Xorazm viloyatidagi guruhlarni o'rganish natijalariga asoslanib, QD 2 ning xavf omillarini aniqlash.
Material va uslublar. Xorazm endokrinologik dispanseri asosida 2327 nafar ishtirokchi kiritilgan. Qandli diabetning haqiqiy xavfi, diabetning (GDRlar) tomonidan 1 yillik diabetning 5 yillik ehtimolligini baholaydigan diabet xavf shkalasi bilan belgilandi
Natijalar. So'rov natijalariga ko'ra, 2327 ishtirokchi orasida kundalik diabetning keyingi 5 yil davomida real xavfi 59,5%, o'rtacha 16,4% va yuqori darajada o'sdi.
Xulosa. 1. Hozirgi ma'lumotlar ko'pchilikning kattalardagi xavflarni baholashdan foydalangan holda, diabetning katta yoshdagi kattalar aholisi orasida diabet xavfini past his qiladi, hatto diabetning katta qismini xavfni baholash xavfi yuqori. 2. Aholi orasida diabet xavfi to'g'risidagi e'tiqodlarni yanada oshirish va nazorat qilish zarurati isbotlangan.
Библиографические ссылки
Adriaanse MC, Snoek FJ, Dekker JM, et al.. Perceived risk for type 2 diabetes in participants in a stepwise population-screening programme. //Diabet Med 2003;20:210–5. 10.1046/j.1464- 5491.2003.00901.x
Adriaanse MC, Twisk JWR, Dekker JM, et al.. Perceptions of risk in adults with a low or high risk profile of developing type 2 diabetes; a cross-sectional population-based study. //Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:307–12. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.009
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National diabetes statistics report. 2017. US department of health and Human services. Atlanta, GA. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/statistics-report.html [Accessed March 2019].
Claassen L, Henneman L, Nijpels G, et al.. Causal beliefs and perceptions of risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, the Netherlands, 2007. // Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8.
German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke German Diabetes Risk Score - Personal Test. Available:
Godino JG, van Sluijs EMF, Sutton S, et al.. Understanding perceived risk of type 2 diabetes in healthy middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study of associations with modelled risk, clinical risk factors, and psychological factors. //Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;106:412–9. 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.10.004
Graham GN, Leath B, Payne K, et al.. Perceived versus actual risk for hypertension and diabetes in the African American community. //Health Promot Pract 2006;7:34–46. 10.1177/1524839905283891
Haw JS, Galaviz KI, Straus AN, et al.. Long-term sustainability of diabetes prevention approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. //JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1808–17. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6040
Hivert M-F, Warner AS, Shrader P, et al.. Diabetes risk perception and intention to adopt healthy Lifest yles among primary care patients. //Diabetes Care 2009;32:1820–2. 10.2337/dc09-0720
Hu FB, Satija A, Manson JE. Curbing the diabetes pandemic: the need for global policy solutions. //JAMA 2015;313:2319–20. 10.1001/jama.2015.5287
Ibrahim M, Tuomilehto J, Aschner P, et al.. Global status of diabetes prevention and prospects for action: a consensus statement. //Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2018;34:e3021 10.1002/dmrr.3021
International Diabetes Federation Chapter 3: The global picture : //IDF diabetes atlas. 8th edn Brussels, Belgium, 2017: 40–65.]
Kowall B, Rathmann W, Stang A, et al.. Perceived risk of diabetes seriously underestimates actual diabetes risk: the KorA FF4 study. // PLoS One 2017;12:e0171152 10.1371/journal.pone.0171152
Mühlenbruch K, Joost HG, Boeing H, et al.. Risk prediction for type 2 diabetes in the German population with the updated German diabetes risk score (GDRS). Ernaehrungs Umschau 2014;61:90–3.
Paprott R, Mühlenbruch K, Mensink GBM, et al.. Validation of the German diabetes risk score among the general adult population: findings from the German health interview and examination surveys. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2016;4:e000280 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016- 000280
Piccinino L, Griffey S, Gallivan J, et al.. Recent trends in diabetes knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors: implications for national diabetes education. Health Educ Behav 2015;42:687–96. 10.1177/1090198115577373
Pligt J. Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour. //Br J Health Psychol 1998;3:1–14. 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1998.tb00551.x
Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Boeing H, et al.. An accurate risk score based on anthropometric, dietary, and lifestyle factors to predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:510–5. 10.2337/dc06-2089
Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. // Psychol Bull 2014;140:511–43. 10.1037/a0033065
Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, et al.. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. //The Lancet 2012;379:2279–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9
World Health Organisation Part 2: preventing diabetes. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016: 34–45. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204871/9789241565257_eng.pdf;jsessionid=3 263530A34BD3CE67600D37307290269?sequence=1
Yang K, Baniak LM, Imes CC, et al.. Perceived versus actual risk of type 2 diabetes by race and ethnicity. Diabetes Educ 2018;44:269–77. 10.1177/0145721718770983
Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. //Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018;14:88–98. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151
