CLINICAL AND NEUROIMAGING TECHNIQUES IN PREDICTION OF REGRESS OF MOTOR DEFICIENCY AFTER CEREBRAL STROKE FOR PREVENTION OF FALLS

Authors

  • MAVLYANOVA Zilola Farkhadovna
  • GIZATULLIN Rinat Raisovich
  • BAYKOV Denis Enverovich
  • XARISOVA Elvira Mullanurovna
  • AHMADEYEVA Leyla Rinatovna

Keywords:

stroke, motor deficit, rehabilitation, neuroimaging, prevention of falls

Abstract

Since disorders of motor system are the most common cause of disability and falls in patients after stroke, an important issue was and remains the prediction of recovery of motor functions after a stroke. Various authors in their works write that the initial state of motor disorders of the upper limb is the most influential predictor of recovery of the upper limb. Early prediction of motor recovery is difficult, especially in patients with severe initial impairment, and the degree of corticospinal tract (CST) injury may be associated with motor outcomes in these patients. Neuronal plasticity is closely related to the integrity of the CST, and poor motor outcome is expected in cases of extensive CST impairment registered by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This review will consider several clinical scales that are used by the community to assess the regression of motor deficits.

References

Мавлянова З. Ф., Кулмирзаева Х. И. Клинико-нейровизуализационная картина ишемического инсульта в остром периоде //Вестник казахского национального медицинского университета. – 2015. – №. 2. – С. 87-89.

Christidi F. et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging as a Prognostic Tool for Recovery in Acute and Hyperacute Stroke //Neurology International. – 2022. – Т. 14. – №. 4. – С. 841-874.

Юсупова Н. Н., Мавлянова З. Ф., Джурабекова А. Т. Коррекция болевого синдрома у больных с острым нарушением мозгового кровообращения //Российский журнал боли. – 2015. – №. 1. – С. 98-98.

Ризаев Ж. А., Хайдаров Н. К. Клиническое, эпидемиологическое и этиопатогенетическое исследование ишемического инсульта //журнал неврологии и нейрохирургических исследований. – 2020. – Т. 1. – №. 1.

Саттарова Д. Б. и др. Эрготерапия как составная часть реабилитации пациентов после инсульта //Academy. – 2020. – №. 4 (55). – С. 87-92.

Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Langton Hewer R. Predicting Barthel ADL Score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1983b; 64: 24–28.

Parker V. M., Wade D. T., Hewer R. L. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery //International rehabilitation medicine. – 1986. – Т. 8. – №. 2. – С. 69- 73.

Olsen T. S. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation //Stroke. – 1990. – Т. 21. – №. 2. – С. 247-251.

Feys H. et al. Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination //Physiotherapy Research International. – 2000. – Т. 5. – №. 1. – С. 1- 18.

Шамсиддинова М. Ш. и др. РОЛЬ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ В КОМПЛЕКСЕ РЕАБИЛИТАЦИОННЫХ МЕРОПРИЯТИЙ ПРИ ПОСТИНСУЛЬТНОМ ТРЕВОЖНО-ДЕПРЕССИВНОМ СИНДРОМЕ //Eurasian Journal of Academic Research. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 6. – С. 1109-1111.

Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Outlook after an acute stroke: urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 1985; 56: 601–608.

Barer D. H., Mitchell J. R. A. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: do multivariate models help? //QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. – 1989. – Т. 70. – №. 1. – С. 27-39.

Kalra L., Smith D. H., Crome P. Stroke in patients aged over 75 years: outcome and predictors //Postgraduate Medical Journal. – 1993. – Т. 69. – №. 807. – С. 33-36.

Jimenez J., Morgan P. P. Predicting improvement in stroke patients referred for inpatient rehabilitation //Canadian Medical Association Journal. – 1979. – Т. 121. – №. 11. – С. 1481.

КИМ О. А., МАВЛЯНОВА З. Ф. РЕАБИЛИТАЦИОННЫЙ ПОТЕНЦИАЛ КАК СОСТАВЛЯЮЩАЯ ПРОЦЕССА РЕСОЦИАЛИЗАЦИИ МОЛОДЫХ С ИШЕМИЧЕСКИМ ИНСУЛЬТОМ //ЖУРНАЛ БИОМЕДИЦИНЫ И ПРАКТИКИ. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 2.

Galski T. et al. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. The dominant role of higher-order cognition //Stroke. – 1993. – Т. 24. – №. 12. – С. 1794-1800.

Engberg A., Garde B., Kreiner S. Rasch analysis in the development of a rating scale for assessment of mobility after stroke //Acta neurologica scandinavica. – 1995. – Т. 91. – №. 2. – С. 118-127.

Gowland C. Predicting sensorimotor recovery following stroke rehabilitation //Physiotherapy Can. – 1984. – Т. 36. – С. 313-320.

Loewen S. C., Anderson B. A. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales //Stroke. – 1990. – Т. 21. – №. 1. – С. 78-81.

Duncan P. W., Propst M., Nelson S. G. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident //Physical therapy. – 1983. – Т. 63. – №. 10. – С. 1606-1610.

De Weerdt W., Lincoln N. B., Harrison M. A. Prediction of arm and hand function recovery in stroke patients //International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. – 1987. – Т. 10. – С. 110- 112.

De Weerdt WJG, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm–hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnström–Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research test. Physiotherapy Canada 1985; 37: 65–70.

Rand D., Eng J. J. Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke //Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. – 2015. – Т. 24. – №. 2. – С. 274-283.

Liu G. et al. Motor recovery prediction with clinical assessment and local diffusion homogeneity after acute subcortical infarction //Stroke. – 2017. – Т. 48. – №. 8. – С. 2121- 2128.

Puig J. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke //Neuroradiology. – 2017. – Т. 59. – С. 343-351.

Bigourdan A. et al. Early fiber number ratio is a surrogate of corticospinal tract integrity and predicts motor recovery after stroke //Stroke. – 2016. – Т. 47. – №. 4. – С. 1053-1059.

Hendricks H. T. et al. Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials //Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. – 2002. – Т. 83. – №. 9. – С. 1303-1308.

Thomalla G. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging detects early Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke //Neuroimage. – 2004. – Т. 22. – №. 4. – С. 1767-1774.

Puig J. et al. Wallerian degeneration in the corticospinal tract evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging correlates with motor deficit 30 days after middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke //American Journal of Neuroradiology. – 2010. – Т. 31. – №. 7. – С. 1324-1330.

Kim O. A., Dzhurabekova A. T. Comparative aspect of the etiopathogenesis of ischemic stroke at a young age //Science and practice: Implementation to Modern society Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference MANCHESTER, GREAT BRITAIN. – 2020. – Т. 2628. – С. 177-180.

J. M. Newton, N. S. Ward, G. J. M. Parker et al., “Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas–relevance to stroke recovery,” Brain, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 18441858, 2006.

Riley J. D. et al. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy //Stroke. – 2011. – Т. 42. – №. 2. – С. 421-426.

Kim O. A. et al. Analysis of the subtypes of ischemic stroke in young age //European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. – 2020. – Т. 7. – №. 2. – С. 2509-2514.

Boyd L. A. et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable //International Journal of Stroke. – 2017. – Т. 12. – №. 5. – С. 480-493.

Published

2023-05-27