IMPACT OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE ON VACCINATION ACCEPTABILITY

Authors

  • TODJIKHUJAEV Shoyatbek Shukurillo Ogly
  • MAMARASULOVA Dilfuza Zakirjanovna
  • INAKOVA Barno Bakhodirovna

Keywords:

COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccines, population

Abstract

This article describes the efficiency of the vaccine for overcoming the COVID-19, the methods of the  prediction against coronavirus has beeen revealed by deviding population for sex, age and marital status. Each of the cases was devided to the 4 groups and rated according to the results. The participants were randomly devided to one of nine groups to reduce response burden. the reaserar showed the predictable number of getting low level of sideeffects compared to the high probability of clinically important benefits

References

J. Corum, S. Wee, C. Zimmer, Coronavirus vaccine tracker. NY Times (2021). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html. Accessed 20 January 2021.Google Scholar

A. Srivastav et al., Influenza vaccination hesitancy among adults, United States, 2018 National internet flu survey. https://apha.confex.com/apha/2019/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/431979. Accessed 20 January 2021.Google Scholar

A. A. Malik, S. M. McFadden, J. Elharake, S. B. Omer, Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine 26, 100495 (2020).Google Scholar

S. Kreps et al., Factors associated with US adults’ likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2025594 (2020).Google Scholar

Rizaev J.A., Rizaev E.A., Akhmadaliev N.N. Current View of the Problem: A New Approach to Covid-19 Treatment// Medigo-legal update An Internasional journal. 2020, vol 20, N4 India, С1103-1109

D. V. Makarov et al., American Urological Association and Society for Medical Decision Making Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared decision making and prostate cancer screening. Urol. Pract. 5, 444–451 (2017).Google Scholar

L. A. Hampson et al., Patient-centered treatment decisions for urethral stricture: Conjoint analysis improves surgical decision-making. Urology 99, 246–253 (2017).Google Scholar

D. A. Lane, J. Meyerhoff, U. Rohner, G. Y. H. Lip, Atrial fibrillation patient preferences for oral anticoagulation and stroke knowledge: Results of a conjoint analysis. Clin. Cardiol. 41, 855–861 (2018).Google Scholar

P. Schmid, D. Rauber, C. Betsch, G. Lidolt, M.-L.Denker, Barriers of influenza vaccination intention and behavior—a systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005–2016. PLoS One 12, e0170550 (2017).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

US Census Bureau, QuickFacts United States (2021). https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/. Accessed 20 January 2021.Google Scholar

E. A. Belongia et al., Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 942–951 (2016).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

C. B. Bridges; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm. Rep. 51, 1–31 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar

E. Dubé et al., Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 9, 1763–1773 (2013).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

J. Kennedy, Vaccine hesitancy: A growing concern. Paediatr. Drugs 22, 105–111 (2020).Google Scholar

Anonymous, Allergic reactions including anaphylaxis after receipt of the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine—United States. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 70, 125–129 (2021).Google Scholar

N. H. Anderson, Foundations of Information Integration Theory (Academic, New York, 1981).Google Scholar

M. J. Hornsey, M. Finlayson, G. Chatwood, C. T. Begeny, Donald Trump and vaccination: The effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 88, 103947 (2020).Google Scholar

S. L. Wilson, C. Wiysonge, Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Glob.Health 5, e004206 (2020).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

S. M. Wishik, Attitudes and reactions of the public to health programs. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health 48, 139–141 (1958).Google Scholar

Умурзаков З.Б., Ризаев Ж.А., Умиров С.Э. ОСНОВЫ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ АДЕКВАТНОЙ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ПРОФИЛАКТИКИ COVID-19// Проблемы биологии и медицины, 2021, №2 (127) с134-140

Published

2022-05-30