COMPARATIVE SHORT TERM STUDY OF POSTERIOR CHAMBER PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES FOR THE CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA. (ICL VS IPCL)
Keywords:
High myopia; posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens, implantable collamer lens, implantable phakic contact lens, visual acuity, vault, intraocular pressureAbstract
To evaluate early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber pIOLs for correction of patients with high myopia during 6 months post-op period. This study is based on comparative study of first clinical experience to correct high myopia with implantation of EVO+ Visian ICL (implantable collamer lens) and Implantable phakic contact lens IPCL to patients in Uzbekistan.
References
Espandar L, Meyer JJ, Moshirfar M. Phakic intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmology. 2008; 19(4): 349-356.
Barsam A, Allan BD. Eximer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1: CD007679.
Green JS, Bear JC, Johnson GJ. The burden of genetically determined eye disease. Br. J. Ophthalmology 1986; 70: 696 – 9.
Munier A, Gunning T, Kenny D, et al. Causes of blindness in the adult population of the Republic of Irland. Br. J. Ophthalmology 1998; 82: 630-3.
Zaldivar R, Davidorf JM, Osherow S, Ricur G, Piezzi V. Combined posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis: bioptics for extreme myopia. Journal Refractive Surgery 1999; 15: 299 - 308.
Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, Hanselmayer G, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Outcome after treatment of ametropia with implantable contact lenses. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2153-2161.
Karandikar S, Bhandari V, Reddy J. Outcomes of implantable collamer lens v4 and v4c for correction of high myopia. Nepal Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 7(14): 164 - 172.
Kamilov Kh, Zaynutdinov N. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior phakic intraocular lens (EVO/EVO+ Visian ICL) for correction of patients with high refractive errors. First clinical experience in Uzbekistan. Uzbek Medical Journal 2020; SI-2-11:66-74. DOI: http:dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-0664-2020-SI-2-11.
Kamilov Kh, Kasimova M, Zaynutdinov N. New approaches of implantation of posterior chamber phakic IOL`s to patients with high refractive errors. Point of View, East – West. Scientific practical journal. 2019; 4:40-46. DOI: https://doi.org/l0.25276/2410-1257-20l9-4-40-46.
Bandary V. et al. Journal of Current Ophthalmology 2015; 27: 76-81.
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, et al. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96: 409-12.
Igarashi A, Kamiya k, Shimizu K, Komatsu M. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ kertatomileusis for high myopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009; 148:164-170.
Robert Montes-Mico et al. Posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port: a review, Acta Ophthalmica. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14599
Gitansha S, Dandapani R, Long-term safety of posterior chamber implantable phakic contact lens for the correction of myopia. Clinical Ophthalmology 2019; 13: 137-142.
Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmology 2016; 1059-1077.
Packer M. The implantable collamer lens with a central port: review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmology 2018; 2427-2438.
