TEXNIKA UNIVERSITETLARDA INGLIZ TILINI O'QITISHDA JUFT VA GURUH ISHLARINING AHAMIYATI
##article.subject##:
juftishlash, guruhishi, texnik mutaxassisliklar, ta'lim, aloqa##article.abstract##
Maqolada texnika universitetlardaxorijiy (ingliz) tilini o'qitish jarayonida asosiy muammolar va vazifalar ko'rib chiqiladi. O'quv jarayonini tashkil etishning asosiy usullari va tamoyillari keltirilgan. Xulosa shuki, kommunikativ usul tobora dominant pozitsiyani egallashni boshlaydi. Ushbu maqolada, muloqot sinfidagi juftlik va guruh ishi, ayniqsa, aniqlik nuqtai nazaridan, ikkinchi tilni rivojlantirishga qanday hissa qo'shishini batafsil muhokama qilamiz. Ishlash va samaradorlikni oshirish: birgalikda yaxshi ishlaydigan guruhlar o'z-o'zidan ishlaydigan shaxslardan ko'ra ko'proq narsalarga erishishlari mumkin. Keng ko'lamli ko'nikmalar amaliyotga tatbiq etilishi mumkin va fikr almashish va muhokama qilish muayyan mavzudagi tushunchangizni chuqurlashtirishda muhim rol o'ynashi mumkin. Juftlikda ishlash alohida talabalarga nutq uchun ko'p vaqt beradi. Guruhlar o'quvchilarga murakkab suhbatlar yaratish, belgilar o'rtasidagi munosabatlarni o'rganish, bilimlarni bir joyga to'plash va ko'proq ijtimoiy muhitga ega bo'lish imkoniyatini beradi.
Библиографические ссылки
Methods of teaching spoken English // British Council. – Access mode: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/forum-topic/methods-teaching-spoken-english
Roger Perkin. Push yourself because, no one else is going to do it for you // What is Motivation? – Access mode: http://www.rogerperkin.co.uk/ccie/ motivation/what-is-motivation
Class C., Dietrichs I., Hunziker B., Joss M., Rieder U. From Competent Student to Confident Engineer: Redesigning Engineering Education in Response to Economic and Social Change. – Access mode: http://www.cclass.ch/Dokumente/34thEES-Class.pdf.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, p.144.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., &Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141-152.
N. N. Bulgakova and N. V. KuzminaIntensivnoeobuchenieinostrannimyazikam: teoriyaipraktika / G.A. Kitaygorodskaya. – M.: Vissh. shkola, 2011. p.13.
KanunnikovaO.G. Texnologiyasotrudnichestvakaksistemoobrazuyushiykomponentkollektivnogosposobavzaimodeystviya // Modernizatsiyaobrazovaniya / podred. L.I. Arxarovoy, O.L.Yegorovoy, T.V. Ivkinoy. 2016. – 8.G. K. SelevkoiDyachenko, V. K. Sotrudnichestvovobuchenii: Okollektivnomsposobeuchebnoyraboti / V. K. Dyachenko. − M. :Prosveщenie, 1991. − 192 s.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction.Applied Linguistics 17: pp.38‒62.
/11Phipps, S. & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), pp.380-390.
