LANGUAGE UNITS EXPRESSING EMOTIONS AS A PRODUCT OF NATIONAL CHARACTER AND NATIONAL MENTALITY
Keywords:
language, emotion, national character, national mentality, nation, traditionAbstract
Language embodying different characteristics of a speaker, it represents the concepts of national character and national mentality as well. If we compare the national character of people with national customs using linguistic units, we can witness many interesting and unique ways of expression. Human mental experiences and character are also realized due to this function of language and become a certain linguistic appearance. The moods, inner experiences, and national character of representatives of various cultures differ in linguistic expression. This article also presents the language units expressing emotions as a product of national character and national mentality. The issueis analyzed on the basis of the views of many linguists investigated in this field.
References
.Верещагин Е. М.Костомаров В.Г. Лингвострановедческая теория слова. – М., 1980, 61 с 2.Гумбольт В. Язык и философия культуры / В. Гумбольдт. М., Прогресс, 1985, 285 с
Кон И. С. Националный характер – миф или реальность? // Иностранная литература. 1968. № 9. С. 215-229
Тер Минасова С.Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация // С.Г. Тер Минасова. – М.,2000. 264 с
Фром Э. Душа Человека. М, 1992
Foolen A. The expressive function of language: Towards a cognitive semantic approach// The Language of Emotions. Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 1997.– P.15
Shakhovskiy V., Zhura V. Deixis in Emotive Speech //Questions of General Linguistics. – 2002. – № 5. – P. 38-57.
Shakhovskiy V. Types of Emotive Vocabulary //Questions of General Linguistics. – 1994. – № 1. – P. 20-25.
Wierzbicka A. Emotions across language and cultures: diversity and universals. – Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 345
Wierzbicka A. Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Universal Human Conceptsin Culture-Specific Configurations / Anna Wierzbicka. – New York : Oxford :Oxford University Press, 1992. – 487