MORPHOLOGICAL CAUSATION
Keywords:
causation, causator, derivation, causaoperand, causaoperator, causaderivat, analytical toolAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the concept of causation in linguistics. In it, mainly, causation is studied from a morphological point of view. In many works where morphological causation is distinguished, it is assumed that this type of causation is caused by special suffixes, that is, forms of the motive voice of the verb. This, in turn, is manifested in agglutinative languages. The concept of causation is studied in languages as a universal category. Because this concept, one way or another, is found in all languages, but differs in the ways of expression. Causation comes from the Latin word “cause”, which basically means the concept of “cause”. In most cases, the concept of causation is associated with the stimulus of the verb and is called the action taken by a person under the influence of another person. In our opinion, it is unacceptable to limit causation only to its meaning “cause”. If you notice that the action of one person is influenced by another, then we can see that it is common with the values of purpose, condition and effect. After all, the action of one person under the influence of another is not only connected with the cause. Therefore, in modern linguistics, the study of causative meaning is problematic. This article explains these explanatory questions.
We believe that there is no linguistic meaning if the analytical expression of causation is studied separately from morphology. Therefore, it is necessary to study the formation of causation by analytical means as a kind of morphological type. In addition, causation should be interpreted as a means of expressing grammatical meaning, and not as a grammatical category.
References
Aбдиев Т.К. Конструкции с каузативными глаголами в киргизском языке.–Бишкек: Манас, 2009; Абумова О.Д. Структурная типология тюркских причинно-следственных конструкций и ее семантическая реализация в хакасском языке//Автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук:–Новосибирск, 2002; Сымулов М.Г. Способы выражения каузативных отношений в разноструктурных языках: на материале английского и чувашского языков//Автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук:–Чебоксары, 2006; Тажибаева С.Ж. Способы выражения каузальных отношений в казахском языке//Автореф. дис. док. филол. наук:–Новосибирск, 2004 (Abdiev T.K. Structures with causative verbs in the Kyrgyz language.–Bishkek: Manas, 2009; Abumova O.D. Structural typology of Turkic causal structures and its semantic implementation in the Khakass language//Abstract. dis. Cand. filol. Sciences:–Novosibirsk, 2002; Symulov M.G. Ways of expressing causative relations in different structural languages: on the material of English and Chuvash languages//Abstract. dis. Cand. filol. Sciences:–Cheboksary, 2006; Tazhibaeva S.J. Ways of expressing causal relations in the Kazakh language//Abstract. dis. Doc. filol. Sciences:–Novosibirsk, 2004).
Abduazizov A.A. Tilshunoslik nazariyasiga kirish.–T.: Sharq, 2010 (Abduazizov A.A. Introduction to the theory of linguistics. –T.: Sharq, 2010).
Аматов А.М., Филимонов Н.Г. Каузативные аффиксы в современном английском языке//Научные ведомости, № 6, 2012 (Amatov A.M., Filimonov N.G. Causative Affixes in Modern English // Scientific Bulletin, No. 6, 2012).
Арнольд И.В. Современные лингвистические теории взаимодействия системы и среды//Вопросы языкознания, № 3, 1991 (Arnold I.V. Modern linguistic theories of the interaction of the system and the environment//Questions of linguistics, No. 3, 1991).
Баскаков Н.А. Историко-типологическая морфология тюркских языков (Структура слова и механизм агглютинации).–М.: Наука, 1975 (Baskakov N.A. Historical and typological morphology of Turkic languages (Word structure and agglutination mechanism) .– M.: Nauka, 1975).
Большой энциклопедический словарь. Языкознание.–М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1998 (A large encyclopedic dictionary. Linguistics.–M.: Bolshaya Rossiyskaya ensiklopediya, 1998).
Дадуева Е.А. Общая характеристика каузативных глаголов//Вестник СибГУТИ, № 2, 2011 (Dadueva E.A. General characteristics of causative verbs//Bulletin of SibSUTI, No. 2, 2011).
Длугош А.М. Английский аналитический каузатив со служебным глаголом GET//Автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук:–Киев, 1980; Цуй В., Бочина Т.Г. Каузативная конструкция в русском и китайском языках//Филологические науки, № 3, 2014 (Dlugosh A.M. English analytical causative with the official verb GET//Author. dis. Cand. filol. Sciences:–Kiev, 1980; Tsui V., Bochina T.G. The causative construction in Russian and Chinese//Philological Sciences, No. 3, 2014).
Гордон Е.Я. Семантические особенности каузативных глаголов чувства в русском языке//Русский язык. Теория и методика преподавания.–Душанбе, 1980 (Gordon E.Y. Semantic features of causative verbs of feeling in Russian//Russian language. Theory and teaching methodology.–Dushanbe, 1980).
Irisqulov M.T. Tilshunoslikka kirish.–Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 1992 (Iriskulov M.T. Introduction to linguistics.–Tashkent: O‘qituvchi, 1992).
Мельчук И.А. Курсы общей морфологии. Том II. Часть вторая: морфологические значения.–М.: Язык русской культуры, 1998 (Melchuk I.A. General morphology courses. Volume II Part two: morphological meanings.–M.: Yazik russkoy kulturi, 1998).
Мосина Н.М. Семантико-синтаксическая характеристика элементов каузативной конструкции в эрзянском языке//Вестник ЧГПУ, № 2, 2012 (Mosina N.M. The semantic-syntactic characteristic of the elements of the causative structure in the Erzya language//Bulletin of CHSPU, No. 2, 2012).
Мосина Н. М., Чинаева Н. В. Характеристика структурных компонентов каузативных конструкций различного типа в эрзянском языке//Финно-угорский мир, №4, 2014 (Mosina N. M., Chinaeva N. V. Characterization of the structural components of causative structures of various types in the Erzya language//Finno-Ugric World, No. 4, 2014).
Розенталь Д.Э., Теленкова М.А. Словарь-справочник лингвистических терминов.–M: Просвешение,1985 (Rosenthal D.E., Telenkova M.A. Dictionary of linguistic terms.–M: Prosvesheniye, 1985).
Sadullayeva L.I. Typologcal category of causative voice forms in Uzbek and English languages (Типологическая категория форм каузатива в узбекском и английском языках)//Сопоставительная лингвистика, № 6, 2017 (Sadullayeva L.I. Typologcal category of causative voice forms in Uzbek and English languages (Typological category of causative forms in Uzbek and English)//Comparative Linguistics, No. 6, 2017).
Sapayev Q. Hozirgi o‘zbek tili (morfemika, so‘z yasalishi va morfologiya). –Toshkent: TDPU, 2009 (Sapaev K. Modern Uzbek language (morphemic, word formation and morphology). –Tashkent: TSPU, 2009).
Теньер Л. Основы структурного синтаксиса.–М.: Прогресс, 1988 (Tenier L. Fundamentals of structural syntax.–M .: Progress, 1988).
Тестелец Я.Г. Введение в общий синтаксис.–М.: РГГУ, 2001 (Testelets Y.G. Introduction to the general syntax.–M .: RSGU, 2001).
Turniyozov N.Q. Tilshunoslikka kirish.–Samarqand: SamDCHTI, 2005 (Turniyazov N.K. Introduction to linguistics.–Samarkand: SamSIFL, 2005).
Шляхтер М.Е. Способы выражения каузации в ранних бенгальских текстах.–Санкт-Петербург: ИЛИ РАН, 2016; Данилова Н.И., Ефремов Н.Н., Самсонова Е.М. Функционально-семантические категории в якутском языке. Каузативность, эвиденциальность, интеративность.–Новосибирск: Наука, 2013 (Schlachter M.E. Ways of expressing causation in the early Bengali texts.–Saint Petersburg: ILR RAS, 2016; Danilova N.I., Efremov N.N., Samsonova E.M. Functional-semantic categories in the Yakut language. Causation, evidentiality, interactivity.–Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2013).
Шорохова И.А. Семантика каузативных глаголов в русском и польском языках. Дис. канд. филол. наук.–Челябинск, 2007 (Shorokhova I.A. Semantics of causative verbs in Russian and Polish. Dis. Cand. filol. sciences.–Chelyabinsk, 2007).
