SAMYUEL F. HANTINGTON SIVILIZATSIYALAR TO’QNASHUVI PARADIGMASI IJTIMOIY-FALSAFIY TAHLILI
##article.subject##:
Samuyel F. Xantington, Svilizatsiyalar to‘qnashuvi, ijtimoiy falsafa, sovuq urush, uchinchi dunyo davlatlari, svilizatsiya, madaniyat, din, sekulyarizm, paradigma, globalizm, modernizm, globallashuv, g‘oya va mafkura, lingua franka, sivilizatsiyaviy ong, ijtimoiy ong, psevda sivilizatsiya, paradigma##article.abstract##
Sovuq urushdan keyingi davr siyosati ssenariysiga e’tibor qaratgan S.Xantington qanday qilib siyosiy va iqtisodiy mafkura o‘z o‘rnini diniy va madaniy mafkuraga bo‘shatib berishini asoslashga urindi. S. Xantington falsafiy qarashlariga ko‘ra: ” Biz kim ekanligimizni kim emasligimiz va kimga qarshi ekanligimizni anglaganimizda anglab yetamiz. ” Bugungi kunda mamlakatlar mafkuraviy jihatdan bo‘linib ketishi mumkin. Ammo madaniy jihatdan birlashishini Berlin devori qulashi va ikki Germaniya birlashishi misolida izohlash mumkin. Xantingtonning qarashlariga ko‘ra, sovuq urushdan keyingi davrda kuchlar yettida sivilizatsiyalar (ehtimoliy Afrika bilan sakkizta) [1.40] o‘rtasida taqsimlanadi; arab, islom, xitoy, yapon, hind, lotin amerika, ortodoksal – rus sivilizatsiyalaridir. Ushbu tipologiyaga ko‘ra, yirik dinlar tarixan sivilizatsiyalar asosini tashkil qiladi. Sivilizatsiyalararo chegaralar aniq bo‘lmasada, o‘zaro dinamik munosabatlarda bardoshli va yashovchan bo‘ladi. Ushbu sivilizatsiyalararo munosabatlar keyingi o‘n yillik va undan keyingi davr dunyo hokimiyatini taqsimlash va boshqarish vazifasini bajaradi.
Библиографические ссылки
Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, 1996.
Michael Kennedy. Critical Review: The Clash of Civilizations.Samuel P. Huntinton. INTL Introduction to International Relations: Webster University, 2012
Samuel P. Huntington. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.University of Oklahoma Press: Norman and London, 1991.
Juan J. Linz & Alfred Stepan.Problems of Democratic transition and Consolidation.The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London,1996.
Gregorio Betizza & Fabio Petito.Why (Clash of) Cvilizations Discourses Just Won‘t Go Away? Understanding the Civilizational Politics of Our Times,2018.
Vincenco Bove & Gunes Gokmen.Cultural Distance and Interstate Conflicts.British Journal of Political Science, 2016.
Guido Thiemeyer.The “Forces Profondes” of Internationalism in the Late Nineteenth Century: Politics, Economy and Culture. The Nation State and Beyond,2013.
Edward Said. What They want is my silence. International Socialistic Review.2001.
Arshin Adib-Moghaddam.A Metahistory of the Clash of Cilizations: Us and Them Beyond Orientalism.Hurst&Company: London.2011.
Henry Kissinger.America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests. The Tribune: Voice of the People. 2023.
Richard Maher. Bipolarity and Future of U.S – China Relations. U. S – China Bipolarity.Political Science Quarterly. 2018.
Davide Orsi. The ‘Clash of Civilizations’ 25 Years On // A Multidisciplinary Appraisal. E- International Relations Publishing: Bristol, England. 2018.
Jan Ludert. An Alternative For Germany. Tracing Huntington‘s ‘Clash of Civilizations’ Thesis in A Right Wing Populist Party. E-International Relations. 2018.
Islombek Rakhmonberdiev. Clash or Cooperation of Civilizations? Current Assessments by Western Experts of the Concept of S. Huntington. CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY VOLUME: 04 ISSUE: 08 | AUG 2023 (ISSN: 2660-6836)
Islombek Rakhmonberdiev. ISLAM AND ITS INFLUENCE ON WORLD POLITICS AS ASSESSED BY SAMUEL P. “HUNTINGTON”. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences (E)ISSN:2181-1784 www.oriens.uz SJIF 2023 = 6.131 / ASI Factor = 1.7 3(9), September, 2023
