REPRESENTATIVENESS OF THE DIALECTS OF SURKHAN-DARYA REGION IN THE UZBEK NATIONAL DIALECT CORPUS
Keywords:
Surkhandarya region, representativeness of dialect corpus, communication model, lexical, morphological base, dialect grammatical unit rich in literary language and dialect unitsAbstract
This article presents the question of the representativeness of dialect units in the corpus of Uzbek national dialects on the example of Surkhandarya dialects, discusses the rules of constant general representativeness, the differences between these rules for general and special corpora, the possibility of developing specific conditions for maximum accuracy of language micromodels that have their own balance between genres and registers in the National Corpus. In addition to the corpus approach to documenting dialect information, views were also presented that the dialect corpus can be a new type of scientific resource that facilitates the presentation and study of not only the language, but also the model of language communication.
References
Abdulhakimovna K. M. Transcription in the corpus of the uzbek national boysun dialect (on the example of Baysun district" j" dialects) //Journal of Critical Reviews. – 2020. – Т. 7. – №. 5. – С. 844-847.
Abdulhakimovna X. M. Surxondaryo shevalari korpusiga sheva matnlarini ichki tizimga kiritish prinsiplari: //Образование и инновационные исследования международный научно-методический журнал. – 2023. – №. 1. – С. 39-45.
Abdulhakimovna K. M. Software and data entry principles of the online dialect database // Current research journal of philological sciences. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 11. – С. 46-53.
Biber Douglas Representativeness in corpus design. In: Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8, – P .243-257 (1993)
Sinclair J. Preliminary recommendations on Corpus Typology. Vers.: of 05., Y. 1996/
Leech. G.: The Importance of Reference Corpora, Lancaster University. In: http://www.uzei.com/modulos/usuariosFtp/conexion/archivos59A.pdf
Leech, G.: New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In: Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Rodopi, Amsterdam, – P. 133-149. (2007) https://www.clarin.eu/resource-families/reference-corpora
Marina Beridze, Liana Lortkipanidze, David Nadaraia. Dialect Dictionaries in the Georgian Dialect Corpus/ Arn. Chikobava Institute of Linguistics, Georgia/ http://mygeorgia.ge/gdc
Менглиев Б. и др. Морфологический анализ и синтез словоформ в лингвистическом анализаторе // Журнал языка и лингвистических исследований. – 2021. – Т. 17. – №. 1. – С. [558]-564.
N.Abdurahmonova Kompyuter lingvistikasi. Nodirabegim nashriyoti. –T.: 2021. –B. 91. – B.lar. 394.
Sinclair J. Preliminary recommendations on Corpus Typology. Vers.: of 05., Y. 1996/
Sh.Sh. Shoabdurahmonov tahriri ostida. O‘zbek xalq shevalari lug‘ati. Fan. 1971. – B. 409. – B. 110.
Холова М. Поисковые жанры текстовых сообщений и паспортные метрики в корпусе диалектов (Байсунский район на примере диалектов со звуком "J”) // Журнал перспективных исследований в области динамических систем и систем управления. – 2020. – Т. 12. – №. 6. – С. 1103-1107.
Холова М. А. Boysun shevasi onlayn ma’lumotlar bazasi (qidirish va saralash imkoniyatlari asosida) // Международный журнал искусство слова. – 2021. – Т. 4. – №. 1-1.
Холова М. А. O’zbek shevalarining standart tilga munosabati va til tizimidagi o’rni (Boysun tumani “j” lovchi shevalar misolida) //Международный журнал искусство слова. – 2020. – Т. 3. – №. 5.
Xolova M. Dialektal korpusning fonetik metarazmetkasi haqida ayrim qaydlar //Prospects of Uzbek applied philology. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 1.
Холова М. А. Boysun shevasi onlayn ma’lumotlar bazasi (qidirish va saralash imkoniyatlari asosida) // Mеждународный журнал искусство слова. – 2021. – Т. 4. – №. 1-1.
O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. II tom. O‘zbekiston. – Toshkent. 2020. – B. 671. – B. 127.
Sh.Boltayev. Malla savdogar. –T.:2019. 258-b.
https://sanstv.ru/dict/референт#
0аккуратно%20выполнял%20задания%20Батманова
