ASPECTUAL AND LEXICO-SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF VERBS

Authors

  • Davlatova Mukhayyo

Keywords:

Semantics, type of action, resulting deduction, perfect, classification, lexical, category, verb, predicate, aspectual semantics

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of and emotional and causal units of the English and Uzbek languages. It justifies that the semantic meaning is based on the causative feature of the verb plays. Despite the fact that extensive research has been carried out to determine the semantics of a verb, it remains relevant to study its essence and integrate it into a specific template and implement the classification. In the classification of verb semantics, the category of action is important because it is a universal phenomenon that is common to all languages. Although the interpretation of the nature of the movement is different from the nature of the language under study, but the common purpose is to form a classification of the verb semantics in each language. The movement style, the grammatical aspect category, and the concepts of the phase are combined into the category of aspect. According to the theories made by linguists, each category reflects the lexical and grammatical features of the verb, and in turn depends on the nature of each language. In particular, it deals with the study of linguistic factors that are related to the semantics of behavioral verbs, such as meanings, duration, procedurality, iterativeness, perfectionism, reflexivity, and so on. It is also controversial that the linguistic units that form the recursive meanings are expressed in different constructions according to their own design. Therefore, this article analyzes resulting deduction in English language as one of the key categories in the behavioral category. The factors contributing to relapse were studied and internal classification criteria were implemented.

References

Бондарко А. В. Принципы функциональной грамматики и вопросы аспектологии. – Л., 1983. –208 с. 7, 44.

Насилов Д.М. Проблемы тюркской аспектологии: Акциональность. Л., 1989. 208 с., 6.

Канеко Ю., Петрухина Е.В. Аспектуальная семантика в глагольных системах русского и японского языков (сопоставительный анализ фрагментов языковой картины мира) // Вопросы языкознания. 2004 № 4. С. 19-34.

Кодухов В.И. Обектные отношения и сложноподченение в предложение. Л., 1968. 209 с. 4.Мирсанов Ғ. Қ. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида юриш-ҳаракат феълларининг акционал ва

аспектуал хусусиятлари. Филол.фан.н. автореф. –Тошкент, 2009. -21 б.

Michaela Porn. Psychophysical and Physical Causative Emotion Verbs in Finnish: The Temporal Structure of Causative Emotion Verb + Infinitive 1 -Constructions within Conceptual Semantics

// SKY Journal of Linguistics. № 21. 2008. –P 201–218.

Оглоблин А.К. Харьковский В.С. Петербургская типологическая школа // Международная конференция посвященная 50-летию петербургской типологической школы: Материалы и тезисы докладов. СП. Б. Нестор-История. 2011. –С 9-17.

Насилов Д.М. Проблемы тюркской аспектологии: Акциональность. Л., 1989. 208 с., 6.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31