PRAGMATIC AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ACTS IN DIALOGIC DISCOURSE
Keywords:
speech act, dialogic discourse, pragmalinguistics, illocutionary force, perlocutionary influence, communicative intention, types of speech acts, discourse analysisAbstract
In this article, the pragmalinguistic features of speech acts within the framework of dialogic discourse are analyzed. It examines the interaction of illocutionary and perlocutionary forces arising in dialogic speech based on the basic principles of speech act theory (the concepts of J. Austin and J. Searle). Also, using examples, the use of such functional types of speech acts as directive, representative, expressive, commissive, and declarative in dialogic discourse is shown. The study highlights the role of pragmatic context, communicative purpose, and social relations between participants in the formation of speech acts. The conclusions of the article have important theoretical and practical significance in the pragmalinguistic analysis of dialogic discourse.
References
A’zam, E. (1980). Piyoda. Tashkent: G‘afur G‘ulom Publishing.
A’zam, E. (1981). Anoyining jaydari olmasi. Tashkent: G‘afur G‘ulom Publishing.
A’zam, E . Jannat o‘zi qaydadir (dramatik qissa) https://ziyouz.uz/ozbek-nasri/
A’zam, E. Tanho qayiq yoxud devonaning orzusi. https://ziyouz.uz/ozbek-nasri/
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752
Dynel, M. (2011). Stranger than fiction? Brno Studies in English, 37(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-3
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Routledge.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). Academic Press.
Hakimov M. O‘zbek pragmalingvistikasi asoslari. – Toshkent.: Akademnashr, 2013. – B. 120.
Haugh, M. (2013). Im/politeness and social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.003
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717
Lakoff G. Pragmatics in natural logic. – Formal semantics of natural language. – Cambr., 1975, – P. 171.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Blackwell.
Rahimov U. Lisoniy presuppozitsiya / A.G‘ulom va o‘zbek tilshunosligi: Ilmiy ishlar to‘plami. – Toshkent, 2004.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625237
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
Van Dijk, T.A. Discourse as Structure and Process. 1997.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Arnold.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957660
Крылов С. А. К типологии дейксиса // Лингвистические исследования. — Ч. 1. — М., 1984.
