КЕСАРЕВО СЕЧЕНИЕ У ЖЕНЩИН С РУБЦОМ НА МАТКЕ. СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ МЕТОДЫ ВЕДЕНИЯ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)

Setubal A, Alves J, Osorio F et al. Treatment for uterine isthmocele , a pouch-like defect at the site of cesarean section scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.022

Poidevin L.O. The value of hysterography in the prediction of cesarean section wound defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 81:67–71.

Burger NF, Darazs B, Boes EG. An echographic evaluation during the early puerperium of the uterine wound after caesarean section. J Clin Ultrasound 1982; 10:271–4.

Chen HY, Chen SJ, Hsieh FJ. Observation of cesarean section scar by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16:443–7.

Long-term implications of cesarean delivery. Letter to the Editors / R. Greene, F. Gardeil , MJ Turner // Am J Obstet Gynecol. - 1997. - Vol . 176. - P. 254.

Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor- Tritsch IE. Saline infusion sonohyste - rography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the 'niche' in the scar. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:1105–15

Vervoort AJ, Vissers J, Hehenkamp WJ et al. The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms

Chen Y, Chang Y, Yao S. Transvaginal management of cesarean section diverticulum: a novel surgical treatment. Med sci Monit 2014 20:1395–9.

Grace L, Nezhat A. Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparos copically ? A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23 (5): 843. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.030

Yoles L. Increased maternal mortality in cesarean section as compared to vaginal delivery? Time for re -evalution / L. Yoles , S. Maschiach // Am J Obstet Gynecol. ‒1998.‒Vol.178.‒P.1.

Krasnopolskaya K.V., Popov A.A., Chechneva M.A. etc. Pregravid metroplasty for incompetent uterine scar after caesarean section: impact on natural fertility and IVF results. reproduction problems. 2015; 3:56–62.

Blood loss during caesarean section and the use of new blood-substituting fluids ̆/ Repina M.A., Mikhailova L.G., Vanovskaya I.V. [and others] // Bulletin of the Russian Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. - 1999. - No1. - S. 106-109.

Puchkova N.V. Incompetent scar on the uterus after caesarean section: diagnosis, management tactics, reproductive prognosis. Abstract . dis . ... cand. honey. Sciences. M., 2014.

Buyanova S.N., Puchkova N.V. Incompetent scar on the uterus after caesarean section: diagnosis, management tactics, reproductive prognosis. Ros. Bulletin of an obstetrician-gynecologist. 2011; 4:19.

Valiev Sh.N., Negmadjanov B.B., Kim V.O. Damage to the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall due to irrational choice of access for abdominal delivery. Tibbiyotda yangi kun 2020, No4 (34), pp.125-128.

Valiev Sh.N., Negmadjanov B.B., Cesarean section: the choice of access as one of the ways to reduce postoperative complications. Doctor Ahborotnomasi . – Samarkand, 2022.- No2.1 - pp. 57-60.

Savelyeva G.M. Obstetrics. M.: Medicine, 2000.

Nozhnitseva O.N., Bezhenar V.F. Combined method of correction of local inconsistency of the scar on the uterus after caesarean section. reproduction problems. 2018; 24(5):45–52.

Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Karabach V.V., Chuprynin V.D. A new method of surgical treatment of uterine scar failure after caesarean section using an intrauterine manipulator with a gutter. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;

Reproductive health. T. 1. Common infections: Per. from English / Ed. Keita L.G., Bergera G.S., Edel -mana D.A. - M.: Medicine, 1988. - 400 p.

Extraperitoneal caesarean section: Method. recommendations / L.S. Persianinov, E.A. Chernukha, L.M. Komisarova. - M., 1978. - 12 p