LIMITATIONS OF AWAKE CRANIOTOMY IN THE SURGERY OF BRAIN GLIOMAS. CASE REPORTS

Authors

  • Mamadaliev Dilshod Мuhammadvalievich
  • Yakubov Jakhongir Bakhodirovich
  • Kariev Gayrat Maratovich
  • Asadullaev Ulugbek Мaksudovich
  • Zokirov Kamoliddin Sodiqovich
  • Akramov Dilyor Fakhriddinovich

Keywords:

awake craniotomy, cortical mapping, glioma of cerebral hemispheres.

Abstract

Actuality. Awake craniotomy, a method that allows intraoperative cortical mapping and functional cognitive testing, has now become the method of choice for resection of brain gliomas, which are located in or nearby eloquent cerebral cortex. But the procedure requires a strict election of the patients in order to avoid various intraoperative complications.

Objective. Sharing our two cases from our experience of using awake craniotomy that where not successful due to some limitations.

Materials and methods: This work is based on the analysis of 2 cases from our practice of patients who underwent awake brain tumor surgery in our skull base department of the Republican Scientific Practical Center for Neurosurgery.

Results. We have analyzed the cases of our 2 patients, whom we have performed awake brain surgery but, due to some limitations were not successful.  We have ruled out what kind of limitations can hinder to the success of the surgery.

Conclusion. The use of intraoperative cortical mapping and awake brain surgery facilitates to control speech as well as motor, sensory functions of the cerebral cortex. Mapping contributes to the best outcome of abovementioned functions in postoperative period. At the same time, careful patients selection is a fundamental success factor. To avoid unwanted intraoperative situations, a clear assessment of the mental status of the patients at the preoperative stage is crucial.

References

Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2001, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD seer.cancer. gov/csr/1975_2001 (Accessed on April 06, 2011).

De Benedictis A., Duffau H. Brain hodotopy: From esoteric concept to practical surgical applications. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:1709–1723. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182124690. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Кобяков Г.Л., Лубнин А.Ю., Куликов А.С., Гаврилов А.С., Горяйнов С.А., Поддубский А.А., Лодыгина К.С. «Краниотомия в сознании». Журн., Вопр.Нейрохирургии 2016г.

Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H: Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 130:898–914, 2007

Rostomily RC, Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E: Postop-erative deficits and functional recovery following removal of tumors involving the dominant hemisphere supplementary motor area. J Neurosurg 75:62–68, 1991

Haglund MM, Berger MS, Shamseldin M, Lettich E, Ojemann GA: Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas. Neurosurgery 34:567–576, 1994

Taylor MD, Bernstein M: Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases. J Neurosurg 90:35–41, 1999.

Matz PG, Cobbs C, Berger MS: Intraoperative cortical mapping as a guide to the surgical resection of gliomas. J Neu-rooncol 42:233–245, 1999.

Ritaccio, Anthony L et al. “Electrical Stimulation Mapping of the Brain: Basic Principles and Emerging Alternatives.” Journal of clinical neurophysiology: official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society vol. 35,2 (2018): 86-

doi:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000440

Selimbeyoglu A, Parvizi J. Electrical stimulation of the human brain: perceptual and behavioral phenomena reported in the old and new literature. Front Hum Neurosci 2010;4:46.

Lesser RP, Luders H, Klem G, Dinner DS, Morris HH, Hahn J. Cortical afterdischarge and functional response thresholds: results of extraoperative testing. Epilepsia 1984;25:615–621

Published

2022-12-06